Value-Distributional Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2308.06590 - Published 9/4/2024 by Carlos E. Luis, Alessandro G. Bottero, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp, Jan Peters
Total Score

0

🏅

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Quantifying uncertainty about a policy's long-term performance is important for sequential decision-making tasks.
  • The researchers studied this problem from a model-based Bayesian reinforcement learning perspective.
  • The goal is to learn the posterior distribution over value functions, accounting for parameter (epistemic) uncertainty in the Markov decision process.
  • Previous work has restrictions on the analysis or imposes particular distribution shapes.

Plain English Explanation

When we're trying to make a series of decisions over time, it's important to understand how uncertain we are about the long-term consequences of those decisions. In this research, the authors looked at this problem from the perspective of model-based Bayesian reinforcement learning.

The key idea is that there's uncertainty in the parameters of the Markov decision process (the model of the environment). This means we don't know exactly how the environment will respond to our actions. The researchers wanted to learn the distribution of possible value functions, which represent the long-term rewards we can expect to get by following a particular policy.

Previous approaches have had some limitations, either restricting the analysis to just a few moments of the value distribution or assuming a specific shape like a Gaussian distribution. In this paper, the researchers were inspired by distributional reinforcement learning to introduce a new Bellman operator that can represent the full value distribution function.

Based on this theoretical work, the researchers propose a new algorithm called Epistemic Quantile-Regression (EQR) that learns this full value distribution. They then combine EQR with the Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) algorithm for policy optimization, allowing the use of an arbitrary differentiable objective function on the learned value distribution.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduce a new Bellman operator whose fixed-point is the value distribution function, inspired by work in distributional reinforcement learning. This allows them to represent the full distribution of possible value functions, going beyond just the mean or a few moments.

They then propose the Epistemic Quantile-Regression (EQR) algorithm, which learns this value distribution function. EQR is a model-based approach, meaning it learns a model of the environment and uses that to reason about the value distribution.

To optimize policies, the researchers combine EQR with the Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) algorithm. This allows them to optimize policies using an arbitrary differentiable objective function on the learned value distribution, rather than just the mean value.

The researchers evaluate their approach across several continuous-control tasks and find performance benefits compared to both model-based and model-free reinforcement learning algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The researchers mention a few limitations and areas for future work in the paper:

  • They note that their approach relies on accurately learning the environment model, which can be challenging in complex real-world domains.
  • The paper focuses on the single-agent setting, and the researchers suggest extending the approach to multi-agent scenarios could be an interesting direction.
  • The experiments are limited to continuous control tasks, so applying the method to other problem domains like discrete control or partially observable environments is an open question.

Additionally, while the paper introduces a principled theoretical framework for reasoning about value distribution uncertainty, the practical benefits over simpler approaches are not always clear. More extensive empirical comparisons to alternative uncertainty quantification methods could help solidify the advantages of the proposed approach.

Conclusion

This research tackles an important problem in sequential decision-making: how to quantify the uncertainty in a policy's long-term performance. By introducing a new Bellman operator and the Epistemic Quantile-Regression algorithm, the researchers develop a model-based framework for learning the full distribution of possible value functions.

Combining this with the Soft Actor-Critic algorithm for policy optimization allows the use of rich, differentiable objective functions on the learned value distribution. While the approach has some limitations that warrant further investigation, it represents an important step forward in our ability to reason about and manage uncertainty in reinforcement learning systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏅

Total Score

0

Value-Distributional Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Carlos E. Luis, Alessandro G. Bottero, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp, Jan Peters

Quantifying uncertainty about a policy's long-term performance is important to solve sequential decision-making tasks. We study the problem from a model-based Bayesian reinforcement learning perspective, where the goal is to learn the posterior distribution over value functions induced by parameter (epistemic) uncertainty of the Markov decision process. Previous work restricts the analysis to a few moments of the distribution over values or imposes a particular distribution shape, e.g., Gaussians. Inspired by distributional reinforcement learning, we introduce a Bellman operator whose fixed-point is the value distribution function. Based on our theory, we propose Epistemic Quantile-Regression (EQR), a model-based algorithm that learns a value distribution function. We combine EQR with soft actor-critic (SAC) for policy optimization with an arbitrary differentiable objective function of the learned value distribution. Evaluation across several continuous-control tasks shows performance benefits with respect to both model-based and model-free algorithms. The code is available at https://github.com/boschresearch/dist-mbrl.

