Efficacy of Various Large Language Models in Generating Smart Contracts
0
š¬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study analyzes the use of code-generating Large Language Models (LLMs) to create immutable Solidity smart contracts on the Ethereum Blockchain.
- Previous research, such as Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code and A Survey of Large Language Models for Code Generation, has explored the code generation capabilities of AI models.
- This paper aims to expand this research to the domain of smart contracts, where security and efficiency are crucial.
Plain English Explanation
This study looked at using advanced language AI models, called Large Language Models (LLMs), to automatically generate code for Ethereum smart contracts. Smart contracts are self-executing programs that run on the Ethereum blockchain and are used for various applications, from finance to gaming. The researchers wanted to see how well these AI models could create secure and efficient smart contract code, as this is an important requirement for real-world use.
Previous research had already shown that LLMs can generate regular computer code, but the researchers in this study wanted to see if the models could handle the unique challenges of smart contract programming, like ensuring the code is secure and runs efficiently on the blockchain.
The researchers found that the LLMs generally struggled to rigorously implement all the necessary security details in the smart contract code, but they were still able to successfully create many common types of smart contracts. The researchers also discovered some new ways of prompting the LLMs to generate smart contract code more effectively.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this study explored the use of code-generating Large Language Models to create Solidity smart contracts for the Ethereum blockchain. Solidity is a programming language specifically designed for writing Ethereum smart contracts, which are self-executing programs that run on the decentralized Ethereum network.
The researchers hypothesized that LLMs would have difficulty rigorously implementing the necessary security details in smart contract code, given the unique requirements and constraints of the Ethereum blockchain. To test this, they evaluated the performance of several LLM architectures on a variety of common smart contract use cases.
The results showed that while the LLMs struggled with certain aspects of secure smart contract development, they were still able to successfully generate many types of basic smart contracts. The researchers also discovered novel prompting strategies that could improve the LLMs' ability to generate secure and efficient smart contract code.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledged several limitations and caveats in their study. For example, they noted that the LLMs were not always able to correctly implement important security measures, such as access controls and input validation, which are critical for real-world smart contract applications.
Additionally, the researchers suggested that further research is needed to explore more advanced prompting techniques and model architectures that could better capture the nuances of secure smart contract programming. They also highlighted the need to conduct larger-scale evaluations and test the generated smart contracts on real-world Ethereum transactions to fully assess their robustness and reliability.
Overall, while the results of this study are promising, they also underscore the significant challenges involved in using LLMs for mission-critical applications like smart contract development, where security and correctness are of the utmost importance. Careful consideration and further research will be needed to overcome these hurdles before these AI-generated smart contracts can be deployed in production environments.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the potential of using code-generating Large Language Models to create Solidity smart contracts for the Ethereum blockchain, but also highlights the difficulties in ensuring the security and efficiency of these AI-generated programs.
The researchers found that while LLMs could generate many common types of smart contracts, they struggled to consistently implement crucial security measures. This suggests that more work is needed to develop LLM architectures and prompting strategies that can better capture the nuances of secure smart contract programming.
As AI-generated code continues to advance, it will be important for researchers and developers to carefully evaluate the capabilities and limitations of these models, especially when it comes to mission-critical applications like decentralized finance and blockchain-based infrastructure. By addressing these challenges, the full potential of AI-powered smart contract development can be realized.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
0
Efficacy of Various Large Language Models in Generating Smart Contracts
Siddhartha Chatterjee, Bina Ramamurthy
This study analyzes the application of code-generating Large Language Models in the creation of immutable Solidity smart contracts on the Ethereum Blockchain. Other works such as Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code, Mark Chen et. al (2012) have previously analyzed Artificial Intelligence code generation abilities. This paper aims to expand this to a larger scope to include programs where security and efficiency are of utmost priority such as smart contracts. The hypothesis leading into the study was that LLMs in general would have difficulty in rigorously implementing security details in the code, which was shown through our results, but surprisingly generally succeeded in many common types of contracts. We also discovered a novel way of generating smart contracts through new prompting strategies.
