Weak neural variational inference for solving Bayesian inverse problems without forward models: applications in elastography
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new technique called "weak neural variational inference" for solving Bayesian inverse problems without requiring forward models.
- It applies this method to the problem of elastography, where the goal is to estimate the internal stiffness properties of soft tissues from external deformation measurements.
- The key idea is to train a neural network to directly map the observed deformation data to the underlying tissue properties, bypassing the need for an explicit forward model.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles a challenging problem in medical imaging called elastography. In elastography, the goal is to estimate the internal stiffness or "springiness" of soft tissues, like the liver or brain, by measuring how they deform when an external force is applied.
Traditionally, this has required building a complex mathematical model, called a "forward model," that describes how the tissue deforms in response to the applied force. The researchers then have to solve an "inverse problem" to infer the tissue properties from the observed deformation. This is a difficult and computationally expensive process.
Instead, the authors propose a new technique called "weak neural variational inference" that sidesteps the need for a forward model altogether. They train a neural network to directly map the observed deformation data to the underlying tissue properties. This allows them to solve the inverse problem much more efficiently, without sacrificing accuracy.
The key insight is that the neural network can learn the relevant relationships between the deformation data and the tissue properties, even without an explicit mathematical model. This "weak" approach, where the network learns from data rather than relying on a predefined model, is what makes it so powerful and flexible.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework called "weak neural variational inference" (WNVI) for solving Bayesian inverse problems without requiring a forward model. The authors apply this method to the problem of elastography, where the goal is to estimate the internal stiffness properties of soft tissues from external deformation measurements.
The core idea of WNVI is to train a neural network to directly map the observed deformation data to the underlying tissue properties, bypassing the need for an explicit forward model. This is achieved by framing the inverse problem as a Bayesian inference task and using variational inference techniques to train the neural network.
Specifically, the authors propose a neural network architecture that consists of an encoder network and a decoder network. The encoder network takes the deformation data as input and outputs a low-dimensional latent representation. The decoder network then maps this latent representation to the tissue properties of interest.
The network is trained by minimizing a loss function that encourages the network to learn a posterior distribution over the tissue properties that is consistent with the observed deformation data. This is done without requiring a forward model, making the approach more flexible and efficient than traditional inverse problem solvers.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of WNVI on several synthetic and real-world elastography datasets, showing that it can accurately estimate tissue properties while being significantly faster than model-based approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new approach for solving Bayesian inverse problems without the need for an explicit forward model. By leveraging the representational power of neural networks, the WNVI method can bypass the computationally expensive process of building and inverting a forward model, which is a significant bottleneck in many inverse problem applications.
One potential limitation of the WNVI approach is that it relies on the ability of the neural network to learn the relevant relationships between the observed data and the underlying parameters of interest. This may be challenging in cases where the mapping is highly complex or the training data is limited. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that incorporating physics-informed constraints or other forms of prior knowledge could help address this issue.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the robustness of the WNVI method to factors such as noise, model misspecification, or out-of-distribution samples. Investigating the performance of WNVI under realistic conditions and comparing it to other state-of-the-art inverse problem solvers would be valuable for assessing the practical applicability of the approach.
Overall, the WNVI framework represents an interesting and potentially impactful contribution to the field of Bayesian inverse problems. The authors have demonstrated its effectiveness in the context of elastography, but the broader applicability of the method to other inverse problem domains remains an area for further exploration and research.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel technique called "weak neural variational inference" (WNVI) for solving Bayesian inverse problems without the need for an explicit forward model. By training a neural network to directly map observed data to the underlying parameters of interest, WNVI can bypass the computationally expensive process of building and inverting a forward model, which is a common bottleneck in many inverse problem applications.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of WNVI on the problem of elastography, where the goal is to estimate the internal stiffness properties of soft tissues from external deformation measurements. The results suggest that WNVI can accurately estimate tissue properties while being significantly faster than traditional model-based approaches.
