What is the best model? Application-driven Evaluation for Large Language Models
2406.10307
0
0
Abstract
General large language models enhanced with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback are increasingly popular in academia and industry as they generalize foundation models to various practical tasks in a prompt manner. To assist users in selecting the best model in practical application scenarios, i.e., choosing the model that meets the application requirements while minimizing cost, we introduce A-Eval, an application-driven LLMs evaluation benchmark for general large language models. First, we categorize evaluation tasks into five main categories and 27 sub-categories from a practical application perspective. Next, we construct a dataset comprising 678 question-and-answer pairs through a process of collecting, annotating, and reviewing. Then, we design an objective and effective evaluation method and evaluate a series of LLMs of different scales on A-Eval. Finally, we reveal interesting laws regarding model scale and task difficulty level and propose a feasible method for selecting the best model. Through A-Eval, we provide clear empirical and engineer guidance for selecting the best model, reducing barriers to selecting and using LLMs and promoting their application and development. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/UnicomAI/DataSet/tree/main/TestData/GeneralAbility.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores application-driven evaluation of large language models (LLMs) to determine the "best" model for specific tasks.
- It argues that traditional benchmarks may not capture the real-world performance of LLMs, and proposes a framework for evaluating models based on their ability to solve practical problems.
- The authors present several case studies applying this framework to evaluate LLMs on tasks like summarization, medical diagnosis, and debate.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about finding the best large language model (LLM) for practical, real-world tasks. Traditional ways of evaluating LLMs, like using benchmark tests, may not give a complete picture of how the models perform in actual applications.
The authors propose a new approach where they evaluate LLMs based on how well they can solve specific problems, like summarizing long documents or providing medical diagnoses. They present several case studies showing how this "application-driven" evaluation can lead to different conclusions about which LLM is the "best" compared to standard benchmark tests.
For example, an LLM that does well on a general language test may not be the best choice for a task like medical diagnosis, where specialized knowledge and reasoning are more important. The paper argues that to truly determine the "best" LLM, we need to evaluate them on the actual tasks we want them to perform, not just general language abilities.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews existing approaches to evaluating LLMs, including generic benchmark tests and specialized temporal generalization tests. It then proposes an "application-driven" evaluation framework where LLMs are assessed on their ability to solve specific real-world problems.
The authors present several case studies applying this framework. For medical diagnosis, they evaluate LLMs on their ability to provide accurate diagnoses based on patient symptoms. For debate, they assess LLMs' performance in engaging in structured debates. And for summarization, they measure LLMs' capacity to generate concise and informative summaries.
The results show that the "best" LLM can vary depending on the specific application. For example, an LLM that performs well on general language benchmarks may not be the most effective for medical diagnosis, where domain-specific knowledge is crucial. The authors argue that to truly determine the "best" LLM, we need to evaluate them on the actual tasks we want them to perform.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for application-driven evaluation of LLMs, highlighting the limitations of generic benchmarks. However, the authors acknowledge that their approach also has potential drawbacks. Developing robust application-specific evaluation frameworks can be resource-intensive, and the results may not generalize beyond the specific tasks tested.
Additionally, the paper does not address the challenges of scaling this approach to the vast number of potential applications for LLMs. Selecting the "right" set of applications to evaluate may be difficult, and the results may be heavily influenced by the choice of tasks.
Further research is needed to explore ways to make application-driven evaluation more efficient and comprehensive. Potential avenues include developing automated tools for generating application-specific evaluation tasks or leveraging transfer learning to apply insights from one domain to another.
Conclusion
This paper presents a strong argument for moving beyond generic LLM benchmarks and instead evaluating models based on their ability to solve real-world problems. The case studies demonstrate that the "best" LLM can vary depending on the specific application, underscoring the need for a more nuanced and application-oriented approach to model selection.
