Understanding Online Discussion Across Difference: Insights from Gun Discourse on Reddit
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines online discussions on Reddit related to gun politics
- Aims to understand how people with different views engage in discourse across differences
- Uses natural language processing and network analysis to analyze patterns in the discussion
Plain English Explanation
This paper explores how people with different views on gun politics interact and discuss the topic on the social media platform Reddit. The researchers used a combination of natural language processing techniques and network analysis to examine the patterns and dynamics of these online conversations.
The key idea is to understand how people engaged in these discussions, even when they had differing opinions or perspectives on the issue. By analyzing the language used, the interactions between users, and the overall structure of the discussion threads, the researchers gained insights into how online discourse can play out across ideological divides.
The findings from this study could help inform strategies for facilitating more constructive and meaningful dialogue on polarizing topics, both online and offline. It highlights the challenges, but also the potential, for people to engage productively with those who hold different views from their own.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected data on gun-related discussions from popular subreddits on Reddit, focusing on threads where users expressed a range of opinions on the topic. They used natural language processing techniques to analyze the language and sentiment expressed in the comments, as well as network analysis to examine the patterns of interactions between users.
Some of the key findings include:
- Users with opposing views on guns often engaged in heated, adversarial exchanges, with little evidence of productive dialogue or mutual understanding
- However, there were also instances where users with different views were able to have more nuanced, balanced discussions, suggesting the potential for constructive cross-difference engagement
- The structure and dynamics of discussion threads played a role in shaping the nature of the discourse, with certain thread characteristics associated with more civil and collaborative exchanges
The researchers argue that understanding these dynamics is important for developing strategies to foster more productive online discussions, particularly on contentious topics where people hold strongly divergent views.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for online discourse across ideological divides. However, the research is limited to a specific context (gun politics on Reddit) and may not be generalizable to other topics or platforms.
Additionally, the study does not delve deeply into the underlying psychological, social, or cultural factors that might influence how people engage in these discussions. Further research could explore these broader societal dynamics in more detail.
It's also worth noting that the researchers acknowledge the difficulty of drawing definitive conclusions from observational data, and call for more experimental studies to test potential interventions for improving cross-difference dialogue.
Conclusion
This study offers a nuanced look at how people with different views on gun politics interact and discuss the issue online. While the findings highlight the challenges of navigating ideological divides, they also point to the potential for more constructive engagement, given the right conditions and strategies.
The insights from this research could inform efforts to foster more productive dialogue on a range of polarizing topics, both online and in the real world. By understanding the dynamics of cross-difference discourse, we can work towards creating spaces where people with diverse perspectives can engage meaningfully and work towards mutual understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding Online Discussion Across Difference: Insights from Gun Discourse on Reddit
Rijul Magu, Nivedhitha Mathan Kumar, Yihe Liu, Xander Koo, Diyi Yang, Amy Bruckman
When discussing difficult topics online, is it common to meaningfully engage with people from diverse perspectives? Why or why not? Could features of the online environment be redesigned to encourage civil conversation across difference? In this paper, we study discussions of gun policy on Reddit, with the overarching goal of developing insights into the potential of the internet to support understanding across difference. We use two methods: a clustering analysis of Reddit posts to contribute insights about what people discuss, and an interview study of twenty Reddit users to help us understand why certain kinds of conversation take place and others don't. We find that the discussion of gun politics falls into three groups: conservative pro-gun, liberal pro-gun, and liberal anti-gun. Each type of group has its own characteristic topics. While our subjects state that they would be willing to engage with others across the ideological divide, in practice they rarely do. Subjects are siloed into like-minded subreddits through a two-pronged effect, where they are simultaneously pushed away from opposing-view communities while actively seeking belonging in like-minded ones. Another contributing factor is Reddit's karma mechanism: fear of being downvoted and losing karma points and social approval of peers causes our subjects to hesitate to say anything in conflict with group norms. The pseudonymous nature of discussion on Reddit plays a complex role, with some subjects finding it freeing and others fearing reprisal from others not bound by face-to-face norms of politeness. Our subjects believe that content moderation can help ameliorate these issues; however, our findings suggest that moderators need different tools to do so effectively. We conclude by suggesting platform design changes that might increase discussion across difference.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Analyzing Toxicity in Deep Conversations: A Reddit Case Study
