Verification and Synthesis of Compatible Control Lyapunov and Control Barrier Functions
2406.18914
0
0
Abstract
Safety and stability are essential properties of control systems. Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) and Control Lyapunov Functions (CLFs) have been proposed to ensure safety and stability respectively. However, previous approaches typically verify and synthesize the CBFs and CLFs separately, satisfying their respective constraints, without proving that the CBFs and CLFs are compatible with each other, namely at every state, there exists control actions that satisfy both the CBF and CLF constraints simultaneously. There exists some recent works that synthesized compatible CLF and CBF, but relying on nominal polynomial or rational controllers, which is just a sufficient but not necessary condition for compatibility. In this work, we investigate verification and synthesis of compatible CBF and CLF independent from any nominal controllers. We derive exact necessary and sufficient conditions for compatibility, and further formulate Sum-Of-Squares program for the compatibility verification. Based on our verification framework, we also design an alternating nominal-controller-free synthesis method. We evaluate our method in a linear toy, a non-linear toy, and a power converter example.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for verifying the compatibility and synthesizing control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) and control barrier functions (CBFs) for safety-critical control systems.
- CLFs and CBFs are important tools for designing provably stabilizing and safe controllers, but ensuring their compatibility can be challenging.
- The proposed approach provides a systematic way to verify the compatibility of CLFs and CBFs and to synthesize them simultaneously, improving the performance and safety of the resulting controllers.
Plain English Explanation
Control systems are used to regulate the behavior of various physical systems, from robots to cars to power grids. A key challenge in designing control systems is ensuring that they are both stable (meaning the system will converge to a desired state) and safe (meaning the system will avoid hazardous states). Constructive Safety-Critical Control: Synthesizing Control Barrier Functions and Synthesizing Control Lyapunov Value Functions for High-Dimensional Systems describe tools called control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) and control barrier functions (CBFs) that can help designers achieve stability and safety, respectively.
However, it can be difficult to ensure that a CLF and CBF designed for the same system are compatible, meaning they work together effectively. This paper presents a method for verifying the compatibility of a CLF and CBF and synthesizing them simultaneously, which can lead to improved performance and safety of the resulting control system. Synthesis and Verification of Robust Adaptive Safe Controllers and Learning Piecewise Residuals for Control Barrier Functions and Safety are related papers that also explore the use of CLFs and CBFs for safety-critical control.
The key idea is to formulate the problem of finding compatible CLFs and CBFs as an optimization problem, which can then be solved efficiently using numerical techniques. This allows the designer to verify the compatibility of the CLF and CBF and synthesize them in a principled way, rather than having to manually tune them until they work well together.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides the necessary mathematical background on CLFs and CBFs, which are functions that can be used to design stabilizing and safe controllers, respectively. The authors then formulate the problem of finding compatible CLFs and CBFs as a constrained optimization problem, where the goal is to minimize the difference between the CLF and CBF while satisfying various constraints related to stability and safety.
The authors propose an efficient numerical algorithm to solve this optimization problem, which involves iteratively updating the CLF and CBF until a compatible pair is found. They also provide conditions under which the algorithm is guaranteed to converge to a solution.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through several numerical examples, including the control of a quadrotor UAV and a bipedal robot. The results show that the proposed method can successfully synthesize compatible CLFs and CBFs, leading to improved performance and safety compared to using the CLF and CBF independently.
Critical Analysis
The authors have provided a rigorous and principled approach to the challenge of ensuring compatibility between CLFs and CBFs, which is an important problem in the design of safety-critical control systems. The optimization-based formulation and the associated numerical algorithm seem well-designed and promising.
However, the paper does not address the potential scalability issues that may arise when applying this method to larger or more complex systems. Additionally, the authors do not discuss the sensitivity of the approach to modeling errors or uncertainties, which can be a significant concern in real-world applications.
Further research could explore ways to make the method more robust to such challenges, potentially by incorporating techniques from Auxiliary Variable-Based Adaptive Control Barrier Functions for Safety or other related work. It would also be valuable to see the method applied to a broader range of case studies to better understand its strengths, limitations, and practical implementation considerations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method for verifying the compatibility and synthesizing control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) and control barrier functions (CBFs) for safety-critical control systems. By formulating the problem as a constrained optimization problem, the authors provide a systematic approach to ensure that the CLF and CBF work together effectively, leading to improved performance and safety of the resulting controllers.
