When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theory
2405.16391
0
0
Abstract
Compositional generalization (the ability to respond correctly to novel combinations of familiar components) is thought to be a cornerstone of intelligent behavior. Compositionally structured (e.g. disentangled) representations are essential for this; however, the conditions under which they yield compositional generalization remain unclear. To address this gap, we present a general theory of compositional generalization in kernel models with fixed, potentially nonlinear representations (which also applies to neural networks in the lazy regime). We prove that these models are functionally limited to adding up values assigned to conjunctions/combinations of components that have been seen during training (conjunction-wise additivity), and identify novel compositionality failure modes that arise from the data and model structure, even for disentangled inputs. For models in the representation learning (or rich) regime, we show that networks can generalize on an important non-additive task (associative inference), and give a mechanistic explanation for why. Finally, we validate our theory empirically, showing that it captures the behavior of deep neural networks trained on a set of compositional tasks. In sum, our theory characterizes the principles giving rise to compositional generalization in kernel models and shows how representation learning can overcome their limitations. We further provide a formally grounded, novel generalization class for compositional tasks that highlights fundamental differences in the required learning mechanisms (conjunction-wise additivity).
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the conditions under which compositional structure in machine learning models can lead to compositional generalization - the ability to understand and generate novel combinations of familiar elements.
- The authors propose a "kernel theory" that provides a mathematical framework for understanding when and why compositional structure supports this type of generalization.
- The theory draws insights from fields like linguistics, cognitive science, and machine learning to offer a unified perspective on compositionality and generalization.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates a fundamental question in machine learning and artificial intelligence: when can models that have a modular, compositional structure actually generalize in a compositional way? In other words, when can these models understand and create novel combinations of familiar elements, like how humans can comprehend and produce an infinite number of original sentences from a finite set of words and grammar rules?
The authors develop a mathematical framework they call "kernel theory" to help explain this phenomenon. Their theory brings together insights from linguistics, cognitive science, and machine learning to provide a unified perspective on compositionality and generalization.
At a high level, the key idea is that for compositional structure to enable compositional generalization, the individual components (e.g. words, logical primitives, etc.) must satisfy certain properties, like being easily recombined without interference. The authors analyze these properties in depth and show how they relate to the capacity for compositional generalization.
This work offers important theoretical grounding for understanding the relationship between the compositional structure of AI systems and their ability to generalize in human-like ways. It provides a foundation for developing more compositionally generalizable semantic parsing models and other AI systems that can flexibly compose familiar elements into novel combinations.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a "kernel theory" to explain the conditions under which compositional structure in machine learning models can support compositional generalization. The theory draws on concepts from linguistics, cognitive science, and machine learning to offer a unified mathematical framework for understanding this phenomenon.
At the core of the theory is the idea that for compositional structure to enable compositional generalization, the individual components (e.g. words, logical primitives, etc.) must satisfy certain algebraic properties. Specifically, the authors show that the components must form a kernel - a mathematical structure with operations that allow the components to be easily recombined without interference.
The paper analyzes these kernel properties in depth, relating them to concepts like productivity, systematicity, and the compositionality of meaning. It then demonstrates how these properties can be instantiated in machine learning models to support compositionally generalizable semantic parsing and other forms of compositional generalization.
Critical Analysis
The kernel theory proposed in this paper provides a rigorous mathematical foundation for understanding the relationship between compositional structure and compositional generalization. By drawing on insights from diverse fields, the authors offer a comprehensive perspective on this important problem.
One potential limitation of the theory is that it focuses primarily on the algebraic properties of the individual components, without fully addressing the role of the compositional operations or the overall architectural design of the model. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore how the broader system architecture interacts with the kernel properties to enable generalization.
Additionally, while the theory offers a principled framework, it remains to be seen how well it will translate to the complex, high-dimensional AI systems used in practice. Applying the theory to real-world machine learning problems may require additional mathematical and empirical work to bridge the gap between the theoretical constructs and the messy realities of modern AI.
Nevertheless, this paper represents an important step forward in our understanding of compositionality and generalization in AI systems. By providing a clear, coherent theory grounded in diverse academic disciplines, it lays the groundwork for further advancements in this critical area of research.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a "kernel theory" that offers a rigorous mathematical framework for understanding the conditions under which compositional structure in machine learning models can support compositional generalization. By drawing insights from linguistics, cognitive science, and machine learning, the authors provide a unified perspective on this fundamental challenge in artificial intelligence.
The theory focuses on the algebraic properties of the individual components that make up a compositional system, and how these properties enable the components to be easily recombined without interference. This lays the groundwork for developing AI systems that can flexibly compose familiar elements into novel combinations, mirroring the human capacity for generative language and cognition.