While the WNVI framework shows promise, further research is needed to address potential limitations, such as the network's ability to learn complex mappings and the method's robustness to realistic conditions. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step towards more efficient and flexible solutions for a wide range of Bayesian inverse problems, with far-reaching implications in fields like medical imaging, geophysics, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Weak neural variational inference for solving Bayesian inverse problems without forward models: applications in elastography
Vincent C. Scholz, Yaohua Zang, Phaedon-Stelios Koutsourelakis
In this paper, we introduce a novel, data-driven approach for solving high-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems based on partial differential equations (PDEs), called Weak Neural Variational Inference (WNVI). The method complements real measurements with virtual observations derived from the physical model. In particular, weighted residuals are employed as probes to the governing PDE in order to formulate and solve a Bayesian inverse problem without ever formulating nor solving a forward model. The formulation treats the state variables of the physical model as latent variables, inferred using Stochastic Variational Inference (SVI), along with the usual unknowns. The approximate posterior employed uses neural networks to approximate the inverse mapping from state variables to the unknowns. We illustrate the proposed method in a biomedical setting where we infer spatially varying material properties from noisy tissue deformation data. We demonstrate that WNVI is not only as accurate and more efficient than traditional methods that rely on repeatedly solving the (non)linear forward problem as a black-box, but it can also handle ill-posed forward problems (e.g., with insufficient boundary conditions).
Read more7/31/2024
0
Stochastic full waveform inversion with deep generative prior for uncertainty quantification
Yuke Xie, Herv'e Chauris, Nicolas Desassis
To obtain high-resolution images of subsurface structures from seismic data, seismic imaging techniques such as Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) serve as crucial tools. However, FWI involves solving a nonlinear and often non-unique inverse problem, presenting challenges such as local minima trapping and inadequate handling of inherent uncertainties. In addressing these challenges, we propose leveraging deep generative models as the prior distribution of geophysical parameters for stochastic Bayesian inversion. This approach integrates the adjoint state gradient for efficient back-propagation from the numerical solution of partial differential equations. Additionally, we introduce explicit and implicit variational Bayesian inference methods. The explicit method computes variational distribution density using a normalizing flow-based neural network, enabling computation of the Bayesian posterior of parameters. Conversely, the implicit method employs an inference network attached to a pretrained generative model to estimate density, incorporating an entropy estimator. Furthermore, we also experimented with the Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD) method as another variational inference technique, using particles. We compare these variational Bayesian inference methods with conventional Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) sampling. Each method is able to quantify uncertainties and to generate seismic data-conditioned realizations of subsurface geophysical parameters. This framework provides insights into subsurface structures while accounting for inherent uncertainties.
Read more6/10/2024
🤯
0
Learning to solve Bayesian inverse problems: An amortized variational inference approach using Gaussian and Flow guides
Sharmila Karumuri, Ilias Bilionis
Inverse problems, i.e., estimating parameters of physical models from experimental data, are ubiquitous in science and engineering. The Bayesian formulation is the gold standard because it alleviates ill-posedness issues and quantifies epistemic uncertainty. Since analytical posteriors are not typically available, one resorts to Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling or approximate variational inference. However, inference needs to be rerun from scratch for each new set of data. This drawback limits the applicability of the Bayesian formulation to real-time settings, e.g., health monitoring of engineered systems, and medical diagnosis. The objective of this paper is to develop a methodology that enables real-time inference by learning the Bayesian inverse map, i.e., the map from data to posteriors. Our approach is as follows. We parameterize the posterior distribution as a function of data. This work outlines two distinct approaches to do this. The first method involves parameterizing the posterior using an amortized full-rank Gaussian guide, implemented through neural networks. The second method utilizes a Conditional Normalizing Flow guide, employing conditional invertible neural networks for cases where the target posterior is arbitrarily complex. In both approaches, we learn the network parameters by amortized variational inference which involves maximizing the expectation of evidence lower bound over all possible datasets compatible with the model. We demonstrate our approach by solving a set of benchmark problems from science and engineering. Our results show that the posterior estimates of our approach are in agreement with the corresponding ground truth obtained by Markov chain Monte Carlo. Once trained, our approach provides the posterior distribution for a given observation just at the cost of a forward pass of the neural network.
Read more5/28/2024
🤯
0
A Primer on Variational Inference for Physics-Informed Deep Generative Modelling
Alex Glyn-Davies, Arnaud Vadeboncoeur, O. Deniz Akyildiz, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Mark Girolami
Variational inference (VI) is a computationally efficient and scalable methodology for approximate Bayesian inference. It strikes a balance between accuracy of uncertainty quantification and practical tractability. It excels at generative modelling and inversion tasks due to its built-in Bayesian regularisation and flexibility, essential qualities for physics related problems. Deriving the central learning objective for VI must often be tailored to new learning tasks where the nature of the problems dictates the conditional dependence between variables of interest, such as arising in physics problems. In this paper, we provide an accessible and thorough technical introduction to VI for forward and inverse problems, guiding the reader through standard derivations of the VI framework and how it can best be realized through deep learning. We then review and unify recent literature exemplifying the creative flexibility allowed by VI. This paper is designed for a general scientific audience looking to solve physics-based problems with an emphasis on uncertainty quantification.
Read more9/11/2024