Read more

9/4/2024

Echoes of Socratic Doubt: Embracing Uncertainty in Calibrated Evidential Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Echoes of Socratic Doubt: Embracing Uncertainty in Calibrated Evidential Reinforcement Learning

Alex Christopher Stutts, Danilo Erricolo, Theja Tulabandhula, Amit Ranjan Trivedi

We present a novel statistical approach to incorporating uncertainty awareness in model-free distributional reinforcement learning involving quantile regression-based deep Q networks. The proposed algorithm, $textit{Calibrated Evidential Quantile Regression in Deep Q Networks (CEQR-DQN)}$, aims to address key challenges associated with separately estimating aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in stochastic environments. It combines deep evidential learning with quantile calibration based on principles of conformal inference to provide explicit, sample-free computations of $textit{global}$ uncertainty as opposed to $textit{local}$ estimates based on simple variance, overcoming limitations of traditional methods in computational and statistical efficiency and handling of out-of-distribution (OOD) observations. Tested on a suite of miniaturized Atari games (i.e., MinAtar), CEQR-DQN is shown to surpass similar existing frameworks in scores and learning speed. Its ability to rigorously evaluate uncertainty improves exploration strategies and can serve as a blueprint for other algorithms requiring uncertainty awareness.

Read more

6/5/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Dual Expectile-Quantile Regression

Sami Jullien, Romain Deffayet, Jean-Michel Renders, Paul Groth, Maarten de Rijke

Distributional reinforcement learning (RL) has proven useful in multiple benchmarks as it enables approximating the full distribution of returns and makes a better use of environment samples. The commonly used quantile regression approach to distributional RL -- based on asymmetric $L_1$ losses -- provides a flexible and effective way of learning arbitrary return distributions. In practice, it is often improved by using a more efficient, hybrid asymmetric $L_1$-$L_2$ Huber loss for quantile regression. However, by doing so, distributional estimation guarantees vanish, and we empirically observe that the estimated distribution rapidly collapses to its mean. Indeed, asymmetric $L_2$ losses, corresponding to expectile regression, cannot be readily used for distributional temporal difference learning. Motivated by the efficiency of $L_2$-based learning, we propose to jointly learn expectiles and quantiles of the return distribution in a way that allows efficient learning while keeping an estimate of the full distribution of returns. We prove that our approach approximately learns the correct return distribution, and we benchmark a practical implementation on a toy example and at scale. On the Atari benchmark, our approach matches the performance of the Huber-based IQN-1 baseline after $200$M training frames but avoids distributional collapse and keeps estimates of the full distribution of returns.

Read more

8/15/2024

Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Ondrej Bajgar, Alessandro Abate, Konstantinos Gatsis, Michael A. Osborne

The goal of Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is recovering a posterior distribution over reward functions using a set of demonstrations from an expert optimizing for a reward unknown to the learner. The resulting posterior over rewards can then be used to synthesize an apprentice policy that performs well on the same or a similar task. A key challenge in Bayesian IRL is bridging the computational gap between the hypothesis space of possible rewards and the likelihood, often defined in terms of Q values: vanilla Bayesian IRL needs to solve the costly forward planning problem - going from rewards to the Q values - at every step of the algorithm, which may need to be done thousands of times. We propose to solve this by a simple change: instead of focusing on primarily sampling in the space of rewards, we can focus on primarily working in the space of Q-values, since the computation required to go from Q-values to reward is radically cheaper. Furthermore, this reversion of the computation makes it easy to compute the gradient allowing efficient sampling using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We propose ValueWalk - a new Markov chain Monte Carlo method based on this insight - and illustrate its advantages on several tasks.

Read more

7/16/2024