Visions of augmented reality in popular culture: Power and (un)readable identities when the world becomes a screen

Overview

• This paper examines how the concept of augmented reality (AR) is represented in popular culture and how those representations reflect issues of power, gender, and race.
• The author analyzes three science fiction visions of AR through the lens of feminist theory, looking at factors like performativity and intelligibility, visibility and race, gendered gaze, and algorithmic normativity.
• The paper argues that AR technologies can reinforce existing social hierarchies and power structures, and that a critical understanding of these issues is necessary as AR becomes more prevalent.

Plain English Explanation

Augmented reality (AR) is a technology where digital objects are overlaid and combined with the real world. This paper looks at how AR is portrayed in science fiction stories and how those portrayals reflect important social issues.

The author examines three different visions of the future with AR through the lens of feminist theory. This means they analyze how factors like gender, race, and power dynamics are represented in these AR futures.

For example, the paper looks at how AR could make certain bodies or identities more visible or "intelligible" than others. It also explores how the way people look at and interact with AR content could reinforce gendered power structures.

Overall, the key idea is that AR technology doesn't exist in a vacuum. As it becomes more advanced and widespread, it will inevitably interact with and potentially amplify existing social norms and inequalities. The paper argues that we need to think critically about these issues to ensure AR develops in a more equitable and inclusive way.

Technical Explanation

The paper takes a critical, feminist approach to analyzing representations of augmented reality (AR) in science fiction. The author draws on feminist theory around performativity and intelligibility, visibility and race, gendered gaze, and algorithmic normativity to examine how power, identity, and social dynamics are coded into three speculative visions of AR futures.

The analysis focuses on how these AR futures inscribe certain bodies, identities, and social relationships as more "intelligible" or visible than others. The paper argues that AR does not exist in a neutral or apolitical space, but rather becomes entangled with existing discourses, technologies, and power structures in ways that can reinforce hierarchies and normative social scripts.

Ultimately, the paper makes the case that a critical understanding of these dynamics is crucial as AR technologies become increasingly ubiquitous and integrated into everyday life. It suggests that AR may not simply be a neutral enhancement of our sensory experience, but a technology that shapes and is shaped by complex social, political, and cultural forces.

Critical Analysis

The paper offers a valuable critical perspective on emerging AR technologies, highlighting important issues around power, identity, and social dynamics that are often overlooked in more techno-utopian visions of the future.

By grounding the analysis in feminist theory, the author provides a nuanced and intersectional lens for examining how AR could amplify or reshape existing inequities related to gender, race, and algorithmic bias. This is an important contribution, as much of the current discourse around AR tends to focus on its technical capabilities rather than its potential social and ethical implications.

That said, the paper could be strengthened by engaging more directly with existing research and debates within the field of AR, rather than primarily drawing from science fiction examples. Additionally, while the theoretical framework is well-developed, the analysis of the specific AR visions could be enriched with more detailed examples and evidence.

Overall, this paper serves as a crucial reminder that the development of transformative technologies like AR must be accompanied by rigorous critical analysis and a commitment to equitable and inclusive design. As the author argues, failing to do so risks entrenching existing power structures and further marginalizing already vulnerable populations.

Conclusion

This paper provides a critical examination of how augmented reality (AR) is represented in popular culture, and how those representations reflect important issues of power, identity, and social dynamics.

By analyzing three science fiction visions of AR through the lens of feminist theory, the author demonstrates how this emerging technology does not exist in a vacuum, but rather becomes entangled with existing discourses, power structures, and normative social scripts.

The paper argues that as AR becomes more prevalent, it has the potential to reinforce or even exacerbate certain inequities and hierarchies related to gender, race, and algorithmic bias. Consequently, the author emphasizes the need for a more nuanced, critical understanding of AR's social and ethical implications as the technology continues to develop and be integrated into everyday life.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of work exploring the socio-political dimensions of emerging technologies, and serves as a important call to action for the AR research and development community to prioritize inclusive and equitable design.