Using Case Studies to Teach Responsible AI to Industry Practitioners

Read original: arXiv:2407.14686 - Published 7/25/2024 by Julia Stoyanovich, Rodrigo Kreis de Paula, Armanda Lewis, Chloe Zheng
Total Score

0

Using Case Studies to Teach Responsible AI to Industry Practitioners

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper discusses using case studies to teach responsible AI practices to industry practitioners.
  • The authors highlight the importance of educating industry professionals on responsible AI to promote the ethical development and deployment of AI systems.
  • The paper outlines the authors' approach of developing and deploying case studies that cover real-world examples of responsible AI challenges.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on how to effectively teach responsible AI practices to people working in industry, such as engineers, product managers, and executives. The authors recognize that as AI systems become more widely used in businesses and organizations, it's crucial for the people creating and deploying these technologies to understand the ethical considerations and potential negative impacts.

To address this need, the authors developed a series of case studies that illustrate real-world examples of responsible AI challenges. These case studies cover topics like algorithmic bias, privacy and data protection, and the importance of transparency and accountability.

By using these case studies in educational programs for industry practitioners, the authors aim to help these professionals understand the complexities of responsible AI and equip them with the knowledge and tools to develop and deploy AI systems in a more ethical and responsible manner.

Technical Explanation

The authors describe their approach of using case studies to teach responsible AI practices to industry practitioners. They explain that the case studies cover a range of real-world scenarios, such as issues with algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, and the need for transparency and accountability in AI systems.

The authors note that these case studies are designed to be interactive and engage participants in discussions and problem-solving activities. By presenting these real-world examples, the authors aim to help industry practitioners understand the complexities and challenges of responsible AI and develop the skills and knowledge needed to address them.

The paper also outlines the process of developing and deploying these case studies, including gathering feedback from industry partners and continuously iterating on the content and format to ensure it remains relevant and effective.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that while case studies can be a powerful tool for educating industry practitioners, there are some limitations to their approach. For example, the case studies may not cover the full breadth of responsible AI challenges that practitioners may encounter in their work.

Additionally, the authors note that the effectiveness of these case studies in driving long-term behavioral changes among industry professionals is an area that requires further research and evaluation.

Despite these limitations, the authors emphasize the importance of continued efforts to educate and empower industry practitioners on responsible AI practices, as this is a critical step in promoting the ethical development and deployment of AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the value of using case studies to teach responsible AI practices to industry professionals. By presenting real-world examples of responsible AI challenges, the authors aim to help these practitioners understand the complexities of the issue and develop the skills and knowledge needed to address them.

While the authors acknowledge some limitations to their approach, they emphasize the broader importance of educating industry professionals on responsible AI as a means of promoting the ethical development and deployment of these transformative technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Using Case Studies to Teach Responsible AI to Industry Practitioners
Total Score

0

Using Case Studies to Teach Responsible AI to Industry Practitioners

Julia Stoyanovich, Rodrigo Kreis de Paula, Armanda Lewis, Chloe Zheng

Responsible AI (RAI) is the science and the practice of making the design, development, and use of AI socially sustainable: of reaping the benefits of innovation while controlling the risks. Naturally, industry practitioners play a decisive role in our collective ability to achieve the goals of RAI. Unfortunately, we do not yet have consolidated educational materials and effective methodologies for teaching RAI to practitioners. In this paper, we propose a novel stakeholder-first educational approach that uses interactive case studies to achieve organizational and practitioner -level engagement and advance learning of RAI. We discuss a partnership with Meta, an international technology company, to co-develop and deliver RAI workshops to a diverse audience within the company. Our assessment results indicate that participants found the workshops engaging and reported a positive shift in understanding and motivation to apply RAI to their work.

Read more

7/25/2024

Responsible AI Question Bank: A Comprehensive Tool for AI Risk Assessment
Total Score

0

Responsible AI Question Bank: A Comprehensive Tool for AI Risk Assessment

Sung Une Lee, Harsha Perera, Yue Liu, Boming Xia, Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu

The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has underscored the urgent need for responsible AI practices. Despite increasing interest, a comprehensive AI risk assessment toolkit remains lacking. This study introduces our Responsible AI (RAI) Question Bank, a comprehensive framework and tool designed to support diverse AI initiatives. By integrating AI ethics principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability into a structured question format, the RAI Question Bank aids in identifying potential risks, aligning with emerging regulations like the EU AI Act, and enhancing overall AI governance. A key benefit of the RAI Question Bank is its systematic approach to linking lower-level risk questions to higher-level ones and related themes, preventing siloed assessments and ensuring a cohesive evaluation process. Case studies illustrate the practical application of the RAI Question Bank in assessing AI projects, from evaluating risk factors to informing decision-making processes. The study also demonstrates how the RAI Question Bank can be used to ensure compliance with standards, mitigate risks, and promote the development of trustworthy AI systems. This work advances RAI by providing organizations with a valuable tool to navigate the complexities of ethical AI development and deployment while ensuring comprehensive risk management.

Read more

8/23/2024

Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders
Total Score

0

Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders

Anna Kawakami, Daricia Wilkinson, Alexandra Chouldechova

The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts (e.g., Model Cards, Transparency Notes, Data Cards) to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems. While originally designed to scaffold and document AI development processes in technology companies, these artifacts are becoming central components of regulatory compliance under recent regulations such as the EU AI Act. Much prior work has explored the design of new RAI artifacts or their use by practitioners within technology companies. However, as RAI artifacts begin to play key roles in enabling external oversight, it becomes critical to understand how stakeholders--particularly those situated outside of technology companies who govern and audit industry AI deployments--perceive the efficacy of RAI artifacts. In this study, we conduct semi-structured interviews and design activities with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts. While participants believe that RAI artifacts are a valuable contribution to the broader AI governance ecosystem, many are concerned about their potential unintended, longer-term impacts on actors outside of technology companies (e.g., downstream end-users, policymakers, civil society stakeholders). We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry, impeding civil society and legal stakeholders' ability to protect downstream end-users from potential AI harms. Participants envision how structural changes, along with changes in how RAI artifacts are designed, used, and governed, could help redirect the role of artifacts to support more collaborative and proactive external oversight of AI systems. We discuss research and policy implications for RAI artifacts.

Read more

8/23/2024

Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges
Total Score

0

Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges

Maria Teresa Baldassarre, Domenico Gigante, Marcos Kalinowski, Azzurra Ragone, Sara Tibid`o

Recently, there has been growing attention on behalf of both academic and practice communities towards the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to operate responsibly and ethically. As a result, a plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications (TAI). However, little research has been done to investigate whether such frameworks are being used and how. In this work, we study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have - in terms of tools, knowledge, or guidelines - when they attempt to incorporate such principles into the systems they develop. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews, we systematically investigated practitioners' challenges and needs in developing TAI systems. Based on these practical findings, we highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.

Read more

7/18/2024