Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change

Read original: arXiv:2402.19088 - Published 7/19/2024 by Jader Martins Camboim de S'a, Marcos Da Silveira, C'edric Pruski
Total Score

0

Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the current research on the characterization of semantic change, which is the evolution of word meanings over time.
  • It covers various approaches to identifying and analyzing lexical semantic changes, including using synchronic definitions and semantic relations to classify, developing a multidimensional framework for evaluating lexical semantic change, analyzing semantic change through lexical replacements, and detecting historical semantic shift in 19th-century texts.
  • The paper also discusses the challenges and limitations of current methods, as well as potential avenues for future research in this rapidly evolving field.

Plain English Explanation

Semantic change refers to how the meanings of words can shift over time. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the different ways researchers have been studying and characterizing these changes in word meanings.

One approach involves using the definitions and relationships between words at a given time to classify how a word's meaning has changed. Another method looks at the broader social and contextual factors that contribute to a word's evolving usage. Researchers have also analyzed how new words replace old ones as meanings change, and have developed techniques to detect subtle shifts in word meanings over long periods of historical texts.

The paper highlights the complexity of this topic and the various challenges researchers face in trying to understand and model semantic change. It also points to promising directions for future work, such as incorporating more nuanced understanding of the social and linguistic factors that drive word meanings to change.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by introducing the concept of lexical semantic change and its importance in historical linguistics and natural language processing. It then provides an in-depth review of the various methodologies that have been proposed to identify and characterize these changes.

One category of approaches focuses on using the synchronic definitions and semantic relations between words at a given time to classify how a word's meaning has shifted. Other methods take a more holistic, multidimensional view of lexical semantic change, considering factors like frequency, emotion, and social context.

The paper also covers techniques that analyze semantic change through patterns of lexical replacement, as well as novel approaches to detecting historical semantic shift in large text corpora.

Throughout the survey, the authors highlight the key insights, strengths, and limitations of each methodological approach, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of the field.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and balanced review of the various techniques used to study semantic change. It acknowledges the inherent complexity of this topic, with word meanings being influenced by a variety of linguistic, social, and cultural factors.

One limitation noted is the reliance of many approaches on modern, digitized text corpora, which may not fully capture historical language usage. The authors suggest that further research is needed to develop methods that can better handle the sparsity and noise often present in older textual data.

Additionally, the paper highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the cognitive and psychological mechanisms underlying semantic change. While current computational approaches can identify patterns of change, there is still much to be learned about the specific drivers and processes that lead words to evolve in meaning over time.

Overall, the survey provides a valuable resource for researchers in this field, while also encouraging critical thinking about the assumptions and limitations of existing methodologies. By identifying areas for further exploration, the paper sets the stage for continued advancements in the characterization of semantic change.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey paper provides a thorough overview of the current state of research on the characterization of semantic change. It covers a wide range of methodological approaches, from using synchronic definitions and semantic relations to analyze shifts in word meanings, to developing multidimensional frameworks that consider the social and contextual factors driving lexical evolution.

The paper highlights the complexity of this topic and the challenges researchers face in accurately modeling the dynamic nature of language. It also points to promising directions for future work, such as incorporating more historical data and deepening our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying semantic change.

By synthesizing the latest advancements in this rapidly evolving field, the survey serves as an invaluable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding and tracking the evolution of word meanings. Its balanced critique and forward-looking perspective will help drive continued progress in the characterization of semantic change.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change
Total Score

0

Survey in Characterization of Semantic Change

Jader Martins Camboim de S'a, Marcos Da Silveira, C'edric Pruski

Live languages continuously evolve to integrate the cultural change of human societies. This evolution manifests through neologisms (new words) or textbf{semantic changes} of words (new meaning to existing words). Understanding the meaning of words is vital for interpreting texts coming from different cultures (regionalism or slang), domains (e.g., technical terms), or periods. In computer science, these words are relevant to computational linguistics algorithms such as translation, information retrieval, question answering, etc. Semantic changes can potentially impact the quality of the outcomes of these algorithms. Therefore, it is important to understand and characterize these changes formally. The study of this impact is a recent problem that has attracted the attention of the computational linguistics community. Several approaches propose methods to detect semantic changes with good precision, but more effort is needed to characterize how the meaning of words changes and to reason about how to reduce the impact of semantic change. This survey provides an understandable overview of existing approaches to the textit{characterization of semantic changes} and also formally defines three classes of characterizations: if the meaning of a word becomes more general or narrow (change in dimension) if the word is used in a more pejorative or positive/ameliorated sense (change in orientation), and if there is a trend to use the word in a, for instance, metaphoric or metonymic context (change in relation). We summarized the main aspects of the selected publications in a table and discussed the needs and trends in the research activities on semantic change characterization.

Read more

7/19/2024

Semantic Change Characterization with LLMs using Rhetorics
Total Score

0

Semantic Change Characterization with LLMs using Rhetorics

Jader Martins Camboim de S'a, Marcos Da Silveira, C'edric Pruski

Languages continually evolve in response to societal events, resulting in new terms and shifts in meanings. These changes have significant implications for computer applications, including automatic translation and chatbots, making it essential to characterize them accurately. The recent development of LLMs has notably advanced natural language understanding, particularly in sense inference and reasoning. In this paper, we investigate the potential of LLMs in characterizing three types of semantic change: dimension, relation, and orientation. We achieve this by combining LLMs' Chain-of-Thought with rhetorical devices and conducting an experimental assessment of our approach using newly created datasets. Our results highlight the effectiveness of LLMs in capturing and analyzing semantic changes, providing valuable insights to improve computational linguistic applications.

Read more

7/24/2024

Using Synchronic Definitions and Semantic Relations to Classify Semantic Change Types
Total Score

0

Using Synchronic Definitions and Semantic Relations to Classify Semantic Change Types

Pierluigi Cassotti, Stefano De Pascale, Nina Tahmasebi

There is abundant evidence of the fact that the way words change their meaning can be classified in different types of change, highlighting the relationship between the old and new meanings (among which generalization, specialization and co-hyponymy transfer). In this paper, we present a way of detecting these types of change by constructing a model that leverages information both from synchronic lexical relations and definitions of word meanings. Specifically, we use synset definitions and hierarchy information from WordNet and test it on a digitized version of Blank's (1997) dataset of semantic change types. Finally, we show how the sense relationships can improve models for both approximation of human judgments of semantic relatedness as well as binary Lexical Semantic Change Detection.

Read more

6/12/2024

A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Lexical Semantic Change with Social Science Applications
Total Score

0

A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Lexical Semantic Change with Social Science Applications

Naomi Baes, Nick Haslam, Ekaterina Vylomova

Historical linguists have identified multiple forms of lexical semantic change. We present a three-dimensional framework for integrating these forms and a unified computational methodology for evaluating them concurrently. The dimensions represent increases or decreases in semantic 1) sentiment, 2) breadth, and 3) intensity. These dimensions can be complemented by the evaluation of shifts in the frequency of the target words and the thematic content of its collocates. This framework enables lexical semantic change to be mapped economically and systematically and has applications in computational social science. We present an illustrative analysis of semantic shifts in mental health and mental illness in two corpora, demonstrating patterns of semantic change that illuminate contemporary concerns about pathologization, stigma, and concept creep.

Read more

6/11/2024