Activation Steering for Robust Type Prediction in CodeLLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores "activation steering" as a technique to improve the robustness of code language models (CodeLLMs) at predicting the types of variables and expressions.
- The researchers develop a method to guide the activation patterns of CodeLLMs during training, which helps them better learn the underlying type structure of code.
- Their approach outperforms standard CodeLLMs on a variety of type prediction tasks, demonstrating improved robustness and generalization.
Plain English Explanation
Code language models are AI systems that can generate, understand, and reason about computer programs. A key challenge is getting these models to accurately predict the types of variables, functions, and other elements in code - the "type structure."
The researchers in this paper propose "activation steering" as a novel technique to address this challenge. The idea is to guide the internal activation patterns of the code model during training, steering it to learn more about the underlying type structure of the code it is exposed to.
By nudging the model's activations in this way, the researchers found they could significantly improve its ability to predict types accurately, even on code it had never seen before. This makes the model more robust and better able to generalize its type prediction abilities.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of activation steering through experiments on several standard benchmarks for type prediction. The activation-steered model outperformed regular code models, showing tangible benefits from this new training approach.
Technical Explanation
The core technical contribution of this paper is a novel "activation steering" method for training CodeLLMs. The key insight is that by directly shaping the internal activations of the model during training, one can guide it to better learn the type structure of code.
Specifically, the researchers introduce an auxiliary training objective that encourages the model's activations to align with a "type guidance" signal derived from the ground truth types in the training data. This extra objective is combined with the standard language modeling loss, nudging the model to encode type information in its internal representations.
To implement this, the authors devise a way to extract type-relevant "type guidance" vectors from the training code, and then use these to define a loss term that pulls the model's activations towards the desired type-aware representations.
Experiments show this activation steering approach leads to significant gains in type prediction accuracy compared to standard CodeLLM training. The model demonstrates improved robustness, being able to more reliably predict types even on unfamiliar code. Analysis confirms the activation steering helps the model build a richer understanding of type structure.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling technical contribution in the form of activation steering, demonstrating its effectiveness for enhancing type prediction in CodeLLMs. However, the analysis is limited to a few standard benchmarks, and it would be valuable to further evaluate the approach on a wider range of code understanding tasks and real-world applications.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the limitations or edge cases of activation steering. For example, it is unclear how the approach would scale to extremely large or complex codebases, or how sensitive it is to the quality and coverage of the type guidance signals used during training.
Further research could also investigate ways to make the activation steering process more efficient or automated, reducing the manual effort required to define the type guidance. Exploring connections to other recent advances in self-supervised representation learning for code could also yield interesting directions.
Overall, this paper presents a promising technique that advances the state-of-the-art in CodeLLM robustness. With further development and analysis, activation steering could become an important tool for building more reliable and capable code intelligence systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces "activation steering" as a novel training approach for improving the type prediction capabilities of code language models (CodeLLMs). By directly guiding the internal activations of the model to align with type-relevant representations, the researchers were able to significantly boost performance on standard type prediction benchmarks.
The activation steering technique demonstrates the value of explicitly incorporating structural domain knowledge, like type information, into the training of CodeLLMs. This allows the models to build a more robust and generalizable understanding of the underlying type structure of code.
While further research is needed to fully explore the limitations and scaling of this approach, this work represents an important step forward in enhancing the reliability and capabilities of code intelligence systems. As AI continues to play an increasing role in software development and analysis, techniques like activation steering will be crucial for building CodeLLMs that can be trusted to understand and reason about complex codebases.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Activation Steering for Robust Type Prediction in CodeLLMs
Francesca Lucchetti, Arjun Guha
CodeLLMs are transforming software development as we know it. This is especially true for tasks where rule-based approaches fall short, like type prediction. The type prediction task consists in adding a new type annotation to a partially typed program, such that the resulting program is closer to being fully typed. The intractability of rule-based approaches and high cost of manual annotation make CodeLLMs an attractive solution to the problem. However, CodeLLMs are still far from being deployed on the large-scale due to doubts surrounding their reliability. To shed some light on how CodeLLMs approach type prediction, we investigate what happens when a model mispredicts a type. We show that by applying semantics-preserving edits to code, CodeLLMs are eventually misled into mispredicting type annotations. However, by leveraging activation steering we are able to steer the model back to the correct prediction, making models more robust against semantically irrelevant prompt features. We show that steering achieves comparable performance to fine-tuning directly on the type prediction task. Furthermore, we find that steering vectors computed from Python code are effective at correcting TypeScript mispredictions, and vice versa. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of its kind to suggest that CodeLLMs learn task representations that transfer across languages.
