Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing
2406.06864
0
0
Abstract
The latest paradigm shift in software development brings in the innovation and automation afforded by Large Language Models (LLMs), showcased by Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), which has shown remarkable capacity to generate code autonomously, significantly reducing the manual effort required for various programming tasks. Although, the potential benefits of LLM-generated code are vast, most notably in efficiency and rapid prototyping, as LLMs become increasingly integrated into the software development lifecycle and hence the supply chain, complex and multifaceted challenges arise as the code generated from these language models carry profound questions on quality and correctness. Research is required to comprehensively explore these critical concerns surrounding LLM-generated code. In this paper, we propose a novel solution called metamorphic prompt testing to address these challenges. Our intuitive observation is that intrinsic consistency always exists among correct code pieces but may not exist among flawed code pieces, so we can detect flaws in the code by detecting inconsistencies. Therefore, we can vary a given prompt to multiple prompts with paraphrasing, and to ask the LLM to acquire multiple versions of generated code, so that we can validate whether the semantic relations still hold in the acquired code through cross-validation. Our evaluation on HumanEval shows that metamorphic prompt testing is able to detect 75 percent of the erroneous programs generated by GPT-4, with a false positive rate of 8.6 percent.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This research paper explores the use of metamorphic prompt testing to validate programs generated by large language models (LLMs).
ā¢ The authors propose a technique called "metamorphic prompt testing" to systematically test the correctness and robustness of LLM-generated programs by generating multiple variations of the original prompt and checking if the generated programs exhibit the expected behavior.
ā¢ The paper presents a case study demonstrating the application of this technique to validate the outputs of an LLM-based code generation system.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in generating human-like text, including computer programs. However, validating the correctness and robustness of these generated programs can be challenging. The authors of this paper introduce a technique called "metamorphic prompt testing" to address this issue.
Metamorphic prompt testing involves creating multiple variations of the original prompt used to generate a program, and then checking whether the generated programs exhibit the expected behavior. For example, if you ask an LLM to generate a program that calculates the sum of two numbers, you can create variations of the prompt, such as asking for the sum of different numbers or phrasing the request in different ways. By comparing the outputs of these variations, you can identify whether the LLM-generated programs are consistent and behave as expected.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through a case study where they use metamorphic prompt testing to validate the outputs of an LLM-based code generation system. This technique can help ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of LLM-generated programs, which is crucial as these models become more widely used in real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a technique called "metamorphic prompt testing" to validate the correctness and robustness of programs generated by large language models (LLMs). Metamorphic testing is a software testing approach that involves creating multiple variations of the original test case and checking whether the system under test exhibits the expected behavior across these variations.
In the context of LLM-generated programs, the researchers apply this idea by generating multiple variations of the original prompt used to generate a program and then checking whether the generated programs exhibit the expected behavior. For example, if the original prompt asked the LLM to generate a program that calculates the sum of two numbers, the researchers would create variations of this prompt, such as asking for the sum of different numbers or phrasing the request in different ways.
The paper presents a case study where the authors apply this metamorphic prompt testing technique to validate the outputs of an LLM-based code generation system. They evaluate the generated programs' correctness, robustness, and security properties by considering various types of prompt variations, such as changing the variable names, modifying the problem statement, or introducing edge cases.
The results of the case study demonstrate the effectiveness of metamorphic prompt testing in identifying issues with the LLM-generated programs, such as inconsistencies, security vulnerabilities, and lack of robustness. The authors also discuss the implications of their findings and the potential for this technique to be used as a tool for improving the reliability and trustworthiness of LLM-generated programs.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to validating the correctness and robustness of LLM-generated programs. The authors' use of metamorphic prompt testing is a novel and promising technique that addresses an important challenge in the field of LLM-based code generation.
One potential limitation of the study is the scope of the case study, which focuses on a specific LLM-based code generation system. While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach in this context, it would be valuable to see the technique applied to a wider range of LLM-based code generation systems to assess its general applicability.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the scalability of the metamorphic prompt testing approach, especially as the complexity and size of the generated programs increase. Exploring the computational and resource requirements of this technique for larger-scale applications would be an important area for future research.
Another area for further investigation is the relationship between the quality and diversity of the training data used to fine-tune the LLM and the effectiveness of metamorphic prompt testing. Understanding how the model's training and fine-tuning processes influence the reliability of the generated programs could provide valuable insights for improving the overall system.
Despite these potential limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of LLM-based code generation by introducing a novel validation technique that can help improve the trustworthiness and reliability of these systems. The findings and the proposed approach have the potential to drive further advancements in this rapidly evolving area of research.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a novel technique called "metamorphic prompt testing" to validate the correctness and robustness of programs generated by large language models (LLMs). The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through a case study, highlighting its potential to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of LLM-based code generation systems.
The paper's key contribution is the systematic approach to testing the behavior of LLM-generated programs by creating variations of the original prompt and checking for consistent and expected outputs. This technique can help identify issues such as inconsistencies, security vulnerabilities, and lack of robustness, which are crucial for ensuring the safe and reliable deployment of LLM-generated programs in real-world applications.
