WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detection

Read original: arXiv:2101.01456 - Published 7/18/2024 by Bojia Zi, Minghao Chang, Jingjing Chen, Xingjun Ma, Yu-Gang Jiang
Total Score

0

🔎

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new dataset called "WildDeepfake" that contains real-world deepfake videos collected from the internet, in contrast to existing datasets that use limited actors and software.
  • The authors evaluate baseline deepfake detection models on both existing datasets and the new WildDeepfake dataset, finding that the new dataset poses a greater challenge for detection.
  • The authors propose two attention-based deepfake detection networks (ADDNets) that leverage attention masks on real and fake faces to improve detection performance.

Plain English Explanation

Deepfakes are manipulated videos that use face-swapping technology to replace one person's face with another. As this technology has become more accessible, there have been growing concerns about its potential for abuse, such as creating fake videos to spread misinformation. To address this, researchers have been working on deepfake detection - developing algorithms that can identify whether a video is real or a deepfake.

To support the development of deepfake detectors, several datasets of real and fake videos have been released, like DeepfakeDetection and FaceForensics++. However, these datasets often use a limited number of volunteer actors and a few popular deepfake software tools. As a result, detectors trained on these datasets may not be as effective against the diverse range of deepfakes found on the internet.

To address this issue, the researchers created a new dataset called "WildDeepfake" that consists of over 7,000 face sequences extracted from 707 deepfake videos collected from the internet. This dataset provides a more realistic and challenging test for deepfake detectors.

The researchers evaluated several baseline deepfake detection models on both the existing datasets and the new WildDeepfake dataset. They found that the detection performance decreased significantly on the WildDeepfake dataset, indicating that it is a more challenging test of a detector's abilities.

To improve deepfake detection, the researchers also proposed two new models, called Attention-based Deepfake Detection Networks (ADDNets), which use attention mechanisms to focus on the key facial features that distinguish real from fake faces. They showed that ADDNets outperformed the baseline models on both the existing datasets and the more challenging WildDeepfake dataset.

Technical Explanation

The researchers created the WildDeepfake dataset to better support the development and evaluation of deepfake detectors. Unlike existing datasets that use a limited number of actors and deepfake software, WildDeepfake contains 7,314 face sequences extracted from 707 deepfake videos collected entirely from the internet.

To evaluate the performance of deepfake detectors, the researchers tested several baseline models, including Face X-ray, Multi-task Capsule, and Xception-based detectors, on both the existing datasets (DeepfakeDetection and FaceForensics++) and the new WildDeepfake dataset. They found that the detection performance decreased significantly on the WildDeepfake dataset, indicating that it poses a more challenging test for deepfake detectors.

To improve deepfake detection, the researchers proposed two new models called ADDNets: 2D Attention-based Deepfake Detection Network (2D-ADDN) and 3D Attention-based Deepfake Detection Network (3D-ADDN). These models leverage attention mechanisms to focus on the critical facial features that distinguish real from fake faces.

The 2D-ADDN model uses 2D convolutional layers to extract visual features from individual frames, while the 3D-ADDN model uses 3D convolutional layers to capture both spatial and temporal information from the video sequences. Both models generate attention masks that highlight the regions of the face that are most relevant for distinguishing real from fake.

The researchers evaluated the performance of the ADDNets on the existing datasets and the WildDeepfake dataset. They found that the attention-based models outperformed the baseline detectors on all datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of the attention mechanism for deepfake detection.

Critical Analysis

The introduction of the WildDeepfake dataset is a valuable contribution to the field of deepfake detection. By providing a more diverse and realistic set of deepfake videos, the dataset helps to assess the real-world performance of deepfake detectors, which is crucial as these models will ultimately need to operate in the wild.

However, the WildDeepfake dataset is still relatively small, with only 707 deepfake videos. As the authors acknowledge, expanding the dataset with more diverse and challenging examples could further improve the evaluation of deepfake detectors.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the types of deepfakes in the WildDeepfake dataset, such as the specific deepfake generation methods or the quality of the manipulated videos. This information could help researchers understand the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed detection models and guide the development of more robust approaches.

The proposed ADDNets demonstrate promising results, but further research is needed to understand the generalization capabilities of these models. It would be valuable to evaluate the models on even more diverse datasets, including deepfakes created with the latest generation of AI-powered face-swapping tools, to ensure their effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

The paper introduces the WildDeepfake dataset, a more realistic and challenging benchmark for deepfake detection, and proposes two attention-based deepfake detection models (ADDNets) that outperform baseline detectors on both existing and the new datasets.

The WildDeepfake dataset represents an important step towards developing deepfake detectors that can effectively operate in the real world, where the variety and quality of deepfakes are likely to be much more diverse than what is found in existing datasets. The attention-based ADDNets also demonstrate the potential of leveraging targeted facial features for improved deepfake detection.