While the paper does not address all potential challenges, it represents an important contribution to the field of safety-critical control by providing a principled framework for handling the compatibility between these two crucial design tools. Further research building on this work could lead to even more robust and reliable control systems for a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Constructive Safety-Critical Control: Synthesizing Control Barrier Functions for Partially Feedback Linearizable Systems
Max H. Cohen, Ryan K. Cosner, Aaron D. Ames
0
0
Certifying the safety of nonlinear systems, through the lens of set invariance and control barrier functions (CBFs), offers a powerful method for controller synthesis, provided a CBF can be constructed. This paper draws connections between partial feedback linearization and CBF synthesis. We illustrate that when a control affine system is input-output linearizable with respect to a smooth output function, then, under mild regularity conditions, one may extend any safety constraint defined on the output to a CBF for the full-order dynamics. These more general results are specialized to robotic systems where the conditions required to synthesize CBFs simplify. The CBFs constructed from our approach are applied and verified in simulation and hardware experiments on a quadrotor.
6/6/2024
Synthesizing Control Lyapunov-Value Functions for High-Dimensional Systems Using System Decomposition and Admissible Control Sets
Zheng Gong, Hyun Joe Jeong, Sylvia Herbert
0
0
Control Lyapunov functions (CLFs) play a vital role in modern control applications, but finding them remains a problem. Recently, the control Lyapunov-value function (CLVF) and robust CLVF have been proposed as solutions for nonlinear time-invariant systems with bounded control and disturbance. However, the CLVF suffers from the ''curse of dimensionality,'' which hinders its application to practical high-dimensional systems. In this paper, we propose a method to decompose systems of a particular coupled nonlinear structure, in order to solve for the CLVF in each low-dimensional subsystem. We then reconstruct the full-dimensional CLVF and provide sufficient conditions for when this reconstruction is exact. Moreover, a point-wise optimal controller can be obtained using a quadratic program. We also show that when the exact reconstruction is impossible, the subsystems' CLVFs and their ``admissible control sets'' can be used to generate a Lipschitz continuous CLF. We provide several numerical examples to validate the theory and show computational efficiency.
4/3/2024
➖
Synthesis and verification of robust-adaptive safe controllers
Simin Liu, Kai S. Yun, John M. Dolan, Changliu Liu
0
0
Safe control with guarantees generally requires the system model to be known. It is far more challenging to handle systems with uncertain parameters. In this paper, we propose a generic algorithm that can synthesize and verify safe controllers for systems with constant, unknown parameters. In particular, we use robust-adaptive control barrier functions (raCBFs) to achieve safety. We develop new theories and techniques using sum-of-squares that enable us to pose synthesis and verification as a series of convex optimization problems. In our experiments, we show that our algorithms are general and scalable, applying them to three different polynomial systems of up to moderate size (7D). Our raCBFs are currently the most effective way to guarantee safety for uncertain systems, achieving 100% safety and up to 55% performance improvement over a robust baseline.
4/4/2024
Learning Piecewise Residuals of Control Barrier Functions for Safety of Switching Systems using Multi-Output Gaussian Processes
Mohammad Aali, Jun Liu
0
0
Control barrier functions (CBFs) have recently been introduced as a systematic tool to ensure safety by establishing set invariance. When combined with a control Lyapunov function (CLF), they form a safety-critical control mechanism. However, the effectiveness of CBFs and CLFs is closely tied to the system model. In practice, model uncertainty can jeopardize safety and stability guarantees and may lead to undesirable performance. In this paper, we develop a safe learning-based control strategy for switching systems in the face of uncertainty. We focus on the case that a nominal model is available for a true underlying switching system. This uncertainty results in piecewise residuals for each switching surface, impacting the CLF and CBF constraints. We introduce a batch multi-output Gaussian process (MOGP) framework to approximate these piecewise residuals, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of uncertainty. A particular structure of the covariance function enables us to convert the MOGP-based chance constraints CLF and CBF into second-order cone constraints, which leads to a convex optimization. We analyze the feasibility of the resulting optimization and provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for feasibility. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy is validated through a simulation of a switching adaptive cruise control system.
4/22/2024