Enhancing Trustworthiness in ML-Based Network Intrusion Detection with Uncertainty Quantification
2310.10655
0
0
🌐
Abstract
The evolution of Internet and its related communication technologies have consistently increased the risk of cyber-attacks. In this context, a crucial role is played by Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs), which are security devices designed to identify and mitigate attacks to modern networks. Data-driven approaches based on Machine Learning (ML) have gained more and more popularity for executing the classification tasks required by signature-based IDSs. However, typical ML models adopted for this purpose do not properly take into account the uncertainty associated with their prediction. This poses significant challenges, as they tend to produce misleadingly high classification scores for both misclassified inputs and inputs belonging to unknown classes (e.g. novel attacks), limiting the trustworthiness of existing ML-based solutions. In this paper, we argue that ML-based IDSs should always provide accurate uncertainty quantification to avoid overconfident predictions. In fact, an uncertainty-aware classification would be beneficial to enhance closed-set classification performance, would make it possible to carry out Active Learning, and would help recognize inputs of unknown classes as truly unknowns, unlocking open-set classification capabilities and Out-of-Distribution (OoD) detection. To verify it, we compare various ML-based methods for uncertainty quantification and for open-set classification, either specifically designed for or tailored to the domain of network intrusion detection. Moreover, we develop a custom model based on Bayesian Neural Networks to ensure reliable uncertainty estimates and improve the OoD detection capabilities, thus showing how proper uncertainty quantification can be exploited to significantly enhance the trustworthiness of ML-based IDSs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the importance of accurate uncertainty quantification in machine learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs) to improve their trustworthiness and performance.
- It compares various ML-based methods for uncertainty quantification and open-set classification, specifically designed for or tailored to the domain of network intrusion detection.
- The paper also presents a custom model based on Bayesian Neural Networks to ensure reliable uncertainty estimates and improve out-of-distribution (OoD) detection capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
As our world becomes more connected through the internet, the risk of cyber-attacks also grows. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) are security devices designed to identify and mitigate these attacks. Machine learning (ML) models have become a popular way to power the classification tasks required by IDSs.
However, typical ML models used for this purpose often do not properly account for the uncertainty in their predictions. This can lead to overconfident classifications, even for inputs that are misclassified or belong to unknown classes (e.g., new types of attacks). This lack of uncertainty awareness undermines the trustworthiness of these ML-based IDSs.
The researchers argue that ML-based IDSs should always provide accurate uncertainty quantification to avoid these issues. By understanding how confident or uncertain the model is in its predictions, the IDS can make more informed decisions and better recognize when it's dealing with something it's not familiar with.
Incorporating proper uncertainty quantification can:
- Enhance closed-set classification performance: The model can better distinguish between confident and uncertain predictions.
- Enable Active Learning: The model can identify the most informative samples to label, improving its performance over time.
- Unlock open-set classification and out-of-distribution (OoD) detection: The model can recognize when it's encountering something new or different from its training data.
Technical Explanation
The paper compares various ML-based methods for uncertainty quantification and open-set classification, specifically designed for or tailored to the domain of network intrusion detection.
One of the key approaches presented is a custom model based on Bayesian Neural Networks. Bayesian Neural Networks can provide reliable uncertainty estimates by modeling the inherent uncertainties in the model parameters. This helps the IDS better distinguish between confident and uncertain predictions, improving its overall performance and trustworthiness.
The researchers evaluate the different methods on standard intrusion detection datasets, assessing their ability to accurately quantify uncertainty and detect out-of-distribution (OoD) samples. The results show that the custom Bayesian Neural Network model outperforms other approaches in terms of OoD detection and provides more reliable uncertainty estimates.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of various uncertainty quantification and open-set classification methods for ML-based IDSs. However, it's essential to note that the performance of these models may be influenced by the quality and representativeness of the training data. If the dataset used to train the models does not capture the full spectrum of potential cyber-attacks, the models' ability to detect novel threats may be limited.
Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that their custom Bayesian Neural Network model may be more computationally expensive than some of the other approaches. This could be a concern for real-time IDS applications, where processing speed is critical.
Further research could explore ways to strike a balance between model complexity, uncertainty quantification, and computational efficiency, ensuring that ML-based IDSs can be deployed in practical, high-stakes scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the importance of accurate uncertainty quantification in ML-based intrusion detection systems. By incorporating reliable uncertainty estimates, IDSs can make more informed decisions, better recognize novel threats, and ultimately improve their trustworthiness and effectiveness in protecting modern networks from cyber-attacks.
