Using Synchronic Definitions and Semantic Relations to Classify Semantic Change Types

Overview

• This paper introduces a method for classifying different types of semantic change using synchronic definitions and semantic relations.
• The authors propose a taxonomy of semantic change types and demonstrate how their approach can be used to identify these changes.
• The work has implications for understanding how word meanings evolve over time and how language changes more broadly.

Plain English Explanation

Researchers often study how the meanings of words change over time, a phenomenon known as "semantic change." This paper explores a new way to classify the different types of semantic change that can occur.

The key idea is to look at the current, or "synchronic," definitions of words and the relationships between them (known as "semantic relations"). By analyzing these factors, the authors were able to develop a taxonomy - or classification system - for different kinds of semantic change.

For example, one type of change might be when a word takes on a new, additional meaning while retaining its original meaning (e.g., the word "mouse" referring to both the animal and a computer device). Another type could be when a word completely shifts to a new meaning, leaving behind its original sense (e.g., "gay" originally meaning "happy" but now primarily meaning "homosexual").

Understanding these patterns of semantic change can provide insights into how language evolves over time and how word meanings are influenced by the broader context in which they are used. This research could have applications in fields like lexical semantic distance metric learning, analyzing semantic change through lexical replacements, and modeling diachronic sense change.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a taxonomy of semantic change types based on two key factors: synchronic definitions and semantic relations. They define several types of semantic change, including:

1. Broadening: When a word takes on additional meanings while retaining its original sense (e.g., "mouse" referring to both the animal and a computer device).
2. Narrowing: When a word's meaning becomes more specific, losing some of its original senses.
3. Shift: When a word completely changes its meaning, abandoning the original sense (e.g., "gay" shifting from "happy" to "homosexual").
4. Amelioration: When a word's meaning becomes more positive over time.
5. Pejoration: When a word's meaning becomes more negative over time.

To identify these types of semantic change, the authors analyze the current definitions of words and the semantic relations (e.g., hyponymy, meronymy) between them. They demonstrate the application of their taxonomy on a set of example words, showing how their approach can be used to classify different patterns of semantic change.

This work builds on previous research in areas like speakers filling lexical semantic gaps in context and structured metaphor and metonymy in WordNet, contributing a new framework for understanding the evolution of word meanings.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a comprehensive taxonomy of semantic change types, which is a valuable contribution to the field. However, the paper does not address several potential limitations:

1. Subjectivity in Definition Interpretation: The authors rely on synchronic dictionary definitions, which can be subjective and may not capture all nuances of word usage. This could impact the accuracy of their classification.
2. Contextual Factors: The paper does not consider how semantic change can be influenced by broader contextual factors, such as sociocultural changes or shifts in language use.
3. Diachronic Analysis: The study is primarily synchronic, focusing on current word meanings. Incorporating diachronic analysis (i.e., tracing word meanings over time) could provide a more complete understanding of semantic change.
4. Language Diversity: The paper's examples and analysis are limited to English, so the generalizability of the taxonomy to other languages is unclear.

Future research could address these limitations by incorporating more diverse data sources, exploring contextual influences on semantic change, and conducting cross-linguistic comparisons to validate the proposed taxonomy.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to classifying different types of semantic change using synchronic definitions and semantic relations. The proposed taxonomy provides a structured way to understand how word meanings evolve over time, with potential applications in fields like lexical semantic distance metric learning, analyzing semantic change through lexical replacements, and modeling diachronic sense change.

While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on a set of example words, further research is needed to address the limitations of the study and explore the broader implications of semantic change for understanding language evolution and its impact on society.