Unraveling the Truth: Do LLMs really Understand Charts? A Deep Dive into Consistency and Robustness
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) truly understand the information conveyed in data visualizations, such as charts and graphs.
- The researchers conducted a series of experiments to assess the consistency and robustness of LLMs in interpreting and reasoning about chart content.
- The findings shed light on the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs when it comes to complex visual reasoning tasks.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers are trying to find out if large language models (LLMs) - the powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text - can truly understand the information presented in data visualizations like charts and graphs. To do this, they ran a series of experiments to test how consistent and reliable LLMs are when it comes to interpreting and reasoning about the content of these visual elements.
The key question they are exploring is: Do LLMs have a genuine understanding of the information conveyed in charts, or are they just relying on superficial patterns and heuristics to provide responses? By digging deeper into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in this domain, the researchers hope to shed light on the current state of visual reasoning in these advanced AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the ability of large language models (LLMs) to understand and reason about data visualizations, such as those found in Enhancing Question Answering with Charts through Effective Pre-training, ChartXlV: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding with Multimodal Transformers, and ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning on Charts.
The researchers designed a series of experiments to assess the consistency and robustness of LLMs in interpreting chart content. This involved evaluating the models' performance on tasks such as Are Large Vision-Language Models Up to the Task? and MChatQA: A Universal Benchmark for Multimodal Chart Question Answering. The findings provide insights into the current capabilities and limitations of LLMs when it comes to complex visual reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed investigation into the visual reasoning abilities of large language models. The researchers have carefully crafted a series of experiments to assess the consistency and robustness of LLMs in interpreting chart content, which is a crucial step in understanding the true capabilities of these systems.
However, the paper also acknowledges the inherent challenges and limitations of the current state of visual reasoning in LLMs. The researchers note that while LLMs may excel at certain tasks, they may still struggle with more complex, context-dependent reasoning about data visualizations. Additionally, the paper suggests that the performance of LLMs may be heavily influenced by the specific dataset and training approach used, highlighting the need for further research to fully understand the generalizability of these findings.
It is also important to consider the potential biases and blind spots that may be present in the LLMs being evaluated, as these could influence their interpretation of chart content in ways that may not be immediately apparent. The paper does not delve deeply into these issues, and further exploration of these factors could provide valuable insights.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the visual reasoning capabilities of large language models. By systematically evaluating the consistency and robustness of LLMs in interpreting chart content, the researchers have shed light on the current state of this technology and the challenges that still need to be addressed.
The findings presented in this paper have important implications for the development and deployment of LLMs in real-world applications that involve complex visual reasoning tasks. The insights gained from this research can inform the design of more effective training strategies and architectures, ultimately leading to the creation of LLMs that can truly understand and reason about the rich information conveyed in data visualizations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Unraveling the Truth: Do LLMs really Understand Charts? A Deep Dive into Consistency and Robustness
Srija Mukhopadhyay, Adnan Qidwai, Aparna Garimella, Pritika Ramu, Vivek Gupta, Dan Roth
Chart question answering (CQA) is a crucial area of Visual Language Understanding. However, the robustness and consistency of current Visual Language Models (VLMs) in this field remain under-explored. This paper evaluates state-of-the-art VLMs on comprehensive datasets, developed specifically for this study, encompassing diverse question categories and chart formats. We investigate two key aspects: 1) the models' ability to handle varying levels of chart and question complexity, and 2) their robustness across different visual representations of the same underlying data. Our analysis reveals significant performance variations based on question and chart types, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses of current models. Additionally, we identify areas for improvement and propose future research directions to build more robust and reliable CQA systems. This study sheds light on the limitations of current models and paves the way for future advancements in the field.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Advancing Multimodal Large Language Models in Chart Question Answering with Visualization-Referenced Instruction Tuning