As deepfake technology continues to advance, ongoing efforts to create more realistic and challenging benchmarks, as well as innovative detection approaches, will be crucial for protecting against the misuse of this technology and maintaining trust in digital media.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔎

Total Score

0

WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detection

Bojia Zi, Minghao Chang, Jingjing Chen, Xingjun Ma, Yu-Gang Jiang

In recent years, the abuse of a face swap technique called deepfake has raised enormous public concerns. So far, a large number of deepfake videos (known as deepfakes) have been crafted and uploaded to the internet, calling for effective countermeasures. One promising countermeasure against deepfakes is deepfake detection. Several deepfake datasets have been released to support the training and testing of deepfake detectors, such as DeepfakeDetection and FaceForensics++. While this has greatly advanced deepfake detection, most of the real videos in these datasets are filmed with a few volunteer actors in limited scenes, and the fake videos are crafted by researchers using a few popular deepfake softwares. Detectors developed on these datasets may become less effective against real-world deepfakes on the internet. To better support detection against real-world deepfakes, in this paper, we introduce a new dataset WildDeepfake which consists of 7,314 face sequences extracted from 707 deepfake videos collected completely from the internet. WildDeepfake is a small dataset that can be used, in addition to existing datasets, to develop and test the effectiveness of deepfake detectors against real-world deepfakes. We conduct a systematic evaluation of a set of baseline detection networks on both existing and our WildDeepfake datasets, and show that WildDeepfake is indeed a more challenging dataset, where the detection performance can decrease drastically. We also propose two (eg. 2D and 3D) Attention-based Deepfake Detection Networks (ADDNets) to leverage the attention masks on real/fake faces for improved detection. We empirically verify the effectiveness of ADDNets on both existing datasets and WildDeepfake. The dataset is available at: https://github.com/OpenTAI/wild-deepfake.

Read more

7/18/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Deepfake Generation and Detection: A Benchmark and Survey

Gan Pei, Jiangning Zhang, Menghan Hu, Zhenyu Zhang, Chengjie Wang, Yunsheng Wu, Guangtao Zhai, Jian Yang, Chunhua Shen, Dacheng Tao

Deepfake is a technology dedicated to creating highly realistic facial images and videos under specific conditions, which has significant application potential in fields such as entertainment, movie production, digital human creation, to name a few. With the advancements in deep learning, techniques primarily represented by Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks have achieved impressive generation results. More recently, the emergence of diffusion models with powerful generation capabilities has sparked a renewed wave of research. In addition to deepfake generation, corresponding detection technologies continuously evolve to regulate the potential misuse of deepfakes, such as for privacy invasion and phishing attacks. This survey comprehensively reviews the latest developments in deepfake generation and detection, summarizing and analyzing current state-of-the-arts in this rapidly evolving field. We first unify task definitions, comprehensively introduce datasets and metrics, and discuss developing technologies. Then, we discuss the development of several related sub-fields and focus on researching four representative deepfake fields: face swapping, face reenactment, talking face generation, and facial attribute editing, as well as forgery detection. Subsequently, we comprehensively benchmark representative methods on popular datasets for each field, fully evaluating the latest and influential published works. Finally, we analyze challenges and future research directions of the discussed fields.

Read more

5/17/2024

1M-Deepfakes Detection Challenge
Total Score

0

1M-Deepfakes Detection Challenge

Zhixi Cai, Abhinav Dhall, Shreya Ghosh, Munawar Hayat, Dimitrios Kollias, Kalin Stefanov, Usman Tariq

The detection and localization of deepfake content, particularly when small fake segments are seamlessly mixed with real videos, remains a significant challenge in the field of digital media security. Based on the recently released AV-Deepfake1M dataset, which contains more than 1 million manipulated videos across more than 2,000 subjects, we introduce the 1M-Deepfakes Detection Challenge. This challenge is designed to engage the research community in developing advanced methods for detecting and localizing deepfake manipulations within the large-scale high-realistic audio-visual dataset. The participants can access the AV-Deepfake1M dataset and are required to submit their inference results for evaluation across the metrics for detection or localization tasks. The methodologies developed through the challenge will contribute to the development of next-generation deepfake detection and localization systems. Evaluation scripts, baseline models, and accompanying code will be available on https://github.com/ControlNet/AV-Deepfake1M.

Read more

9/12/2024

DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detection
Total Score

0

DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detection

Zhiyuan Yan, Taiping Yao, Shen Chen, Yandan Zhao, Xinghe Fu, Junwei Zhu, Donghao Luo, Li Yuan, Chengjie Wang, Shouhong Ding, Yunsheng Wu

We propose a new comprehensive benchmark to revolutionize the current deepfake detection field to the next generation. Predominantly, existing works identify top-notch detection algorithms and models by adhering to the common practice: training detectors on one specific dataset (e.g., FF++) and testing them on other prevalent deepfake datasets. This protocol is often regarded as a golden compass for navigating SoTA detectors. But can these stand-out winners be truly applied to tackle the myriad of realistic and diverse deepfakes lurking in the real world? If not, what underlying factors contribute to this gap? In this work, we found the dataset (both train and test) can be the primary culprit due to: (1) forgery diversity: Deepfake techniques are commonly referred to as both face forgery (face-swapping and face-reenactment) and entire image synthesis (AIGC). Most existing datasets only contain partial types, with limited forgery methods implemented; (2) forgery realism: The dominant training dataset, FF++, contains old forgery techniques from the past five years. Honing skills on these forgeries makes it difficult to guarantee effective detection of nowadays' SoTA deepfakes; (3) evaluation protocol: Most detection works perform evaluations on one type, e.g., train and test on face-swapping only, which hinders the development of universal deepfake detectors. To address this dilemma, we construct a highly diverse and large-scale deepfake dataset called DF40, which comprises 40 distinct deepfake techniques. We then conduct comprehensive evaluations using 4 standard evaluation protocols and 7 representative detectors, resulting in over 2,000 evaluations. Through these evaluations, we analyze from various perspectives, leading to 12 new insightful findings contributing to the field. We also open up 5 valuable yet previously underexplored research questions to inspire future works.

Read more

6/21/2024