Compositional Generalization with Grounded Language Models
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• The paper explores the concept of compositional generalization in the context of large language models. • It investigates the ability of these models to understand and generate language in a compositional manner, where complex meanings are built up from simpler building blocks. • The research aims to provide insights into the limitations and potential of existing language models when it comes to generalization beyond their training data.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well large language models, like the ones used in chatbots and virtual assistants, can understand and generate language in a compositional way. Compositional language means that complex meanings are built up from smaller building blocks, like words and phrases. The researchers wanted to see how good these models are at taking what they've learned and applying it to new situations, beyond just memorizing patterns in their training data. This is an important capability for language models to have, as it allows them to be more flexible and adaptable in real-world communication. The paper provides insights into the limitations of current language models and points to areas where more research is needed to improve their compositional generalization abilities.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the ability of large language models to engage in compositional generalization, which is the capacity to understand and generate language by combining smaller linguistic units in novel ways.
The researchers designed a set of experiments to assess the compositional generalization capabilities of several prominent language models, including GPT-3 and BERT. They tested the models' performance on a range of tasks that required the models to apply their knowledge in compositional ways, such as following instructions to navigate a virtual environment or answering questions about the relationships between objects.
The results suggest that while language models exhibit some compositional abilities, they still struggle to fully generalize their knowledge to novel situations. The models tended to rely on memorizing patterns in the training data rather than genuinely understanding the underlying compositional structure of language.
Critical Analysis
The paper highlights important limitations in the compositional generalization capabilities of current large language models. While these models have achieved impressive results on many language tasks, the research suggests that they may lack a deeper, more flexible understanding of language and its compositional nature.
One potential concern raised in the paper is that language models may be overly reliant on surface-level statistical patterns in their training data, rather than learning more robust, generalizable representations of language. This could make the models vulnerable to compositional deficiencies when faced with novel linguistic compositions.
The authors also note that further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying compositional generalization and how to design language models that can more effectively learn and apply compositional knowledge. Potential avenues for exploration include multimodal approaches, which can leverage information from multiple modalities, and novel architectural or training techniques.
Conclusion
This paper provides important insights into the limitations of current large language models when it comes to compositional generalization. While these models have made remarkable progress in language understanding and generation, the research suggests that they still struggle to truly grasp the compositional nature of language and apply their knowledge in flexible, generalizable ways.
Addressing these limitations is crucial for the continued advancement of natural language processing and the development of AI systems that can engage in more natural, human-like communication. The findings in this paper highlight the need for further research into the fundamental mechanisms underlying compositional generalization and the design of language models that can more effectively learn and apply compositional knowledge.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Compositional Generalization with Grounded Language Models
Sondre Wold, 'Etienne Simon, Lucas Georges Gabriel Charpentier, Egor V. Kostylev, Erik Velldal, Lilja {O}vrelid
Grounded language models use external sources of information, such as knowledge graphs, to meet some of the general challenges associated with pre-training. By extending previous work on compositional generalization in semantic parsing, we allow for a controlled evaluation of the degree to which these models learn and generalize from patterns in knowledge graphs. We develop a procedure for generating natural language questions paired with knowledge graphs that targets different aspects of compositionality and further avoids grounding the language models in information already encoded implicitly in their weights. We evaluate existing methods for combining language models with knowledge graphs and find them to struggle with generalization to sequences of unseen lengths and to novel combinations of seen base components. While our experimental results provide some insight into the expressive power of these models, we hope our work and released datasets motivate future research on how to better combine language models with structured knowledge representations.
Read more6/10/2024
💬
0
Towards Compositionally Generalizable Semantic Parsing in Large Language Models: A Survey
Amogh Mannekote
Compositional generalization is the ability of a model to generalize to complex, previously unseen types of combinations of entities from just having seen the primitives. This type of generalization is particularly relevant to the semantic parsing community for applications such as task-oriented dialogue, text-to-SQL parsing, and information retrieval, as they can harbor infinite complexity. Despite the success of large language models (LLMs) in a wide range of NLP tasks, unlocking perfect compositional generalization still remains one of the few last unsolved frontiers. The past few years has seen a surge of interest in works that explore the limitations of, methods to improve, and evaluation metrics for compositional generalization capabilities of LLMs for semantic parsing tasks. In this work, we present a literature survey geared at synthesizing recent advances in analysis, methods, and evaluation schemes to offer a starting point for both practitioners and researchers in this area.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine Translation
Ryoma Kumon, Daiki Matsuoka, Hitomi Yanaka
Compositional generalization refers to the ability to generalize to novel combinations of previously observed words and syntactic structures. Since it is regarded as a desired property of neural models, recent work has assessed compositional generalization in machine translation as well as semantic parsing. However, previous evaluations with machine translation have focused mostly on lexical generalization (i.e., generalization to unseen combinations of known words). Thus, it remains unclear to what extent models can translate sentences that require structural generalization (i.e., generalization to different sorts of syntactic structures). To address this question, we construct SGET, a machine translation dataset covering various types of compositional generalization with control of words and sentence structures. We evaluate neural machine translation models on SGET and show that they struggle more in structural generalization than in lexical generalization. We also find different performance trends in semantic parsing and machine translation, which indicates the importance of evaluations across various tasks.
Read more6/21/2024
0
When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theory
Samuel Lippl, Kim Stachenfeld
Compositional generalization (the ability to respond correctly to novel combinations of familiar components) is thought to be a cornerstone of intelligent behavior. Compositionally structured (e.g. disentangled) representations are essential for this; however, the conditions under which they yield compositional generalization remain unclear. To address this gap, we present a general theory of compositional generalization in kernel models with fixed, potentially nonlinear representations (which also applies to neural networks in the lazy regime). We prove that these models are functionally limited to adding up values assigned to conjunctions/combinations of components that have been seen during training (conjunction-wise additivity), and identify novel compositionality failure modes that arise from the data and model structure, even for disentangled inputs. For models in the representation learning (or rich) regime, we show that networks can generalize on an important non-additive task (associative inference), and give a mechanistic explanation for why. Finally, we validate our theory empirically, showing that it captures the behavior of deep neural networks trained on a set of compositional tasks. In sum, our theory characterizes the principles giving rise to compositional generalization in kernel models and shows how representation learning can overcome their limitations. We further provide a formally grounded, novel generalization class for compositional tasks that highlights fundamental differences in the required learning mechanisms (conjunction-wise additivity).
Read more5/28/2024