What Have We Achieved on Non-autoregressive Translation?
0
🌀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recent advances have made non-autoregressive (NAT) translation methods comparable to autoregressive (AT) methods in terms of translation quality.
- However, evaluating NAT using BLEU has been shown to have a weak correlation with human annotations.
- Limited research has comprehensively compared NAT and AT, leaving uncertainty about how close NAT is to AT in performance.
Plain English Explanation
Recent breakthroughs have allowed non-autoregressive translation (NAT) methods to achieve translation quality similar to autoregressive translation (AT) methods. But the standard evaluation metric, BLEU, doesn't seem to accurately reflect how humans judge the quality of NAT outputs. There hasn't been much research that thoroughly compares NAT and AT across different measures, so it's unclear how close NAT really is to the performance of AT.
Technical Explanation
To address this gap, the researchers systematically evaluated four representative NAT methods across various dimensions, including human evaluation. Their empirical results show that while the performance gap between NAT and AT has narrowed, state-of-the-art NAT still falls short of AT when using more reliable evaluation metrics. Furthermore, they discovered that explicitly modeling the dependencies between words is crucial for generating natural language and performing well on sequences that are outside the training data.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the human evaluation was conducted on a relatively small scale, so the results may not generalize. Additionally, the researchers only looked at a few NAT methods, and there may be other approaches that could perform better.
One potential issue is that the paper doesn't delve into the specific reasons why NAT methods struggle to match the performance of AT methods, even with the improvements. Understanding the underlying causes could help guide future research to address these limitations.
Conclusion
Overall, this research provides a more comprehensive comparison of non-autoregressive and autoregressive translation methods, demonstrating that while NAT has made significant progress, it still lags behind AT on more reliable evaluation metrics, particularly when it comes to generating natural-sounding language. The findings suggest that explicitly modeling dependencies between words is a crucial component for achieving high-quality translation. These insights can help inform the development of more advanced NAT techniques that can truly rival the performance of autoregressive models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌀
0
What Have We Achieved on Non-autoregressive Translation?
Yafu Li, Huajian Zhang, Jianhao Yan, Yongjing Yin, Yue Zhang
Recent advances have made non-autoregressive (NAT) translation comparable to autoregressive methods (AT). However, their evaluation using BLEU has been shown to weakly correlate with human annotations. Limited research compares non-autoregressive translation and autoregressive translation comprehensively, leaving uncertainty about the true proximity of NAT to AT. To address this gap, we systematically evaluate four representative NAT methods across various dimensions, including human evaluation. Our empirical results demonstrate that despite narrowing the performance gap, state-of-the-art NAT still underperforms AT under more reliable evaluation metrics. Furthermore, we discover that explicitly modeling dependencies is crucial for generating natural language and generalizing to out-of-distribution sequences.
Read more5/22/2024
🧠
0
Shared Latent Space by Both Languages in Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation
DongNyeong Heo, Heeyoul Choi
Non-autoregressive neural machine translation (NAT) offers substantial translation speed up compared to autoregressive neural machine translation (AT) at the cost of translation quality. Latent variable modeling has emerged as a promising approach to bridge this quality gap, particularly for addressing the chronic multimodality problem in NAT. In the previous works that used latent variable modeling, they added an auxiliary model to estimate the posterior distribution of the latent variable conditioned on the source and target sentences. However, it causes several disadvantages, such as redundant information extraction in the latent variable, increasing the number of parameters, and a tendency to ignore some information from the inputs. In this paper, we propose a novel latent variable modeling that integrates a dual reconstruction perspective and an advanced hierarchical latent modeling with a shared intermediate latent space across languages. This latent variable modeling hypothetically alleviates or prevents the above disadvantages. In our experiment results, we present comprehensive demonstrations that our proposed approach infers superior latent variables which lead better translation quality. Finally, in the benchmark translation tasks, such as WMT, we demonstrate that our proposed method significantly improves translation quality compared to previous NAT baselines including the state-of-the-art NAT model.
Read more9/10/2024
0
CTC-based Non-autoregressive Textless Speech-to-Speech Translation
Qingkai Fang, Zhengrui Ma, Yan Zhou, Min Zhang, Yang Feng
Direct speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) has achieved impressive translation quality, but it often faces the challenge of slow decoding due to the considerable length of speech sequences. Recently, some research has turned to non-autoregressive (NAR) models to expedite decoding, yet the translation quality typically lags behind autoregressive (AR) models significantly. In this paper, we investigate the performance of CTC-based NAR models in S2ST, as these models have shown impressive results in machine translation. Experimental results demonstrate that by combining pretraining, knowledge distillation, and advanced NAR training techniques such as glancing training and non-monotonic latent alignments, CTC-based NAR models achieve translation quality comparable to the AR model, while preserving up to 26.81$times$ decoding speedup.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Revisiting Non-Autoregressive Transformers for Efficient Image Synthesis
Zanlin Ni, Yulin Wang, Renping Zhou, Jiayi Guo, Jinyi Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Shiji Song, Yuan Yao, Gao Huang
The field of image synthesis is currently flourishing due to the advancements in diffusion models. While diffusion models have been successful, their computational intensity has prompted the pursuit of more efficient alternatives. As a representative work, non-autoregressive Transformers (NATs) have been recognized for their rapid generation. However, a major drawback of these models is their inferior performance compared to diffusion models. In this paper, we aim to re-evaluate the full potential of NATs by revisiting the design of their training and inference strategies. Specifically, we identify the complexities in properly configuring these strategies and indicate the possible sub-optimality in existing heuristic-driven designs. Recognizing this, we propose to go beyond existing methods by directly solving the optimal strategies in an automatic framework. The resulting method, named AutoNAT, advances the performance boundaries of NATs notably, and is able to perform comparably with the latest diffusion models at a significantly reduced inference cost. The effectiveness of AutoNAT is validated on four benchmark datasets, i.e., ImageNet-256 & 512, MS-COCO, and CC3M. Our code is available at https://github.com/LeapLabTHU/ImprovedNAT.
Read more6/11/2024