WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- WatChat is a system that helps explain perplexing programs by debugging users' mental models.
- It uses natural language interaction to understand the user's understanding of a program and provide explanations to resolve misunderstandings.
- The paper describes the design and evaluation of WatChat, demonstrating its ability to improve users' comprehension of complex programs.
Plain English Explanation
WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental models is a system that aims to help people understand confusing computer programs. It works by having a conversation with the user to figure out what they think the program is doing, and then providing explanations to fix any misunderstandings.
The key idea is that people often have mental models - their own internal representations of how a program works - that don't fully match the actual program. WatChat tries to identify these mismatches and then provide tailored explanations to correct the user's understanding.
For example, if a user thinks a program is doing something it's not, WatChat can have a dialog to uncover that misconception and then explain the program's true behavior. By debugging the user's mental model, WatChat can help them make sense of perplexing programs.
The paper describes how the WatChat system was designed and evaluated. The researchers found that it was effective at improving users' comprehension of complex programs, compared to just showing the program code alone. This suggests WatChat could be a valuable tool for anyone trying to understand tricky software.
Technical Explanation
The WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental models paper presents a novel system that uses natural language interaction to help users understand complex computer programs.
The key insight is that people often have mental models - their own internal representations of how a program works - that may not align with the actual program logic. WatChat aims to identify and correct these mismatches between the user's mental model and the true program behavior.
The WatChat system works by having a conversational dialog with the user about the program. It asks clarifying questions to uncover the user's understanding, and then provides targeted explanations to resolve any misconceptions. This interactive debugging of the user's mental model is the core of the WatChat approach.
To evaluate WatChat, the researchers conducted a user study where participants were asked to understand programs with varying levels of complexity. One group used WatChat, while a control group only saw the program code. The results showed that the WatChat group had significantly better comprehension of the programs compared to the control group.
The WatChat system is built on large language models and other AI components. It uses techniques like program parsing, code summarization, and natural language generation to engage in the explanatory dialog with users. The paper provides details on the WatChat architecture and core algorithms.
Overall, the WatChat research demonstrates the value of interactive mental model debugging for improving program understanding. By focusing on the user's conceptual grasp rather than just the code, WatChat offers a promising approach for making complex software more accessible.
Critical Analysis
The WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental models paper presents an innovative system for enhancing users' understanding of complex programs. The key strength is the focus on interactively debugging the user's mental model, rather than just presenting the program code.
One limitation noted in the paper is that WatChat currently only works for relatively small programs. Scaling the system to handle more substantial codebases may require additional research and engineering. The authors also acknowledge that the system's ability to accurately diagnose and correct mental model errors is still an open challenge.
Additionally, the user study evaluated WatChat in a somewhat controlled setting. Further research would be needed to assess its real-world performance and generalizability across diverse users and programming domains.
Another potential concern is the reliance on large language models, which are known to have biases and limitations. Ensuring the explanations provided by WatChat are accurate, unbiased, and helpful for users will be an important area for continued development.
Despite these caveats, the WatChat research represents an interesting and valuable contribution to the field of program comprehension. By focusing on the human cognitive aspects rather than just the code, it offers a promising direction for making complex software more accessible and understandable.
Conclusion
The WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental models paper introduces a novel system that uses natural language interaction to help users understand complex computer programs. The key innovation is the focus on interactively debugging the user's mental model of how the program works, rather than just presenting the program code.
Through a user study, the researchers demonstrated that WatChat can significantly improve users' comprehension of perplexing programs compared to a control group. This suggests WatChat could be a valuable tool for anyone struggling to make sense of complex software, from students learning to code to professionals maintaining legacy systems.
