Validating an Instrument for Teachers' Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Overview

• This paper describes the development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers' acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in education.
• The researchers used a rigorous process, including focus groups, expert reviews, and statistical analyses, to create a valid and reliable measure of teachers' perceptions of AI in the classroom.
• The resulting instrument can be used to better understand teachers' readiness and attitudes towards incorporating AI technologies into their teaching practices.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on creating a tool to measure how willing and open teachers are to using artificial intelligence (AI) in their classrooms. The researchers recognized that as AI technologies continue to advance, it's important to understand teachers' perspectives on this. They wanted to develop a reliable way to assess teachers' acceptance of AI, including factors like their beliefs about its usefulness, ease of use, and potential impacts.

To create this measurement tool, the researchers went through several steps. First, they held discussions with teachers to get their input on important issues related to AI in education. Then, they had experts review the draft instrument to make sure it was well-designed. Finally, they used statistical analysis to refine and validate the survey, ensuring it accurately captured teachers' views.

This validated instrument can now be used by researchers and schools to better understand how teachers feel about incorporating AI into their teaching. This knowledge can then inform efforts to help teachers feel more comfortable and confident using these new technologies in their classrooms.

Technical Explanation

The researchers followed a multi-stage process to develop and validate an instrument for measuring teachers' acceptance of AI in education. First, they conducted focus groups with pre-service teachers to identify key factors influencing TAAI. This informed the initial item pool for the survey instrument.

Next, the researchers had the draft instrument reviewed by a panel of experts, who provided feedback to improve the content and wording of the items. They then administered the revised survey to a sample of 366 pre-service teachers and conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

The analyses revealed a four-factor structure underlying TAAI: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions. The final 20-item instrument demonstrated good reliability and validity, supporting its use as a measure of teachers' acceptance of AI in educational contexts.

Critical Analysis

The researchers took a comprehensive and rigorous approach to developing and validating the TAAI instrument. By grounding the item generation in focus group discussions with teachers, they ensured the survey captured salient factors influencing acceptance. The expert review and statistical analyses further strengthened the instrument's content and construct validity.

However, the sample was limited to pre-service teachers, so the instrument's applicability to in-service teachers remains to be seen. Additionally, the study did not explore how TAAI might differ across subject areas or grade levels, which could provide valuable insights for targeted professional development efforts.

Future research could also investigate the relationship between TAAI and actual AI adoption and integration in classrooms. This would help determine the predictive validity of the instrument and its usefulness for identifying potential barriers to AI implementation.

Conclusion

This study provides a well-validated instrument for measuring teachers' acceptance of AI in education. The four-factor structure offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the key drivers of TAAI, which can inform the design of AI-based educational tools and training programs to better support teachers' needs and concerns. As AI continues to evolve in the classroom, this instrument can be a valuable tool for researchers and educators to assess and address teachers' readiness to adopt these emerging technologies.