Trojan Activation Attack: Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Activation Steering for Safety-Alignment

Read original: arXiv:2311.09433 - Published 8/19/2024 by Haoran Wang, Kai Shu
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers studied a new attack called Trojan Activation Attack (TA^2) that can manipulate large language models (LLMs) to behave in unintended ways.
  • Existing attack methods often rely on poisoned training data or malicious prompts, which can be detected.
  • TA^2 injects trojan steering vectors into the activation layers of LLMs, allowing attackers to trigger undesirable behaviors during inference.
  • Experiments show TA^2 is highly effective and efficient, raising concerns about the vulnerability of safety-aligned LLMs.
  • Potential countermeasures against such activation attacks are discussed.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems trained to understand and generate human-like text. To make these models safe and aligned with human intentions, researchers train them using special techniques. However, a new study suggests that these safety-aligned LLMs may still be vulnerable to a novel attack called Trojan Activation Attack (TA^2).

Unlike previous attack methods that rely on poisoning the model's training data or injecting malicious prompts, TA^2 works by secretly embedding "trojan steering vectors" into the model's activation layers. These vectors can be triggered during normal use, causing the model to behave in unintended and potentially harmful ways.

The researchers found that TA^2 is highly effective and efficient, often without adding significant overhead to the attack. This is particularly concerning because it means the vulnerabilities may be difficult to detect and prevent.

The study highlights the need to continue researching ways to make LLMs more robust and secure, even as they are trained to be aligned with human values and intentions. Potential countermeasures, such as new detection methods or architectural changes, are discussed as areas for further exploration.

Technical Explanation

The researchers investigated a novel attack scenario called Trojan Activation Attack (TA^2) that targets the activation layers of instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs). Unlike previous attacks that rely on poisoned training data or malicious prompts, TA^2 injects malicious "trojan steering vectors" into the activation layers of the LLM.

These trojan vectors can be triggered during normal inference, causing the model to exhibit unintended and potentially harmful behaviors. The researchers conducted experiments on four primary alignment tasks and found that TA^2 is highly effective, often with little to no overhead in attack efficiency.

This is particularly concerning because existing attack methods that rely on data poisoning or prompt injection can be more easily detected and mitigated. The stealthiness and generalizability of TA^2 make it a significant threat to the safety and security of LLMs, even those that have been trained to be aligned with human intentions.

The researchers also discuss potential countermeasures against such activation-based attacks, such as architectural changes or robust training techniques, as areas for further research and development.

Critical Analysis

The study highlights a concerning vulnerability in safety-aligned LLMs, demonstrating that even models trained to behave in accordance with human intentions can be manipulated through stealthy attacks on their activation layers. This is particularly troubling given the potential for LLMs to cause harm if their behavior is subverted.

While the researchers discuss potential countermeasures, the fact that TA^2 can be implemented with little overhead and be difficult to detect raises questions about the robustness of current safety-alignment techniques. Further research is needed to understand the distinct mechanisms underlying these attacks and develop more comprehensive defenses.

Additionally, the study focuses on the technical aspects of the attack, but it would be valuable to explore the broader implications and potential real-world consequences of such vulnerabilities in safety-critical applications of LLMs. Careful consideration of the ethical and societal impact is essential as these models become more widely deployed.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on a novel attack called Trojan Activation Attack (TA^2) that can manipulate the behavior of safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) in unintended and potentially harmful ways. Unlike previous attack methods, TA^2 injects malicious "trojan steering vectors" into the activation layers of the models, allowing attackers to trigger undesirable behaviors during normal use.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of TA^2, raising concerns about the vulnerability of current safety-alignment techniques. This highlights the need for continued research and development of robust defenses to ensure the security and reliability of LLMs, especially as they are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Trojan Activation Attack: Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Activation Steering for Safety-Alignment

