Using Large Language Models for Generating Smart Contracts for Health Insurance from Textual Policies

Overview

• This paper explores using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate application code that automates health insurance processes from text-based policies.
• The researchers target blockchain-based smart contracts, which offer immutability, verifiability, scalability, and a trustless setting.
• The methodology generates outputs at increasing levels of technical detail: (1) textual summaries, (2) declarative decision logic, and (3) smart contract code with unit tests.
• The researchers evaluate the LLM outputs using metrics like completeness, soundness, clarity, syntax, and functioning code.
• The evaluation employs three health insurance scenarios of increasing difficulty from Medicare's official booklet, using various LLMs like GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, and CodeLLaMA.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers in this paper wanted to see if large language models could be used to automatically generate computer code that could help with health insurance processes. They focused on a specific type of computer code called "smart contracts," which are used in blockchain technology.

Smart contracts have some unique features that make them useful for this task, like the fact that they are unchangeable, can be verified by anyone, and don't require the different parties to trust each other. The researchers tried to get the language models to produce different types of outputs, starting with simple summaries of the insurance policies, then more structured decision logic, and finally the actual smart contract code.

To evaluate how well the language models performed, the researchers looked at things like how complete and accurate the outputs were, how clear and easy to understand they were, and whether the final smart contract code could actually run and do what it was supposed to do. They tested this on three different health insurance scenarios of increasing complexity, using several different language models.

The key finding was that the language models were pretty good at generating the textual summaries, but the more technical outputs (the decision logic and smart contract code) still had some issues and required human oversight to make sure they were sound and would work properly. The researchers think this technology is still promising, but there's more work to be done, especially for more complex scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this paper explore using large language models (LLMs) to generate application code that automates health insurance processes from text-based policies. They target blockchain-based smart contracts as the target output, as these offer features like immutability, verifiability, scalability, and a trustless setting where multiple parties can interact without needing to establish trust relationships.

The methodology generates outputs at three increasing levels of technical detail:

1. Textual Summaries: LLMs are used to produce high-level natural language summaries of the insurance policies.
2. Declarative Decision Logic: LLMs generate more structured, rule-based representations of the policy details.
3. Smart Contract Code with Unit Tests: LLMs directly produce executable smart contract code, along with accompanying unit tests.

To assess the quality of the LLM outputs, the researchers propose metrics like completeness, soundness, clarity, syntax, and functioning code. Their evaluation employs three health insurance scenarios of increasing difficulty, taken from Medicare's official booklet. The LLMs used include GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16K, GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, and CodeLLaMA.

Critical Analysis

The researchers' findings confirm that LLMs perform quite well in generating the textual summaries (task 1). However, the outputs from the more technical tasks (2 and 3) still require human oversight, as even the runnable smart contract code may not yield sound results. The quality of the outputs also seems to be affected by the popularity and maturity of the target language (in this case, Solidity for Ethereum-based smart contracts).

Additionally, the researchers note that more complex insurance scenarios still appear to be a challenge for the current generation of LLMs. While the results demonstrate the promise of this approach, there are clearly limitations and areas for further research. Aspects like ensuring the soundness and correctness of the generated code, as well as handling more intricate policy details, will likely require advancements in language model capabilities and robustness.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to automate the generation of application code, specifically targeting blockchain-based smart contracts for health insurance processes. The researchers' methodology generates outputs at increasing levels of technical detail, from textual summaries to executable smart contract code.

While the LLMs performed well on the textual summarization task, the more technical outputs still require human oversight to ensure soundness and correctness. The researchers also note that the complexity of the insurance scenarios can be a challenge for current LLM capabilities.

Overall, the paper demonstrates the promise of using LLMs to bridge the gap between natural language policy descriptions and executable code, but also highlights the need for further advancements in language model performance and robustness to fully automate this process for more complex scenarios.