Why do you cite? An investigation on citation intents and decision-making classification processes

Overview

• Examines the importance of accurately classifying the intent behind citations in scholarly work
• Presents an advanced ensemble model for Citation Intent Classification (CIC) that leverages Language Models (LMs) and Explainable AI (XAI) techniques
• Demonstrates the critical role of section titles in improving classification performance
• Introduces a web application for classifying citation intents
• Achieves state-of-the-art performance on the SciCite benchmark

Plain English Explanation

When researchers cite other scholarly works in their own papers, they are doing so for specific reasons. Understanding these citation intents is essential for gaining deeper insights into the nature of scientific contributions and assessing their true impact. Most metrics used to analyze these conceptual links are based on simple quantitative observations, but there is a rich world of meaning behind each citation that needs to be effectively revealed.

This study emphasizes the importance of accurately classifying citation intents to provide more comprehensive and insightful analyses in research assessment. The researchers present an advanced ensemble model that combines Language Models (LMs) and Explainable AI (XAI) techniques to classify citation intents with high accuracy and interpretability.

One of the key findings is that the inclusion of section titles as a feature significantly enhances the classification performance. The researchers also introduce a web application that allows users to classify citation intents, and their model achieves a new state-of-the-art result on the SciCite benchmark.

Overall, this research provides valuable insights for developing more robust datasets and methodologies, ultimately fostering a deeper understanding of scholarly communication.

Technical Explanation

The study presents two ensemble classifiers for the Citation Intent Classification (CIC) task. The first ensemble utilizes fine-tuned SciBERT and XLNet Language Models (LMs) as baselines, while the second ensemble incorporates additional features, including section titles.

The researchers demonstrate that the inclusion of section titles as a feature significantly improves the classification performance. This finding suggests that the contextual information provided by section titles is crucial for accurately determining the intent behind a citation.

To enhance the interpretability and trustworthiness of the models' predictions, the researchers employ Explainable AI (XAI) techniques. These techniques provide insights into the decision-making processes, highlighting the contributions of individual words for level-0 classifications and the individual models for the metaclassification.

One of the ensemble models sets a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) with an 89.46% Macro-F1 score on the SciCite benchmark, a widely used dataset for citation intent classification. The web application developed as part of this study allows users to classify citation intents, further demonstrating the practical applications of this research.

The study's findings suggest that the inclusion of section titles significantly enhances classification performances in the CIC task. The integration of XAI techniques provides valuable insights into the models' decision-making, fostering a deeper understanding of the underlying factors that influence citation intents.

Critical Analysis

The study presents a robust and well-designed approach to citation intent classification, leveraging advanced ensemble strategies and incorporating state-of-the-art Language Models and Explainable AI techniques. The inclusion of section titles as a feature is a particularly insightful contribution, as it highlights the importance of contextual information in accurately determining citation intents.

However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of the study, such as the generalizability of the findings to other datasets or domains, or the potential biases or errors in the underlying citation datasets. Additionally, the authors do not discuss the potential ethical implications of their work, such as the use of citation data for research assessment or the potential misuse of citation intent classification.

Furthermore, while the web application is a valuable contribution, the paper does not provide details on its usage, user feedback, or plans for further development and deployment. Addressing these aspects could enhance the practical impact of the research.

Overall, the study makes a significant contribution to the field of citation analysis and research assessment, but there is room for further exploration and critical analysis of the limitations and potential implications of the work.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the importance of accurately classifying citation intents in scholarly communication, which is essential for gaining deeper insights into the nature of scientific contributions and assessing their true impact. The researchers present an advanced ensemble model that leverages Language Models and Explainable AI techniques to achieve state-of-the-art performance on the SciCite benchmark.

One of the key findings is the critical role of section titles in improving classification performance, underscoring the importance of contextual information in accurately determining citation intents. The integration of Explainable AI techniques provides valuable insights into the models' decision-making processes, fostering a deeper understanding of the factors that influence citation practices.

The introduction of a web application for citation intent classification further demonstrates the practical applications of this research. Overall, this study offers important insights for developing more robust datasets and methodologies, ultimately contributing to a deeper understanding of scholarly communication and its impact.