Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2407.10971 - Published 7/16/2024 by Ondrej Bajgar, Alessandro Abate, Konstantinos Gatsis, Michael A. Osborne
Total Score

0

Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning (BIRL) algorithm for learning reward functions from expert demonstrations, even in non-Markovian settings.
  • The algorithm is designed to handle complex, non-Markovian reward structures that cannot be captured by traditional Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) approaches.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on several benchmark tasks, showing that it outperforms existing IRL techniques in terms of reward recovery and policy learning.

Plain English Explanation

In Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning, the goal is to figure out the reward function that an expert is trying to maximize, based on observing their behavior. This is useful for things like training an AI system to behave similarly to a human expert.

Traditional IRL methods assume the reward function depends only on the current state, which may not always be true. This paper introduces a new Bayesian approach that can handle more complex reward structures, where the reward might depend on the entire history of states and actions, not just the current one.

The key idea is to model the reward function as a function of the "value" of each state-action pair, which captures the long-term expected reward. By exploring the space of possible value functions, the algorithm can infer the underlying reward function that best explains the expert's behavior, even in non-Markovian settings.

The authors test their method on several benchmark tasks and show that it outperforms existing IRL techniques. This suggests the new Bayesian approach is a promising way to learn reward functions from expert demonstrations, with applications in areas like robotics, game AI, and decision-making systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a Bayesian approach to Inverse Reinforcement Learning that can handle non-Markovian reward structures. The key insight is to model the reward function as a function of the "value" of each state-action pair, rather than just the current state.

The authors formulate the IRL problem as a Bayesian inference task, where the goal is to recover the posterior distribution over possible reward functions given the expert's demonstrations. They develop a convergent model-free algorithm to efficiently explore the space of value functions and infer the underlying reward.

Crucially, the method does not require the Markov property to hold, allowing it to capture more complex, history-dependent reward structures. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark tasks, including multi-intention inverse Q-learning and stable inverse reinforcement learning, where it outperforms existing IRL techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling Bayesian approach to IRL that can handle non-Markovian reward structures. The authors demonstrate strong empirical performance and provide a solid theoretical foundation for their method.

One potential limitation is the computational complexity of the algorithm, as exploring the space of value functions can be challenging, especially for large state-action spaces. The authors address this to some extent by developing a model-free approach, but further optimizations may be necessary for scaling to real-world problems.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the interpretability or robustness of the learned reward functions. It would be interesting to see how the inferred rewards compare to human intuitions and how sensitive the method is to noisy or adversarial demonstrations.

Overall, this paper represents a significant advance in the field of Inverse Reinforcement Learning, with promising applications in areas like robotics, game AI, and decision-making systems. The Bayesian approach offers a powerful framework for learning rich, history-dependent reward structures from expert behavior.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning algorithm that can effectively learn reward functions from expert demonstrations, even in non-Markovian settings. By modeling the reward as a function of state-action values, the method can capture complex, history-dependent reward structures that traditional IRL approaches struggle with.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark tasks, showing that it outperforms existing IRL techniques. This suggests the new Bayesian BIRL algorithm is a promising tool for learning reward functions from expert behavior, with applications in a wide range of domains where understanding and imitating human decision-making is crucial.

As AI systems become more sophisticated and are tasked with navigating increasingly complex environments, the ability to learn rich, history-dependent reward functions will be essential. This paper represents an important step forward in this direction, paving the way for more powerful and versatile reinforcement learning systems that can better emulate and collaborate with human experts.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Walking the Values in Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Ondrej Bajgar, Alessandro Abate, Konstantinos Gatsis, Michael A. Osborne

The goal of Bayesian inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is recovering a posterior distribution over reward functions using a set of demonstrations from an expert optimizing for a reward unknown to the learner. The resulting posterior over rewards can then be used to synthesize an apprentice policy that performs well on the same or a similar task. A key challenge in Bayesian IRL is bridging the computational gap between the hypothesis space of possible rewards and the likelihood, often defined in terms of Q values: vanilla Bayesian IRL needs to solve the costly forward planning problem - going from rewards to the Q values - at every step of the algorithm, which may need to be done thousands of times. We propose to solve this by a simple change: instead of focusing on primarily sampling in the space of rewards, we can focus on primarily working in the space of Q-values, since the computation required to go from Q-values to reward is radically cheaper. Furthermore, this reversion of the computation makes it easy to compute the gradient allowing efficient sampling using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. We propose ValueWalk - a new Markov chain Monte Carlo method based on this insight - and illustrate its advantages on several tasks.

Read more

7/16/2024

Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards
Total Score

0

Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards

Noah Topper, Alvaro Velasquez, George Atia

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring a reward function from expert behavior. There are several approaches to IRL, but most are designed to learn a Markovian reward. However, a reward function might be non-Markovian, depending on more than just the current state, such as a reward machine (RM). Although there has been recent work on inferring RMs, it assumes access to the reward signal, absent in IRL. We propose a Bayesian IRL (BIRL) framework for inferring RMs directly from expert behavior, requiring significant changes to the standard framework. We define a new reward space, adapt the expert demonstration to include history, show how to compute the reward posterior, and propose a novel modification to simulated annealing to maximize this posterior. We demonstrate that our method performs well when optimizing according to its inferred reward and compares favorably to an existing method that learns exclusively binary non-Markovian rewards.

Read more

6/21/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

A Bayesian Approach to Robust Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Ran Wei, Siliang Zeng, Chenliang Li, Alfredo Garcia, Anthony McDonald, Mingyi Hong

We consider a Bayesian approach to offline model-based inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). The proposed framework differs from existing offline model-based IRL approaches by performing simultaneous estimation of the expert's reward function and subjective model of environment dynamics. We make use of a class of prior distributions which parameterizes how accurate the expert's model of the environment is to develop efficient algorithms to estimate the expert's reward and subjective dynamics in high-dimensional settings. Our analysis reveals a novel insight that the estimated policy exhibits robust performance when the expert is believed (a priori) to have a highly accurate model of the environment. We verify this observation in the MuJoCo environments and show that our algorithms outperform state-of-the-art offline IRL algorithms.

Read more

4/9/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm

Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour

Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.

Read more

4/24/2024