The researchers have presented a promising custom model based on Bayesian Neural Networks that outperforms other approaches in terms of out-of-distribution detection and uncertainty quantification. This work represents a significant step forward in enhancing the robustness and reliability of ML-based security solutions, which will become increasingly crucial as the internet and related technologies continue to evolve.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
A Comprehensive Survey on Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning
Wenchong He, Zhe Jiang
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved tremendous success in making accurate predictions for computer vision, natural language processing, as well as science and engineering domains. However, it is also well-recognized that DNNs sometimes make unexpected, incorrect, but overconfident predictions. This can cause serious consequences in high-stake applications, such as autonomous driving, medical diagnosis, and disaster response. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) aims to estimate the confidence of DNN predictions beyond prediction accuracy. In recent years, many UQ methods have been developed for DNNs. It is of great practical value to systematically categorize these UQ methods and compare their advantages and disadvantages. However, existing surveys mostly focus on categorizing UQ methodologies from a neural network architecture perspective or a Bayesian perspective and ignore the source of uncertainty that each methodology can incorporate, making it difficult to select an appropriate UQ method in practice. To fill the gap, this paper presents a systematic taxonomy of UQ methods for DNNs based on the types of uncertainty sources (data uncertainty versus model uncertainty). We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of methods in each category. We show how our taxonomy of UQ methodologies can potentially help guide the choice of UQ method in different machine learning problems (e.g., active learning, robustness, and reinforcement learning). We also identify current research gaps and propose several future research directions.
4/11/2024
🤿
A Structured Review of Literature on Uncertainty in Machine Learning & Deep Learning
Fahimeh Fakour, Ali Mosleh, Ramin Ramezani
0
0
The adaptation and use of Machine Learning (ML) in our daily lives has led to concerns in lack of transparency, privacy, reliability, among others. As a result, we are seeing research in niche areas such as interpretability, causality, bias and fairness, and reliability. In this survey paper, we focus on a critical concern for adaptation of ML in risk-sensitive applications, namely understanding and quantifying uncertainty. Our paper approaches this topic in a structured way, providing a review of the literature in the various facets that uncertainty is enveloped in the ML process. We begin by defining uncertainty and its categories (e.g., aleatoric and epistemic), understanding sources of uncertainty (e.g., data and model), and how uncertainty can be assessed in terms of uncertainty quantification techniques (Ensembles, Bayesian Neural Networks, etc.). As part of our assessment and understanding of uncertainty in the ML realm, we cover metrics for uncertainty quantification for a single sample, dataset, and metrics for accuracy of the uncertainty estimation itself. This is followed by discussions on calibration (model and uncertainty), and decision making under uncertainty. Thus, we provide a more complete treatment of uncertainty: from the sources of uncertainty to the decision-making process. We have focused the review of uncertainty quantification methods on Deep Learning (DL), while providing the necessary background for uncertainty discussion within ML in general. Key contributions in this review are broadening the scope of uncertainty discussion, as well as an updated review of uncertainty quantification methods in DL.
6/4/2024
Improving Label Error Detection and Elimination with Uncertainty Quantification
Johannes Jakubik, Michael Vossing, Manil Maskey, Christopher Wolfle, Gerhard Satzger
0
0
Identifying and handling label errors can significantly enhance the accuracy of supervised machine learning models. Recent approaches for identifying label errors demonstrate that a low self-confidence of models with respect to a certain label represents a good indicator of an erroneous label. However, latest work has built on softmax probabilities to measure self-confidence. In this paper, we argue that -- as softmax probabilities do not reflect a model's predictive uncertainty accurately -- label error detection requires more sophisticated measures of model uncertainty. Therefore, we develop a range of novel, model-agnostic algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification-Based Label Error Detection (UQ-LED), which combine the techniques of confident learning (CL), Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), model uncertainty measures (e.g., entropy), and ensemble learning to enhance label error detection. We comprehensively evaluate our algorithms on four image classification benchmark datasets in two stages. In the first stage, we demonstrate that our UQ-LED algorithms outperform state-of-the-art confident learning in identifying label errors. In the second stage, we show that removing all identified errors from the training data based on our approach results in higher accuracies than training on all available labeled data. Importantly, besides our contributions to the detection of label errors, we particularly propose a novel approach to generate realistic, class-dependent label errors synthetically. Overall, our study demonstrates that selectively cleaning datasets with UQ-LED algorithms leads to more accurate classifications than using larger, noisier datasets.
5/17/2024
🤿
Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning
Peter Jan van Leeuwen, J. Christine Chiu, C. Kevin Yang
0
0
A complete and statistically consistent uncertainty quantification for deep learning is provided, including the sources of uncertainty arising from (1) the new input data, (2) the training and testing data (3) the weight vectors of the neural network, and (4) the neural network because it is not a perfect predictor. Using Bayes Theorem and conditional probability densities, we demonstrate how each uncertainty source can be systematically quantified. We also introduce a fast and practical way to incorporate and combine all sources of errors for the first time. For illustration, the new method is applied to quantify errors in cloud autoconversion rates, predicted from an artificial neural network that was trained by aircraft cloud probe measurements in the Azores and the stochastic collection equation formulated as a two-moment bin model. For this specific example, the output uncertainty arising from uncertainty in the training and testing data is dominant, followed by uncertainty in the input data, in the trained neural network, and uncertainty in the weights. We discuss the usefulness of the methodology for machine learning practice, and how, through inclusion of uncertainty in the training data, the new methodology is less sensitive to input data that falls outside of the training data set.
6/3/2024