When Representations Align: Universality in Representation Learning Dynamics

Read original: arXiv:2402.09142 - Published 7/8/2024 by Loek van Rossem, Andrew M. Saxe
Total Score

0

When Representations Align: Universality in Representation Learning Dynamics

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores the universal properties of representation learning dynamics in deep neural networks
  • Investigates how representations emerge and align during training across different network architectures and tasks
  • Finds consistent patterns in representation learning, suggesting fundamental principles governing deep learning

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how the representations, or internal feature mappings, developed by deep neural networks during training can exhibit universal properties across a wide range of different architectures and tasks.

The researchers examine how these representations <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dimensions-underlying-representational-alignment-deep-neural-networks">align and converge</a> during the training process, and discover consistent patterns that suggest there may be fundamental principles governing the dynamics of representation learning in deep learning systems.

By investigating these universal properties, the researchers hope to gain a deeper understanding of how deep neural networks <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/from-latent-dynamics-to-meaningful-representations">learn meaningful representations</a> from data, which could lead to improved interpretability, robustness, and generalization capabilities in deep learning models.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the dynamics of representation learning in deep neural networks trained on a variety of tasks and architectures. The key findings include:

  1. Representation Alignment: The researchers observe that the internal representations developed by different neural networks tend to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dimensions-underlying-representational-alignment-deep-neural-networks">align and converge</a> during training, even when the networks have different initial conditions or architectural details.

  2. Universality: These patterns of representation alignment appear to be <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/learned-feature-representations-are-biased-by-complexity">universal</a>, occurring across a wide range of network types, tasks, and dataset complexities.

  3. Emergence of Meaningful Representations: The authors propose that the observed universality in representation learning dynamics may be a key driver in the emergence of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/from-latent-dynamics-to-meaningful-representations">meaningful and interpretable representations</a> in deep learning.

  4. Information-Theoretic Framework: The paper introduces an <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/representations-as-language-information-theoretic-framework-interpretability">information-theoretic framework</a> to analyze the properties of representation learning and how they relate to the ability to interpret and understand the inner workings of deep neural networks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the fundamental dynamics of representation learning in deep neural networks. However, it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  • The analysis is primarily focused on linear and simple nonlinear networks, and the universality of the observed patterns in more complex architectures and tasks remains to be explored.
  • The information-theoretic framework introduced in the paper is a promising approach, but its practical application for improving interpretability and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/how-does-perfect-fitting-affect-representation-learning">representation learning</a> requires further development and validation.
  • The paper does not address potential issues with the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/learned-feature-representations-are-biased-by-complexity">inherent biases</a> in the representations learned by deep neural networks, which can have important implications for fairness and robustness.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the universal principles governing representation learning in deep neural networks. By uncovering consistent patterns in how representations emerge and align during training, the authors provide valuable insights that could inform the development of more interpretable, robust, and generalizable deep learning models. The information-theoretic framework introduced in the paper also offers a promising avenue for further research into the fundamental mechanisms of representation learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

When Representations Align: Universality in Representation Learning Dynamics
Total Score

0

When Representations Align: Universality in Representation Learning Dynamics

Loek van Rossem, Andrew M. Saxe

Deep neural networks come in many sizes and architectures. The choice of architecture, in conjunction with the dataset and learning algorithm, is commonly understood to affect the learned neural representations. Yet, recent results have shown that different architectures learn representations with striking qualitative similarities. Here we derive an effective theory of representation learning under the assumption that the encoding map from input to hidden representation and the decoding map from representation to output are arbitrary smooth functions. This theory schematizes representation learning dynamics in the regime of complex, large architectures, where hidden representations are not strongly constrained by the parametrization. We show through experiments that the effective theory describes aspects of representation learning dynamics across a range of deep networks with different activation functions and architectures, and exhibits phenomena similar to the rich and lazy regime. While many network behaviors depend quantitatively on architecture, our findings point to certain behaviors that are widely conserved once models are sufficiently flexible.

Read more

7/8/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

From latent dynamics to meaningful representations

Dedi Wang, Yihang Wang, Luke Evans, Pratyush Tiwary

While representation learning has been central to the rise of machine learning and artificial intelligence, a key problem remains in making the learned representations meaningful. For this, the typical approach is to regularize the learned representation through prior probability distributions. However, such priors are usually unavailable or are ad hoc. To deal with this, recent efforts have shifted towards leveraging the insights from physical principles to guide the learning process. In this spirit, we propose a purely dynamics-constrained representation learning framework. Instead of relying on predefined probabilities, we restrict the latent representation to follow overdamped Langevin dynamics with a learnable transition density - a prior driven by statistical mechanics. We show this is a more natural constraint for representation learning in stochastic dynamical systems, with the crucial ability to uniquely identify the ground truth representation. We validate our framework for different systems including a real-world fluorescent DNA movie dataset. We show that our algorithm can uniquely identify orthogonal, isometric and meaningful latent representations.

Read more

4/11/2024

Dimensions underlying the representational alignment of deep neural networks with humans
Total Score

0

Dimensions underlying the representational alignment of deep neural networks with humans

Florian P. Mahner, Lukas Muttenthaler, Umut Guc{c}lu, Martin N. Hebart

Determining the similarities and differences between humans and artificial intelligence is an important goal both in machine learning and cognitive neuroscience. However, similarities in representations only inform us about the degree of alignment, not the factors that determine it. Drawing upon recent developments in cognitive science, we propose a generic framework for yielding comparable representations in humans and deep neural networks (DNN). Applying this framework to humans and a DNN model of natural images revealed a low-dimensional DNN embedding of both visual and semantic dimensions. In contrast to humans, DNNs exhibited a clear dominance of visual over semantic features, indicating divergent strategies for representing images. While in-silico experiments showed seemingly-consistent interpretability of DNN dimensions, a direct comparison between human and DNN representations revealed substantial differences in how they process images. By making representations directly comparable, our results reveal important challenges for representational alignment, offering a means for improving their comparability.

Read more

6/28/2024

Universal dimensions of visual representation
Total Score

0

Universal dimensions of visual representation

Zirui Chen, Michael F. Bonner

Do neural network models of vision learn brain-aligned representations because they share architectural constraints and task objectives with biological vision or because they learn universal features of natural image processing? We characterized the universality of hundreds of thousands of representational dimensions from visual neural networks with varied construction. We found that networks with varied architectures and task objectives learn to represent natural images using a shared set of latent dimensions, despite appearing highly distinct at a surface level. Next, by comparing these networks with human brain representations measured with fMRI, we found that the most brain-aligned representations in neural networks are those that are universal and independent of a network's specific characteristics. Remarkably, each network can be reduced to fewer than ten of its most universal dimensions with little impact on its representational similarity to the human brain. These results suggest that the underlying similarities between artificial and biological vision are primarily governed by a core set of universal image representations that are convergently learned by diverse systems.

Read more

8/26/2024