As LLMs continue to advance and their use in code generation becomes more widespread, the findings and the proposed validation approach presented in this paper will become increasingly important. The paper lays the groundwork for further research and development in this area, with the potential to enhance the overall quality and reliability of LLM-based code generation systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Code-Aware Prompting: A study of Coverage Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLM
Gabriel Ryan, Siddhartha Jain, Mingyue Shang, Shiqi Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Baishakhi Ray
0
0
Testing plays a pivotal role in ensuring software quality, yet conventional Search Based Software Testing (SBST) methods often struggle with complex software units, achieving suboptimal test coverage. Recent works using large language models (LLMs) for test generation have focused on improving generation quality through optimizing the test generation context and correcting errors in model outputs, but use fixed prompting strategies that prompt the model to generate tests without additional guidance. As a result LLM-generated testsuites still suffer from low coverage. In this paper, we present SymPrompt, a code-aware prompting strategy for LLMs in test generation. SymPrompt's approach is based on recent work that demonstrates LLMs can solve more complex logical problems when prompted to reason about the problem in a multi-step fashion. We apply this methodology to test generation by deconstructing the testsuite generation process into a multi-stage sequence, each of which is driven by a specific prompt aligned with the execution paths of the method under test, and exposing relevant type and dependency focal context to the model. Our approach enables pretrained LLMs to generate more complete test cases without any additional training. We implement SymPrompt using the TreeSitter parsing framework and evaluate on a benchmark challenging methods from open source Python projects. SymPrompt enhances correct test generations by a factor of 5 and bolsters relative coverage by 26% for CodeGen2. Notably, when applied to GPT-4, SymPrompt improves coverage by over 2x compared to baseline prompting strategies.
4/4/2024
Syntactic Robustness for LLM-based Code Generation
Laboni Sarker, Mara Downing, Achintya Desai, Tevfik Bultan
0
0
Rapid advances in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs) have made LLM-based code generation an important area for investigation. An LLM-based code generator takes a prompt as input and produces code that implements the requirements specified in the prompt. Many software requirements include mathematical formulas that specify the expected behavior of the code to be generated. Given a code generation prompt that includes a mathematical formula, a reasonable expectation is that, if the formula is syntactically modified without changing its semantics, the generated code for the modified prompt should be semantically equivalent. We formalize this concept as syntactic robustness and investigate the syntactic robustness of GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4 as code generators. To test syntactic robustness, we generate syntactically different but semantically equivalent versions of prompts using a set of mutators that only modify mathematical formulas in prompts. In this paper, we focus on prompts that ask for code that generates solutions to variables in an equation, when given coefficients of the equation as input. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4 are not syntactically robust for this type of prompts. To improve syntactic robustness, we define a set of reductions that transform the formulas to a simplified form and use these reductions as a pre-processing step. Our experimental results indicate that the syntactic robustness of LLM-based code generation can be improved using our approach.
4/3/2024
š
Chain of Targeted Verification Questions to Improve the Reliability of Code Generated by LLMs
Sylvain Kouemo Ngassom, Arghavan Moradi Dakhel, Florian Tambon, Foutse Khomh
0
0
LLM-based assistants, such as GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT, have the potential to generate code that fulfills a programming task described in a natural language description, referred to as a prompt. The widespread accessibility of these assistants enables users with diverse backgrounds to generate code and integrate it into software projects. However, studies show that code generated by LLMs is prone to bugs and may miss various corner cases in task specifications. Presenting such buggy code to users can impact their reliability and trust in LLM-based assistants. Moreover, significant efforts are required by the user to detect and repair any bug present in the code, especially if no test cases are available. In this study, we propose a self-refinement method aimed at improving the reliability of code generated by LLMs by minimizing the number of bugs before execution, without human intervention, and in the absence of test cases. Our approach is based on targeted Verification Questions (VQs) to identify potential bugs within the initial code. These VQs target various nodes within the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) of the initial code, which have the potential to trigger specific types of bug patterns commonly found in LLM-generated code. Finally, our method attempts to repair these potential bugs by re-prompting the LLM with the targeted VQs and the initial code. Our evaluation, based on programming tasks in the CoderEval dataset, demonstrates that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by decreasing the number of targeted errors in the code between 21% to 62% and improving the number of executable code instances to 13%.
5/24/2024
š
CSEPrompts: A Benchmark of Introductory Computer Science Prompts
Nishat Raihan, Dhiman Goswami, Sadiya Sayara Chowdhury Puspo, Christian Newman, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri
0
0
Recent advances in AI, machine learning, and NLP have led to the development of a new generation of Large Language Models (LLMs) that are trained on massive amounts of data and often have trillions of parameters. Commercial applications (e.g., ChatGPT) have made this technology available to the general public, thus making it possible to use LLMs to produce high-quality texts for academic and professional purposes. Schools and universities are aware of the increasing use of AI-generated content by students and they have been researching the impact of this new technology and its potential misuse. Educational programs in Computer Science (CS) and related fields are particularly affected because LLMs are also capable of generating programming code in various programming languages. To help understand the potential impact of publicly available LLMs in CS education, we introduce CSEPrompts, a framework with hundreds of programming exercise prompts and multiple-choice questions retrieved from introductory CS and programming courses. We also provide experimental results on CSEPrompts to evaluate the performance of several LLMs with respect to generating Python code and answering basic computer science and programming questions.
4/5/2024