Read more7/17/2024
š¬
0
Using Large Language Models for Generating Smart Contracts for Health Insurance from Textual Policies
Inwon Kang, William Van Woensel, Oshani Seneviratne
We explore using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate application code that automates health insurance processes from text-based policies. We target blockchain-based smart contracts as they offer immutability, verifiability, scalability, and a trustless setting: any number of parties can use the smart contracts, and they need not have previously established trust relationships with each other. Our methodology generates outputs at increasing levels of technical detail: (1) textual summaries, (2) declarative decision logic, and (3) smart contract code with unit tests. We ascertain LLMs are good at the task (1), and the structured output is useful to validate tasks (2) and (3). Declarative languages (task 2) are often used to formalize healthcare policies, but their execution on blockchain is non-trivial. Hence, task (3) attempts to directly automate the process using smart contracts. To assess the LLM output, we propose completeness, soundness, clarity, syntax, and functioning code as metrics. Our evaluation employs three health insurance policies (scenarios) with increasing difficulty from Medicare's official booklet. Our evaluation uses GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16K, GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo and CodeLLaMA. Our findings confirm that LLMs perform quite well in generating textual summaries. Although outputs from tasks (2)-(3) are useful starting points, they require human oversight: in multiple cases, even runnable code will not yield sound results; the popularity of the target language affects the output quality; and more complex scenarios still seem a bridge too far. Nevertheless, our experiments demonstrate the promise of LLMs for translating textual process descriptions into smart contracts.
Read more7/10/2024
š¬
2
Evaluation of the Programming Skills of Large Language Models
Luc Bryan Heitz, Joun Chamas, Christopher Scherb
The advent of Large Language Models (LLM) has revolutionized the efficiency and speed with which tasks are completed, marking a significant leap in productivity through technological innovation. As these chatbots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the challenge of assessing the quality of their outputs has become paramount. This paper critically examines the output quality of two leading LLMs, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini AI, by comparing the quality of programming code generated in both their free versions. Through the lens of a real-world example coupled with a systematic dataset, we investigate the code quality produced by these LLMs. Given their notable proficiency in code generation, this aspect of chatbot capability presents a particularly compelling area for analysis. Furthermore, the complexity of programming code often escalates to levels where its verification becomes a formidable task, underscoring the importance of our study. This research aims to shed light on the efficacy and reliability of LLMs in generating high-quality programming code, an endeavor that has significant implications for the field of software development and beyond.
Read more5/24/2024
0
A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation
Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang, Jiasi Shen, Sungju Kim, Sunghun Kim
Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered remarkable advancements across diverse code-related tasks, known as Code LLMs, particularly in code generation that generates source code with LLM from natural language descriptions. This burgeoning field has captured significant interest from both academic researchers and industry professionals due to its practical significance in software development, e.g., GitHub Copilot. Despite the active exploration of LLMs for a variety of code tasks, either from the perspective of natural language processing (NLP) or software engineering (SE) or both, there is a noticeable absence of a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review dedicated to LLM for code generation. In this survey, we aim to bridge this gap by providing a systematic literature review that serves as a valuable reference for researchers investigating the cutting-edge progress in LLMs for code generation. We introduce a taxonomy to categorize and discuss the recent developments in LLMs for code generation, covering aspects such as data curation, latest advances, performance evaluation, and real-world applications. In addition, we present a historical overview of the evolution of LLMs for code generation and offer an empirical comparison using the widely recognized HumanEval and MBPP benchmarks to highlight the progressive enhancements in LLM capabilities for code generation. We identify critical challenges and promising opportunities regarding the gap between academia and practical development. Furthermore, we have established a dedicated resource website (https://codellm.github.io) to continuously document and disseminate the most recent advances in the field.
Read more6/4/2024