While the proposed framework has some limitations, the authors' work highlights the importance of understanding LLMs' practical capabilities and limitations. As these powerful language models become increasingly integrated into various applications, carefully evaluating their performance in context-specific tasks will be crucial for ensuring they are deployed effectively and responsibly.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
PRE: A Peer Review Based Large Language Model Evaluator
Zhumin Chu, Qingyao Ai, Yiteng Tu, Haitao Li, Yiqun Liu
0
0
The impressive performance of large language models (LLMs) has attracted considerable attention from the academic and industrial communities. Besides how to construct and train LLMs, how to effectively evaluate and compare the capacity of LLMs has also been well recognized as an important yet difficult problem. Existing paradigms rely on either human annotators or model-based evaluators to evaluate the performance of LLMs on different tasks. However, these paradigms often suffer from high cost, low generalizability, and inherited biases in practice, which make them incapable of supporting the sustainable development of LLMs in long term. In order to address these issues, inspired by the peer review systems widely used in academic publication process, we propose a novel framework that can automatically evaluate LLMs through a peer-review process. Specifically, for the evaluation of a specific task, we first construct a small qualification exam to select reviewers from a couple of powerful LLMs. Then, to actually evaluate the submissions written by different candidate LLMs, i.e., the evaluatees, we use the reviewer LLMs to rate or compare the submissions. The final ranking of evaluatee LLMs is generated based on the results provided by all reviewers. We conducted extensive experiments on text summarization tasks with eleven LLMs including GPT-4. The results demonstrate the existence of biasness when evaluating using a single LLM. Also, our PRE model outperforms all the baselines, illustrating the effectiveness of the peer review mechanism.
6/4/2024
⛏️
Evaluating LLMs at Evaluating Temporal Generalization
Chenghao Zhu, Nuo Chen, Yufei Gao, Benyou Wang
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the urgent need for evolving evaluation methodologies that keep pace with improvements in language comprehension and information processing. However, traditional benchmarks, which are often static, fail to capture the continually changing information landscape, leading to a disparity between the perceived and actual effectiveness of LLMs in ever-changing real-world scenarios. Furthermore, these benchmarks do not adequately measure the models' capabilities over a broader temporal range or their adaptability over time. We examine current LLMs in terms of temporal generalization and bias, revealing that various temporal biases emerge in both language likelihood and prognostic prediction. This serves as a caution for LLM practitioners to pay closer attention to mitigating temporal biases. Also, we propose an evaluation framework Freshbench for dynamically generating benchmarks from the most recent real-world prognostication prediction. Our code is available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/FreshBench. The dataset will be released soon.
5/15/2024
A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations
Jinqiang Wang, Huansheng Ning, Yi Peng, Qikai Wei, Daniel Tesfai, Wenwei Mao, Tao Zhu, Runhe Huang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated surprising performance across various natural language processing tasks. Recently, medical LLMs enhanced with domain-specific knowledge have exhibited excellent capabilities in medical consultation and diagnosis. These models can smoothly simulate doctor-patient dialogues and provide professional medical advice. Most medical LLMs are developed through continued training of open-source general LLMs, which require significantly fewer computational resources than training LLMs from scratch. Additionally, this approach offers better protection of patient privacy compared to API-based solutions. This survey systematically explores how to train medical LLMs based on general LLMs. It covers: (a) how to acquire training corpus and construct customized medical training sets, (b) how to choose a appropriate training paradigm, (c) how to choose a suitable evaluation benchmark, and (d) existing challenges and promising future research directions are discussed. This survey can provide guidance for the development of LLMs focused on various medical applications, such as medical education, diagnostic planning, and clinical assistants.
6/18/2024
💬
Evaluating large language models in medical applications: a survey
Xiaolan Chen, Jiayang Xiang, Shanfu Lu, Yexin Liu, Mingguang He, Danli Shi
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with transformative potential across numerous domains, including healthcare and medicine. In the medical domain, LLMs hold promise for tasks ranging from clinical decision support to patient education. However, evaluating the performance of LLMs in medical contexts presents unique challenges due to the complex and critical nature of medical information. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the landscape of medical LLM evaluation, synthesizing insights from existing studies and highlighting evaluation data sources, task scenarios, and evaluation methods. Additionally, it identifies key challenges and opportunities in medical LLM evaluation, emphasizing the need for continued research and innovation to ensure the responsible integration of LLMs into clinical practice.
5/14/2024