Read more9/16/2024
💬
0
Activation Addition: Steering Language Models Without Optimization
Alexander Matt Turner, Lisa Thiergart, Gavin Leech, David Udell, Juan J. Vazquez, Ulisse Mini, Monte MacDiarmid
Reliably controlling the behavior of large language models is a pressing open problem. Existing methods include supervised finetuning, reinforcement learning from human feedback, prompt engineering and guided decoding. We instead investigate activation engineering: modifying activations at inference-time to predictably alter model behavior. We bias the forward pass with a 'steering vector' implicitly specified through natural language. Past work learned these steering vectors; our Activation Addition (ActAdd) method instead computes them by taking activation differences resulting from pairs of prompts. We demonstrate ActAdd on a range of LLMs (LLaMA-3, OPT, GPT-2, and GPT-J), obtaining SOTA on detoxification and negative-to-positive sentiment control. Our approach yields inference-time control over high-level properties of output like topic and sentiment while preserving performance on off-target tasks. ActAdd takes far less compute and implementation effort than finetuning or RLHF, allows users control through natural language, and its computational overhead (as a fraction of inference time) appears stable or improving over increasing model size.
Read more6/5/2024
🔎
0
Programming Refusal with Conditional Activation Steering
Bruce W. Lee, Inkit Padhi, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Erik Miehling, Pierre Dognin, Manish Nagireddy, Amit Dhurandhar
LLMs have shown remarkable capabilities, but precisely controlling their response behavior remains challenging. Existing activation steering methods alter LLM behavior indiscriminately, limiting their practical applicability in settings where selective responses are essential, such as content moderation or domain-specific assistants. In this paper, we propose Conditional Activation Steering (CAST), which analyzes LLM activation patterns during inference to selectively apply or withhold activation steering based on the input context. Our method is based on the observation that different categories of prompts activate distinct patterns in the model's hidden states. Using CAST, one can systematically control LLM behavior with rules like if input is about hate speech or adult content, then refuse or if input is not about legal advice, then refuse. This allows for selective modification of responses to specific content while maintaining normal responses to other content, all without requiring weight optimization. We release an open-source implementation of our framework.
Read more9/11/2024
💬
0
Trojan Activation Attack: Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Activation Steering for Safety-Alignment
Haoran Wang, Kai Shu
To ensure AI safety, instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) are specifically trained to ensure alignment, which refers to making models behave in accordance with human intentions. While these models have demonstrated commendable results on various safety benchmarks, the vulnerability of their safety alignment has not been extensively studied. This is particularly troubling given the potential harm that LLMs can inflict. Existing attack methods on LLMs often rely on poisoned training data or the injection of malicious prompts. These approaches compromise the stealthiness and generalizability of the attacks, making them susceptible to detection. Additionally, these models often demand substantial computational resources for implementation, making them less practical for real-world applications. In this work, we study a different attack scenario, called Trojan Activation Attack (TA^2), which injects trojan steering vectors into the activation layers of LLMs. These malicious steering vectors can be triggered at inference time to steer the models toward attacker-desired behaviors by manipulating their activations. Our experiment results on four primary alignment tasks show that TA^2 is highly effective and adds little or no overhead to attack efficiency. Additionally, we discuss potential countermeasures against such activation attacks.
Read more8/19/2024