Haoran Wang, Kai Shu

To ensure AI safety, instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) are specifically trained to ensure alignment, which refers to making models behave in accordance with human intentions. While these models have demonstrated commendable results on various safety benchmarks, the vulnerability of their safety alignment has not been extensively studied. This is particularly troubling given the potential harm that LLMs can inflict. Existing attack methods on LLMs often rely on poisoned training data or the injection of malicious prompts. These approaches compromise the stealthiness and generalizability of the attacks, making them susceptible to detection. Additionally, these models often demand substantial computational resources for implementation, making them less practical for real-world applications. In this work, we study a different attack scenario, called Trojan Activation Attack (TA^2), which injects trojan steering vectors into the activation layers of LLMs. These malicious steering vectors can be triggered at inference time to steer the models toward attacker-desired behaviors by manipulating their activations. Our experiment results on four primary alignment tasks show that TA^2 is highly effective and adds little or no overhead to attack efficiency. Additionally, we discuss potential countermeasures against such activation attacks.

Read more

8/19/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Nothing in Excess: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering

Zouying Cao, Yifei Yang, Hai Zhao

Safety alignment is indispensable for Large language models (LLMs) to defend threats from malicious instructions. However, recent researches reveal safety-aligned LLMs prone to reject benign queries due to the exaggerated safety issue, limiting their helpfulness. In this paper, we propose a Safety-Conscious Activation Steering (SCANS) method to mitigate the exaggerated safety concerns in aligned LLMs. First, SCANS extracts the refusal steering vectors within the activation space and utilizes vocabulary projection to anchor some specific safety-critical layers which influence model refusal behavior. Second, by tracking the hidden state transition, SCANS identifies the steering direction and steers the model behavior accordingly, achieving a balance between exaggerated safety and adequate safety. Experiments show that SCANS achieves new state-of-the-art performance on XSTest and OKTest benchmarks, without impairing their defense capability against harmful queries and maintaining almost unchanged model capability.

Read more

8/22/2024

Stealthy and Persistent Unalignment on Large Language Models via Backdoor Injections
Total Score

0

Stealthy and Persistent Unalignment on Large Language Models via Backdoor Injections

Yuanpu Cao, Bochuan Cao, Jinghui Chen

Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have manifested significant advancements. To facilitate safeguards against malicious exploitation, a body of research has concentrated on aligning LLMs with human preferences and inhibiting their generation of inappropriate content. Unfortunately, such alignments are often vulnerable: fine-tuning with a minimal amount of harmful data can easily unalign the target LLM. While being effective, such fine-tuning-based unalignment approaches also have their own limitations: (1) non-stealthiness, after fine-tuning, safety audits or red-teaming can easily expose the potential weaknesses of the unaligned models, thereby precluding their release/use. (2) non-persistence, the unaligned LLMs can be easily repaired through re-alignment, i.e., fine-tuning again with aligned data points. In this work, we show that it is possible to conduct stealthy and persistent unalignment on large language models via backdoor injections. We also provide a novel understanding on the relationship between the backdoor persistence and the activation pattern and further provide guidelines for potential trigger design. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed stealthy and persistent unalignment can successfully pass the safety evaluation while maintaining strong persistence against re-alignment defense.

Read more

6/11/2024

Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations
Total Score

0

Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations

Sahar Abdelnabi, Aideen Fay, Giovanni Cherubin, Ahmed Salem, Mario Fritz, Andrew Paverd

Large Language Models (LLMs) are routinely used in retrieval-augmented applications to orchestrate tasks and process inputs from users and other sources. These inputs, even in a single LLM interaction, can come from a variety of sources, of varying trustworthiness and provenance. This opens the door to prompt injection attacks, where the LLM receives and acts upon instructions from supposedly data-only sources, thus deviating from the user's original instructions. We define this as task drift, and we propose to catch it by scanning and analyzing the LLM's activations. We compare the LLM's activations before and after processing the external input in order to detect whether this input caused instruction drift. We develop two probing methods and find that simply using a linear classifier can detect drift with near perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set. We show that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions, without being trained on any of these attacks. Our setup does not require any modification of the LLM (e.g., fine-tuning) or any text generation, thus maximizing deployability and cost efficiency and avoiding reliance on unreliable model output. To foster future research on activation-based task inspection, decoding, and interpretability, we will release our large-scale TaskTracker toolkit, comprising a dataset of over 500K instances, representations from 5 SoTA language models, and inspection tools.

Read more

7/22/2024