Xingchen Zeng, Haichuan Lin, Yilin Ye, Wei Zeng
Emerging multimodal large language models (MLLMs) exhibit great potential for chart question answering (CQA). Recent efforts primarily focus on scaling up training datasets (i.e., charts, data tables, and question-answer (QA) pairs) through data collection and synthesis. However, our empirical study on existing MLLMs and CQA datasets reveals notable gaps. First, current data collection and synthesis focus on data volume and lack consideration of fine-grained visual encodings and QA tasks, resulting in unbalanced data distribution divergent from practical CQA scenarios. Second, existing work follows the training recipe of the base MLLMs initially designed for natural images, under-exploring the adaptation to unique chart characteristics, such as rich text elements. To fill the gap, we propose a visualization-referenced instruction tuning approach to guide the training dataset enhancement and model development. Specifically, we propose a novel data engine to effectively filter diverse and high-quality data from existing datasets and subsequently refine and augment the data using LLM-based generation techniques to better align with practical QA tasks and visual encodings. Then, to facilitate the adaptation to chart characteristics, we utilize the enriched data to train an MLLM by unfreezing the vision encoder and incorporating a mixture-of-resolution adaptation strategy for enhanced fine-grained recognition. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach. Even with fewer training examples, our model consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CQA models on established benchmarks. We also contribute a dataset split as a benchmark for future research. Source codes and datasets of this paper are available at https://github.com/zengxingchen/ChartQA-MLLM.
Read more8/13/2024
🤔
0
CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
Zirui Wang, Mengzhou Xia, Luxi He, Howard Chen, Yitao Liu, Richard Zhu, Kaiqu Liang, Xindi Wu, Haotian Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Alexis Chevalier, Sanjeev Arora, Danqi Chen
Chart understanding plays a pivotal role when applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to real-world tasks such as analyzing scientific papers or financial reports. However, existing datasets often focus on oversimplified and homogeneous charts with template-based questions, leading to an over-optimistic measure of progress. We demonstrate that although open-source models can appear to outperform strong proprietary models on these benchmarks, a simple stress test with slightly different charts or questions can deteriorate performance by up to 34.5%. In this work, we propose CharXiv, a comprehensive evaluation suite involving 2,323 natural, challenging, and diverse charts from arXiv papers. CharXiv includes two types of questions: 1) descriptive questions about examining basic chart elements and 2) reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across complex visual elements in the chart. To ensure quality, all charts and questions are handpicked, curated, and verified by human experts. Our results reveal a substantial, previously underestimated gap between the reasoning skills of the strongest proprietary model (i.e., GPT-4o), which achieves 47.1% accuracy, and the strongest open-source model (i.e., InternVL Chat V1.5), which achieves 29.2%. All models lag far behind human performance of 80.5%, underscoring weaknesses in the chart understanding capabilities of existing MLLMs. We hope CharXiv facilitates future research on MLLM chart understanding by providing a more realistic and faithful measure of progress. Project page and leaderboard: https://charxiv.github.io/
Read more6/27/2024
0
Enhancing Question Answering on Charts Through Effective Pre-training Tasks
Ashim Gupta, Vivek Gupta, Shuo Zhang, Yujie He, Ning Zhang, Shalin Shah
To completely understand a document, the use of textual information is not enough. Understanding visual cues, such as layouts and charts, is also required. While the current state-of-the-art approaches for document understanding (both OCR-based and OCR-free) work well, a thorough analysis of their capabilities and limitations has not yet been performed. Therefore, in this work, we addresses the limitation of current VisualQA models when applied to charts and plots. To investigate shortcomings of the state-of-the-art models, we conduct a comprehensive behavioral analysis, using ChartQA as a case study. Our findings indicate that existing models particularly underperform in answering questions related to the chart's structural and visual context, as well as numerical information. To address these issues, we propose three simple pre-training tasks that enforce the existing model in terms of both structural-visual knowledge, as well as its understanding of numerical questions. We evaluate our pre-trained model (called MatCha-v2) on three chart datasets - both extractive and abstractive question datasets - and observe that it achieves an average improvement of 1.7% over the baseline model.
Read more6/17/2024