Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Metrology
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the importance of trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of metrology, which is the science of measurement.
- The authors examine the challenges and considerations involved in ensuring AI systems used in metrology applications are reliable, transparent, and accountable.
- Key topics covered include the role of benchmarking, standardization, and certification in promoting trustworthy AI in metrology.
Plain English Explanation
Metrology is the scientific study of measurement - ensuring things are measured accurately and consistently. As AI systems become more widely used in metrology applications, it's crucial that these AI systems can be trusted to provide reliable and unbiased measurements.
The paper looks at how we can ensure AI used in metrology is "trustworthy" - meaning it behaves in a way that is reliable, transparent, and accountable. The authors explore the importance of benchmarking AI systems, creating standards for trustworthy AI, and having certification processes to verify AI systems meet those standards.
By addressing these issues, the paper aims to help build confidence in using AI for critical measurement tasks, where accuracy and reliability are paramount. This is an important step in realizing the full potential of AI to enhance metrology and scientific discovery more broadly.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the key considerations for ensuring trustworthy AI in the context of metrology applications. The authors highlight the need for robust benchmarking of AI systems to assess their reliability, accuracy, and performance under different conditions.
They also emphasize the role of standardization in establishing common definitions, requirements, and best practices for trustworthy AI in metrology. This includes standards around transparency, explainability, and accountability of AI systems.
Finally, the paper explores certification processes that can independently verify whether AI systems meet the specified standards for trustworthiness. This third-party validation is crucial for building confidence in the use of AI for critical metrology applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling argument for the importance of trustworthy AI in metrology, where accurate and reliable measurements are essential. The authors acknowledge the significant challenges involved, such as the complexity of many AI systems and the difficulty of establishing universal standards.
One potential limitation raised is the need for ongoing monitoring and re-evaluation of certified AI systems, as they may change or drift over time. The authors suggest the need for dynamic certification processes to address this concern.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical details of the benchmarking, standardization, and certification approaches. Further research may be needed to develop robust, practical frameworks for implementing these processes in real-world metrology settings.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the critical need to ensure AI systems used in metrology applications are trustworthy - meaning they are reliable, transparent, and accountable. By addressing the challenges around benchmarking, standardization, and certification, the authors aim to build confidence in the use of AI to enhance measurement science and support scientific progress more broadly.
As AI becomes more pervasive in various domains, establishing clear frameworks for trustworthy AI will be essential to realize the full benefits of this transformative technology while mitigating potential risks. This paper makes an important contribution to this ongoing journey towards trustworthy AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Metrology
Tameem Adel, Sam Bilson, Mark Levene, Andrew Thompson
We review research at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in the area of trustworthy artificial intelligence (TAI), and more specifically trustworthy machine learning (TML), in the context of metrology, the science of measurement. We describe three broad themes of TAI: technical, socio-technical and social, which play key roles in ensuring that the developed models are trustworthy and can be relied upon to make responsible decisions. From a metrology perspective we emphasise uncertainty quantification (UQ), and its importance within the framework of TAI to enhance transparency and trust in the outputs of AI systems. We then discuss three research areas within TAI that we are working on at NPL, and examine the certification of AI systems in terms of adherence to the characteristics of TAI.
Read more6/17/2024
🤖
0
Fostering Trust and Quantifying Value of AI and ML
Dalmo Cirne, Veena Calambur
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) providers have a responsibility to develop valid and reliable systems. Much has been discussed about trusting AI and ML inferences (the process of running live data through a trained AI model to make a prediction or solve a task), but little has been done to define what that means. Those in the space of ML- based products are familiar with topics such as transparency, explainability, safety, bias, and so forth. Yet, there are no frameworks to quantify and measure those. Producing ever more trustworthy machine learning inferences is a path to increase the value of products (i.e., increased trust in the results) and to engage in conversations with users to gather feedback to improve products. In this paper, we begin by examining the dynamic of trust between a provider (Trustor) and users (Trustees). Trustors are required to be trusting and trustworthy, whereas trustees need not be trusting nor trustworthy. The challenge for trustors is to provide results that are good enough to make a trustee increase their level of trust above a minimum threshold for: 1- doing business together; 2- continuation of service. We conclude by defining and proposing a framework, and a set of viable metrics, to be used for computing a trust score and objectively understand how trustworthy a machine learning system can claim to be, plus their behavior over time.
Read more7/9/2024
0
The Journey to Trustworthy AI- Part 1: Pursuit of Pragmatic Frameworks
Mohamad M Nasr-Azadani, Jean-Luc Chatelain
This paper reviews Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI) and its various definitions. Considering the principles respected in any society, TAI is often characterized by a few attributes, some of which have led to confusion in regulatory or engineering contexts. We argue against using terms such as Responsible or Ethical AI as substitutes for TAI. And to help clarify any confusion, we suggest leaving them behind. Given the subjectivity and complexity inherent in TAI, developing a universal framework is deemed infeasible. Instead, we advocate for approaches centered on addressing key attributes and properties such as fairness, bias, risk, security, explainability, and reliability. We examine the ongoing regulatory landscape, with a focus on initiatives in the EU, China, and the USA. We recognize that differences in AI regulations based on geopolitical and geographical reasons pose an additional challenge for multinational companies. We identify risk as a core factor in AI regulation and TAI. For example, as outlined in the EU-AI Act, organizations must gauge the risk level of their AI products to act accordingly (or risk hefty fines). We compare modalities of TAI implementation and how multiple cross-functional teams are engaged in the overall process. Thus, a brute force approach for enacting TAI renders its efficiency and agility, moot. To address this, we introduce our framework Set-Formalize-Measure-Act (SFMA). Our solution highlights the importance of transforming TAI-aware metrics, drivers of TAI, stakeholders, and business/legal requirements into actual benchmarks or tests. Finally, over-regulation driven by panic of powerful AI models can, in fact, harm TAI too. Based on GitHub user-activity data, in 2023, AI open-source projects rose to top projects by contributor account. Enabling innovation in TAI hinges on the independent contributions of the open-source community.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges
Maria Teresa Baldassarre, Domenico Gigante, Marcos Kalinowski, Azzurra Ragone, Sara Tibid`o
Recently, there has been growing attention on behalf of both academic and practice communities towards the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to operate responsibly and ethically. As a result, a plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications (TAI). However, little research has been done to investigate whether such frameworks are being used and how. In this work, we study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have - in terms of tools, knowledge, or guidelines - when they attempt to incorporate such principles into the systems they develop. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews, we systematically investigated practitioners' challenges and needs in developing TAI systems. Based on these practical findings, we highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.
Read more7/18/2024