Vigneshwaran Shankaran, Rajesh Sharma
Online social media has become increasingly popular in recent years due to its ease of access and ability to connect with others. One of social media's main draws is its anonymity, allowing users to share their thoughts and opinions without fear of judgment or retribution. This anonymity has also made social media prone to harmful content, which requires moderation to ensure responsible and productive use. Several methods using artificial intelligence have been employed to detect harmful content. However, conversation and contextual analysis of hate speech are still understudied. Most promising works only analyze a single text at a time rather than the conversation supporting it. In this work, we employ a tree-based approach to understand how users behave concerning toxicity in public conversation settings. To this end, we collect both the posts and the comment sections of the top 100 posts from 8 Reddit communities that allow profanity, totaling over 1 million responses. We find that toxic comments increase the likelihood of subsequent toxic comments being produced in online conversations. Our analysis also shows that immediate context plays a vital role in shaping a response rather than the original post. We also study the effect of consensual profanity and observe overlapping similarities with non-consensual profanity in terms of user behavior and patterns.
Read more4/12/2024
🛸
0
New!Characterizing the Structure of Online Conversations Across Reddit
Yulin Yu, Julie Jiang, Paramveer Dhillon
The proliferation of social media platforms has afforded social scientists unprecedented access to vast troves of data on human interactions, facilitating the study of online behavior at an unparalleled scale. These platforms typically structure conversations as threads, forming tree-like structures known as discussion trees. This paper examines the structural properties of online discussions on Reddit by analyzing both global (community-level) and local (post-level) attributes of these discussion trees. We conduct a comprehensive statistical analysis of a year's worth of Reddit data, encompassing a quarter of a million posts and several million comments. Our primary objective is to disentangle the relative impacts of global and local properties and evaluate how specific features shape discussion tree structures. The results reveal that both local and global features contribute significantly to explaining structural variation in discussion trees. However, local features, such as post content and sentiment, collectively have a greater impact, accounting for a larger proportion of variation in the width, depth, and size of discussion trees. Our analysis also uncovers considerable heterogeneity in the impact of various features on discussion structures. Notably, certain global features play crucial roles in determining specific discussion tree properties. These features include the subreddit's topic, age, popularity, and content redundancy. For instance, posts in subreddits focused on politics, sports, and current events tend to generate deeper and wider discussion trees. This research enhances our understanding of online conversation dynamics and offers valuable insights for both content creators and platform designers. By elucidating the factors that shape online discussions, our work contributes to ongoing efforts to improve the quality and effectiveness of digital discourse.
Read more9/19/2024
0
Structure and dynamics of growing networks of Reddit threads
Diletta Goglia, Davide Vega
Millions of people use online social networks to reinforce their sense of belonging, for example by giving and asking for feedback as a form of social validation and self-recognition. It is common to observe disagreement among people beliefs and points of view when expressing this feedback. Modeling and analyzing such interactions is crucial to understand social phenomena that happen when people face different opinions while expressing and discussing their values. In this work, we study a Reddit community in which people participate to judge or be judged with respect to some behavior, as it represents a valuable source to study how users express judgments online. We model threads of this community as complex networks of user interactions growing in time, and we analyze the evolution of their structural properties. We show that the evolution of Reddit networks differ from other real social networks, despite falling in the same category. This happens because their global clustering coefficient is extremely small and the average shortest path length increases over time. Such properties reveal how users discuss in threads, i.e. with mostly one other user and often by a single message. We strengthen such result by analyzing the role that disagreement and reciprocity play in such conversations. We also show that Reddit thread's evolution over time is governed by two subgraphs growing at different speeds. We discover that, in the studied community, the difference of such speed is higher than in other communities because of the user guidelines enforcing specific user interactions. Finally, we interpret the obtained results on user behavior drawing back to Social Judgment Theory.
Read more9/9/2024