When Do Universal Image Jailbreaks Transfer Between Vision-Language Models?

Overview

• New AI models that can process both images and text offer exciting capabilities, but also raise concerns about potential vulnerabilities to adversarial attacks.
• This study focuses on a class of AI models called vision-language models (VLMs), which generate text outputs based on visual and textual inputs.
• The researchers conducted a large-scale investigation to assess the transferability of gradient-based "jailbreak" attacks on over 40 open-parameter VLMs.

Plain English Explanation

The integration of visual and language processing capabilities into AI systems has led to the development of powerful vision-language models that can generate text outputs based on both images and text. While these models offer exciting new capabilities, there are concerns that they may be vulnerable to adversarial attacks that could manipulate their behavior in undesirable ways.

In this study, the researchers focused on a popular class of vision-language models and conducted a large-scale investigation to assess how well "jailbreak" attacks that work on one model can transfer to other models. Jailbreak attacks are designed to bypass the intended behavior and outputs of an AI system. The researchers tested this transferability across a diverse set of over 40 open-parameter VLMs, including 18 new models that they released publicly.

The key finding is that it is extremely difficult to obtain transferable gradient-based jailbreak attacks against these VLMs. When a jailbreak attack is optimized against a single VLM or an ensemble of VLMs, it successfully jailbreaks the attacked model(s), but exhibits little to no transfer to any other VLMs. This lack of transferability holds true regardless of factors like whether the models share the same vision or language components, or whether the language model has undergone specialized training for safety and instruction-following.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a large-scale empirical study to assess the transferability of gradient-based universal image jailbreaks across a diverse set of over 40 open-parameter vision-language models (VLMs), including 18 new VLMs that they publicly released.

They found that transferable gradient-based image jailbreaks are extremely difficult to obtain. When an image jailbreak is optimized against a single VLM or an ensemble of VLMs, the jailbreak successfully jailbreaks the attacked VLM(s), but exhibits little-to-no transfer to any other VLMs. This lack of transfer is not affected by factors such as whether the attacked and target VLMs possess matching vision backbones or language models, whether the language model underwent instruction-following and/or safety-alignment training, or many other characteristics.

The researchers did identify two settings where they observed partially successful transfer:

1. Between identically-pretrained and identically-initialized VLMs with slightly different VLM training data.
2. Between different training checkpoints of a single VLM.

Leveraging these insights, the researchers demonstrated that transfer can be significantly improved against a specific target VLM by attacking larger ensembles of highly-similar VLMs.

These results stand in stark contrast to existing evidence of universal and transferable text jailbreaks against language models and transferable adversarial attacks against image classifiers, suggesting that VLMs may be more robust to gradient-based transfer attacks.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a thorough and rigorous empirical investigation of the transferability of gradient-based jailbreak attacks against a diverse set of vision-language models. Their findings suggest that these models may be more resilient to such attacks compared to other AI systems, which is an important insight for the field.

However, the study is limited to a specific type of attack (gradient-based) and a particular class of AI models (VLMs). It would be valuable to explore the transferability of other forms of jailbreak attacks, such as those that leverage different optimization techniques or exploit different vulnerabilities. Additionally, the researchers note that their findings may not generalize to other multimodal AI systems beyond VLMs.

Further research is needed to fully understand the security and robustness of these emerging AI technologies. Investigating other attack vectors, exploring the underlying reasons for the observed lack of transferability, and expanding the analysis to a broader range of multimodal models could provide valuable insights for developing more secure and reliable AI systems.

Conclusion

This study provides a substantial contribution to our understanding of the security of vision-language models (VLMs), a rapidly advancing class of AI systems that can process both visual and textual inputs. The researchers conducted a large-scale empirical investigation and found that transferable gradient-based jailbreak attacks are extremely difficult to obtain against VLMs, in contrast to the success of such attacks against other AI models.

These results suggest that VLMs may be more robust to certain types of adversarial manipulation, which has important implications for the continued development and deployment of these powerful AI systems. As the integration of visual and language processing capabilities in AI becomes more prevalent, understanding and addressing potential vulnerabilities will be crucial to ensuring the safety and reliability of these technologies.