Chain of Targeted Verification Questions to Improve the Reliability of Code Generated by LLMs
2405.13932
0
0
š
Abstract
LLM-based assistants, such as GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT, have the potential to generate code that fulfills a programming task described in a natural language description, referred to as a prompt. The widespread accessibility of these assistants enables users with diverse backgrounds to generate code and integrate it into software projects. However, studies show that code generated by LLMs is prone to bugs and may miss various corner cases in task specifications. Presenting such buggy code to users can impact their reliability and trust in LLM-based assistants. Moreover, significant efforts are required by the user to detect and repair any bug present in the code, especially if no test cases are available. In this study, we propose a self-refinement method aimed at improving the reliability of code generated by LLMs by minimizing the number of bugs before execution, without human intervention, and in the absence of test cases. Our approach is based on targeted Verification Questions (VQs) to identify potential bugs within the initial code. These VQs target various nodes within the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) of the initial code, which have the potential to trigger specific types of bug patterns commonly found in LLM-generated code. Finally, our method attempts to repair these potential bugs by re-prompting the LLM with the targeted VQs and the initial code. Our evaluation, based on programming tasks in the CoderEval dataset, demonstrates that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by decreasing the number of targeted errors in the code between 21% to 62% and improving the number of executable code instances to 13%.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large Language Model (LLM)-based assistants like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT can generate code from natural language descriptions, enabling users with diverse backgrounds to create software.
- However, studies show that LLM-generated code can have bugs and miss corner cases in task specifications, which can undermine user trust and reliability.
- Detecting and repairing these bugs can be challenging, especially without test cases.
- This study proposes a self-refinement method to improve the reliability of LLM-generated code by minimizing bugs before execution, without human intervention and in the absence of test cases.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot have become powerful tools for generating code. Users can simply describe what they want the code to do in plain language, and the LLM will attempt to write the necessary code. This makes coding more accessible to people who may not have a lot of programming experience.
However, the code generated by these LLMs can sometimes have bugs or miss important details. This can be a problem, as users may then incorporate the buggy code into their software projects, leading to reliability and trust issues. Fixing these bugs can also be difficult, especially if there are no test cases available to help identify the problems.
To address this, the researchers in this study developed a method to improve the reliability of LLM-generated code. Their approach uses targeted "verification questions" to identify potential bugs in the initial code. These questions target specific parts of the code's structure, looking for common types of bugs that tend to show up in LLM-generated code. The system then tries to fix these potential bugs by re-prompting the LLM with the verification questions and the original code.
The researchers tested this method on a dataset of programming tasks and found that it was able to reduce the number of targeted errors in the code by 21% to 62%, and improve the number of executable code instances by 13%. This suggests that their self-refinement approach can help make LLM-generated code more reliable and trustworthy, without requiring human intervention or test cases.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a self-refinement method to improve the reliability of code generated by Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. LLM-based assistants can generate code from natural language descriptions, but studies have shown that the generated code is prone to bugs and may miss various corner cases in task specifications.
The key components of the researchers' approach are:
-
Verification Questions (VQs): These are targeted questions that aim to identify potential bugs within the initial code generated by the LLM. The VQs target different nodes in the code's Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), looking for patterns that commonly lead to bugs in LLM-generated code.
-
Self-refinement Process: The system re-prompts the LLM with the initial code and the targeted VQs, in an attempt to repair the potential bugs identified by the VQs. This self-refinement process is performed without any human intervention and in the absence of test cases.
The researchers evaluated their approach using the CoderEval dataset, which contains programming tasks. Their results show that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches by decreasing the number of targeted errors in the code between 21% to 62% and improving the number of executable code instances to 13%.
This research is significant because it addresses a critical challenge in the widespread adoption of LLM-based code generation: the reliability and trustworthiness of the generated code. By introducing a self-refinement method that can identify and fix potential bugs without human intervention, the researchers have made an important step towards improving the practical usability of these powerful AI-driven coding assistants.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have presented a novel approach to improving the reliability of LLM-generated code, which is an important and timely issue as these technologies become more widely adopted. Their use of targeted Verification Questions to identify potential bugs, and the subsequent self-refinement process to repair these issues, is a clever and promising solution.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on a specific set of bug patterns, as identified by the Verification Questions. While this approach appears effective, it's possible that there are other types of bugs or edge cases that are not covered by the current set of VQs. Expanding the range of bug patterns and verification mechanisms could further improve the reliability of the generated code.
Additionally, the researchers only evaluated their method on the CoderEval dataset, which may not fully represent the diversity of programming tasks and code structures encountered in real-world software development. Validating the approach on a broader range of datasets and use cases would help strengthen the generalizability of the findings.
Another area for further research could be exploring the integration of this self-refinement method with other code quality assurance techniques, such as automated testing or code linting. Combining multiple approaches could lead to even more robust and reliable LLM-generated code.
Overall, this study presents a promising step towards improving the trustworthiness and practical application of LLM-based code generation. As these technologies continue to evolve, it will be crucial to address reliability and safety concerns to ensure their widespread adoption and effective integration into software development workflows.
Conclusion
This study proposes a self-refinement method to improve the reliability of code generated by Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. The researchers developed a system that uses targeted Verification Questions to identify potential bugs in the initial LLM-generated code, and then attempts to repair these bugs by re-prompting the LLM.
The evaluation of this approach on the CoderEval dataset demonstrates that the proposed method can significantly reduce the number of targeted errors in the code and improve the number of executable code instances, compared to state-of-the-art methods.
This research is an important contribution to the field of LLM-based code generation, as it addresses a critical challenge in the widespread adoption of these technologies: the reliability and trustworthiness of the generated code. By introducing a self-refinement process that can identify and fix potential bugs without human intervention, the researchers have taken a step towards making LLM-based coding assistants more practical and useful for software development workflows.