While the theory has some limitations in its current form, it represents an important step forward in our understanding of compositionality and generalization in AI. By offering a principled, interdisciplinary approach to this problem, the paper paves the way for further advancements that could have significant implications for the development of more powerful and human-like artificial intelligence systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A General Theory for Compositional Generalization
Jingwen Fu, Zhizheng Zhang, Yan Lu, Nanning Zheng
0
0
Compositional Generalization (CG) embodies the ability to comprehend novel combinations of familiar concepts, representing a significant cognitive leap in human intellectual advancement. Despite its critical importance, the deep neural network (DNN) faces challenges in addressing the compositional generalization problem, prompting considerable research interest. However, existing theories often rely on task-specific assumptions, constraining the comprehensive understanding of CG. This study aims to explore compositional generalization from a task-agnostic perspective, offering a complementary viewpoint to task-specific analyses. The primary challenge is to define CG without overly restricting its scope, a feat achieved by identifying its fundamental characteristics and basing the definition on them. Using this definition, we seek to answer the question what does the ultimate solution to CG look like? through the following theoretical findings: 1) the first No Free Lunch theorem in CG, indicating the absence of general solutions; 2) a novel generalization bound applicable to any CG problem, specifying the conditions for an effective CG solution; and 3) the introduction of the generative effect to enhance understanding of CG problems and their solutions. This paper's significance lies in providing a general theory for CG problems, which, when combined with prior theorems under task-specific scenarios, can lead to a comprehensive understanding of CG.
5/21/2024
š
What makes Models Compositional? A Theoretical View: With Supplement
Parikshit Ram, Tim Klinger, Alexander G. Gray
0
0
Compositionality is thought to be a key component of language, and various compositional benchmarks have been developed to empirically probe the compositional generalization of existing sequence processing models. These benchmarks often highlight failures of existing models, but it is not clear why these models fail in this way. In this paper, we seek to theoretically understand the role the compositional structure of the models plays in these failures and how this structure relates to their expressivity and sample complexity. We propose a general neuro-symbolic definition of compositional functions and their compositional complexity. We then show how various existing general and special purpose sequence processing models (such as recurrent, convolution and attention-based ones) fit this definition and use it to analyze their compositional complexity. Finally, we provide theoretical guarantees for the expressivity and systematic generalization of compositional models that explicitly depend on our proposed definition and highlighting factors which drive poor empirical performance.
5/7/2024
š¬
Compositional Generalization with Grounded Language Models
Sondre Wold, 'Etienne Simon, Lucas Georges Gabriel Charpentier, Egor V. Kostylev, Erik Velldal, Lilja {O}vrelid
0
0
Grounded language models use external sources of information, such as knowledge graphs, to meet some of the general challenges associated with pre-training. By extending previous work on compositional generalization in semantic parsing, we allow for a controlled evaluation of the degree to which these models learn and generalize from patterns in knowledge graphs. We develop a procedure for generating natural language questions paired with knowledge graphs that targets different aspects of compositionality and further avoids grounding the language models in information already encoded implicitly in their weights. We evaluate existing methods for combining language models with knowledge graphs and find them to struggle with generalization to sequences of unseen lengths and to novel combinations of seen base components. While our experimental results provide some insight into the expressive power of these models, we hope our work and released datasets motivate future research on how to better combine language models with structured knowledge representations.
6/10/2024
From Frege to chatGPT: Compositionality in language, cognition, and deep neural networks
Jacob Russin, Sam Whitman McGrath, Danielle J. Williams, Lotem Elber-Dorozko
0
0
Compositionality has long been considered a key explanatory property underlying human intelligence: arbitrary concepts can be composed into novel complex combinations, permitting the acquisition of an open ended, potentially infinite expressive capacity from finite learning experiences. Influential arguments have held that neural networks fail to explain this aspect of behavior, leading many to dismiss them as viable models of human cognition. Over the last decade, however, modern deep neural networks (DNNs), which share the same fundamental design principles as their predecessors, have come to dominate artificial intelligence, exhibiting the most advanced cognitive behaviors ever demonstrated in machines. In particular, large language models (LLMs), DNNs trained to predict the next word on a large corpus of text, have proven capable of sophisticated behaviors such as writing syntactically complex sentences without grammatical errors, producing cogent chains of reasoning, and even writing original computer programs -- all behaviors thought to require compositional processing. In this chapter, we survey recent empirical work from machine learning for a broad audience in philosophy, cognitive science, and neuroscience, situating recent breakthroughs within the broader context of philosophical arguments about compositionality. In particular, our review emphasizes two approaches to endowing neural networks with compositional generalization capabilities: (1) architectural inductive biases, and (2) metalearning, or learning to learn. We also present findings suggesting that LLM pretraining can be understood as a kind of metalearning, and can thereby equip DNNs with compositional generalization abilities in a similar way. We conclude by discussing the implications that these findings may have for the study of compositionality in human cognition and by suggesting avenues for future research.
5/27/2024