While the current WatChat system has some limitations, the research represents an important step forward in the field of program understanding. By incorporating human cognitive factors like mental models, WatChat offers a promising direction for making advanced software more accessible and usable for a wide range of users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!WatChat: Explaining perplexing programs by debugging mental models
Kartik Chandra, Katherine M. Collins, Will Crichton, Tony Chen, Tzu-Mao Li, Adrian Weller, Rachit Nigam, Joshua Tenenbaum, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley
Often, a good explanation for a program's unexpected behavior is a bug in the programmer's code. But sometimes, an even better explanation is a bug in the programmer's mental model of the language or API they are using. Instead of merely debugging our current code (giving the programmer a fish), what if our tools could directly debug our mental models (teaching the programmer to fish)? In this paper, we apply recent ideas from computational cognitive science to offer a principled framework for doing exactly that. Given a why? question about a program, we automatically infer potential misconceptions about the language/API that might cause the user to be surprised by the program's behavior -- and then analyze those misconceptions to provide explanations of the program's behavior. Our key idea is to formally represent misconceptions as counterfactual (erroneous) semantics for the language/API, which can be inferred and debugged using program synthesis techniques. We demonstrate our framework, WatChat, by building systems for explanation in two domains: JavaScript type coercion, and the Git version control system. We evaluate WatChatJS and WatChatGit by comparing their outputs to experimentally-collected human-written explanations in these two domains: we show that WatChat's explanations exhibit key features of human-written explanation, unlike those of a state-of-the-art language model.
Read more10/3/2024
0
Let's Ask AI About Their Programs: Exploring ChatGPT's Answers To Program Comprehension Questions
Teemu Lehtinen, Charles Koutcheme, Arto Hellas
Recent research has explored the creation of questions from code submitted by students. These Questions about Learners' Code (QLCs) are created through program analysis, exploring execution paths, and then creating code comprehension questions from these paths and the broader code structure. Responding to the questions requires reading and tracing the code, which is known to support students' learning. At the same time, computing education researchers have witnessed the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) that have taken the community by storm. Researchers have demonstrated the applicability of these models especially in the introductory programming context, outlining their performance in solving introductory programming problems and their utility in creating new learning resources. In this work, we explore the capability of the state-of-the-art LLMs (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) in answering QLCs that are generated from code that the LLMs have created. Our results show that although the state-of-the-art LLMs can create programs and trace program execution when prompted, they easily succumb to similar errors that have previously been recorded for novice programmers. These results demonstrate the fallibility of these models and perhaps dampen the expectations fueled by the recent LLM hype. At the same time, we also highlight future research possibilities such as using LLMs to mimic students as their behavior can indeed be similar for some specific tasks.
Read more4/19/2024
š
0
Analyzing Chat Protocols of Novice Programmers Solving Introductory Programming Tasks with ChatGPT
Andreas Scholl, Daniel Schiffner, Natalie Kiesler
Large Language Models (LLMs) have taken the world by storm, and students are assumed to use related tools at a great scale. In this research paper we aim to gain an understanding of how introductory programming students chat with LLMs and related tools, e.g., ChatGPT-3.5. To address this goal, computing students at a large German university were motivated to solve programming exercises with the assistance of ChatGPT as part of their weekly introductory course exercises. Then students (n=213) submitted their chat protocols (with 2335 prompts in sum) as data basis for this analysis. The data was analyzed w.r.t. the prompts, frequencies, the chats' progress, contents, and other use pattern, which revealed a great variety of interactions, both potentially supportive and concerning. Learning about students' interactions with ChatGPT will help inform and align teaching practices and instructions for future introductory programming courses in higher education.
Read more5/30/2024
0
ChatDBG: An AI-Powered Debugging Assistant
Kyla Levin, Nicolas van Kempen, Emery D. Berger, Stephen N. Freund
Debugging is a critical but challenging task for programmers. This paper proposes ChatDBG, an AI-powered debugging assistant. ChatDBG integrates large language models (LLMs) to significantly enhance the capabilities and user-friendliness of conventional debuggers. ChatDBG lets programmers engage in a collaborative dialogue with the debugger, allowing them to pose complex questions about program state, perform root cause analysis for crashes or assertion failures, and explore open-ended queries like `why is x null?'. To handle these queries, ChatDBG grants the LLM autonomy to take the wheel: it can act as an independent agent capable of querying and controlling the debugger to navigate through stacks and inspect program state. It then reports its findings and yields back control to the programmer. Our ChatDBG prototype integrates with standard debuggers including LLDB and GDB for native code and Pdb for Python. Our evaluation across a diverse set of code, including C/C++ code with known bugs and a suite of Python code including standalone scripts and Jupyter notebooks, demonstrates that ChatDBG can successfully analyze root causes, explain bugs, and generate accurate fixes for a wide range of real-world errors. For the Python programs, a single query led to an actionable bug fix 67% of the time; one additional follow-up query increased the success rate to 85%. ChatDBG has seen rapid uptake; it has already been downloaded roughly 50,000 times.
Read more9/25/2024