As LLM-based code generation continues to evolve, further research is needed to expand the range of bug patterns detected, validate the approach on a broader set of datasets and use cases, and explore integrations with other code quality assurance techniques. Addressing these areas will help unlock the full potential of these powerful AI-driven tools and enable their seamless integration into modern software development practices.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing
Xiaoyin Wang, Dakai Zhu
0
0
The latest paradigm shift in software development brings in the innovation and automation afforded by Large Language Models (LLMs), showcased by Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), which has shown remarkable capacity to generate code autonomously, significantly reducing the manual effort required for various programming tasks. Although, the potential benefits of LLM-generated code are vast, most notably in efficiency and rapid prototyping, as LLMs become increasingly integrated into the software development lifecycle and hence the supply chain, complex and multifaceted challenges arise as the code generated from these language models carry profound questions on quality and correctness. Research is required to comprehensively explore these critical concerns surrounding LLM-generated code. In this paper, we propose a novel solution called metamorphic prompt testing to address these challenges. Our intuitive observation is that intrinsic consistency always exists among correct code pieces but may not exist among flawed code pieces, so we can detect flaws in the code by detecting inconsistencies. Therefore, we can vary a given prompt to multiple prompts with paraphrasing, and to ask the LLM to acquire multiple versions of generated code, so that we can validate whether the semantic relations still hold in the acquired code through cross-validation. Our evaluation on HumanEval shows that metamorphic prompt testing is able to detect 75 percent of the erroneous programs generated by GPT-4, with a false positive rate of 8.6 percent.
6/12/2024
Code-Aware Prompting: A study of Coverage Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLM
Gabriel Ryan, Siddhartha Jain, Mingyue Shang, Shiqi Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Baishakhi Ray
0
0
Testing plays a pivotal role in ensuring software quality, yet conventional Search Based Software Testing (SBST) methods often struggle with complex software units, achieving suboptimal test coverage. Recent works using large language models (LLMs) for test generation have focused on improving generation quality through optimizing the test generation context and correcting errors in model outputs, but use fixed prompting strategies that prompt the model to generate tests without additional guidance. As a result LLM-generated testsuites still suffer from low coverage. In this paper, we present SymPrompt, a code-aware prompting strategy for LLMs in test generation. SymPrompt's approach is based on recent work that demonstrates LLMs can solve more complex logical problems when prompted to reason about the problem in a multi-step fashion. We apply this methodology to test generation by deconstructing the testsuite generation process into a multi-stage sequence, each of which is driven by a specific prompt aligned with the execution paths of the method under test, and exposing relevant type and dependency focal context to the model. Our approach enables pretrained LLMs to generate more complete test cases without any additional training. We implement SymPrompt using the TreeSitter parsing framework and evaluate on a benchmark challenging methods from open source Python projects. SymPrompt enhances correct test generations by a factor of 5 and bolsters relative coverage by 26% for CodeGen2. Notably, when applied to GPT-4, SymPrompt improves coverage by over 2x compared to baseline prompting strategies.
4/4/2024
Training LLMs to Better Self-Debug and Explain Code
Nan Jiang, Xiaopeng Li, Shiqi Wang, Qiang Zhou, Soneya Binta Hossain, Baishakhi Ray, Varun Kumar, Xiaofei Ma, Anoop Deoras
0
0
In the domain of code generation, self-debugging is crucial. It allows LLMs to refine their generated code based on execution feedback. This is particularly important because generating correct solutions in one attempt proves challenging for complex tasks. Prior works on self-debugging mostly focus on prompting methods by providing LLMs with few-shot examples, which work poorly on small open-sourced LLMs. In this work, we propose a training framework that significantly improves self-debugging capability of LLMs. Intuitively, we observe that a chain of explanations on the wrong code followed by code refinement helps LLMs better analyze the wrong code and do refinement. We thus propose an automated pipeline to collect a high-quality dataset for code explanation and refinement by generating a number of explanations and refinement trajectories and filtering via execution verification. We perform supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and further reinforcement learning (RL) on both success and failure trajectories with a novel reward design considering code explanation and refinement quality. SFT improves the pass@1 by up to 15.92% and pass@10 by 9.30% over four benchmarks. RL training brings additional up to 3.54% improvement on pass@1 and 2.55% improvement on pass@10. The trained LLMs show iterative refinement ability, and can keep refining code continuously. Lastly, our human evaluation shows that the LLMs trained with our framework generate more useful code explanations and help developers better understand bugs in source code.
5/30/2024
Towards Large Language Model Aided Program Refinement
Yufan Cai, Zhe Hou, Xiaokun Luan, David Miguel Sanan Baena, Yun Lin, Jun Sun, Jin Song Dong
0
0
Program refinement involves correctness-preserving transformations from formal high-level specification statements into executable programs. Traditional verification tool support for program refinement is highly interactive and lacks automation. On the other hand, the emergence of large language models (LLMs) enables automatic code generations from informal natural language specifications. However, code generated by LLMs is often unreliable. Moreover, the opaque procedure from specification to code provided by LLM is an uncontrolled black box. We propose LLM4PR, a tool that combines formal program refinement techniques with informal LLM-based methods to (1) transform the specification to preconditions and postconditions, (2) automatically build prompts based on refinement calculus, (3) interact with LLM to generate code, and finally, (4) verify that the generated code satisfies the conditions of refinement calculus, thus guaranteeing the correctness of the code. We have implemented our tool using GPT4, Coq, and Coqhammer, and evaluated it on the HumanEval and EvalPlus datasets.
6/28/2024