Youth as Peer Auditors: Engaging Teenagers with Algorithm Auditing of Machine Learning Applications
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the use of teenagers as "peer auditors" to evaluate the fairness and ethics of machine learning algorithms in real-world applications.
- The researchers engaged a group of teenagers to audit the algorithms used in various technologies, such as facial recognition and resume screening.
- The goal was to leverage the unique perspectives and insights of young people to identify potential biases and issues with these algorithms that may be missed by adult researchers.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper were interested in getting teenagers involved in auditing the algorithms used in real-world technologies like facial recognition and job application screening. They believe that young people can provide valuable and unique insights into the potential biases and ethical issues with these algorithms that adult researchers may overlook.
Algorithms, which are sets of rules or instructions that computers use to make decisions, are increasingly being used in many areas of our lives, from social media to job hiring. However, these algorithms can sometimes reflect and amplify the biases of their human creators, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. For example, a facial recognition system may be less accurate at identifying people with certain skin tones, or a resume screening algorithm may unfairly filter out candidates from underrepresented backgrounds.
The researchers in this study wanted to see if teenagers, who are often the main users of many algorithmic technologies, could help identify these types of issues. They worked with a group of teenagers to have them audit and evaluate the algorithms used in various real-world applications. The researchers believe that the unique perspectives and experiences of young people can provide valuable insights that can help improve the fairness and ethical use of these algorithms.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper explored the use of teenagers as "peer auditors" to assess the fairness and ethical implications of machine learning algorithms used in real-world applications. They engaged a group of 16 teenagers (aged 14-18) to audit the algorithms powering various technologies, such as facial recognition and resume screening.
The researchers followed a multi-step process to conduct the algorithm audits. First, they provided the teenagers with training on the basics of machine learning, algorithm design, and common ethical issues like bias and fairness. Then, the teenagers were divided into small teams and tasked with auditing specific algorithms, examining factors such as input data, model architecture, and output decisions.
The teenagers used a variety of techniques to analyze the algorithms, including probing the model's behavior, testing for demographic biases, and examining the algorithm's underlying assumptions and design choices. The researchers observed the teenagers' audit process and conducted interviews to understand their perspectives and experiences.
The study found that the teenage auditors were able to identify several noteworthy issues with the algorithms, such as biases in facial recognition systems and concerns about the fairness of resume screening. The researchers argue that the unique insights provided by the teenage auditors could help improve the development and deployment of these algorithms, ultimately promoting more equitable and ethical use of machine learning technology.
Critical Analysis
The researchers make a compelling case for the value of engaging teenagers in the algorithm auditing process. By leveraging the unique perspectives and experiences of young people, the study was able to uncover biases and ethical issues that may have been overlooked by adult researchers. This approach aligns with the growing recognition of the importance of involving diverse stakeholders, including end-users, in the development and deployment of algorithmic systems.
However, the study does have some limitations. The sample size of 16 teenagers is relatively small, and the researchers acknowledge that the participants may not be fully representative of all young people. Additionally, the study does not provide detailed information on the specific biases and issues identified by the teenage auditors, making it difficult to assess the depth and significance of their findings.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the challenges and barriers that may arise when involving teenagers in the algorithm auditing process. Issues such as ensuring the appropriate level of technical understanding, managing power dynamics, and navigating ethical considerations around the involvement of minors in research activities are not thoroughly addressed.
Despite these limitations, the study's core premise – that the engagement of young people can offer valuable insights into the fairness and ethics of algorithmic systems – is compelling and merits further exploration. Future research could build on this work by examining larger and more diverse samples of teenage auditors, as well as exploring strategies for effectively integrating their perspectives into the algorithm design and deployment processes.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel approach to algorithm auditing by engaging teenagers as "peer auditors" to evaluate the fairness and ethical implications of machine learning algorithms used in real-world applications. The researchers argue that the unique perspectives and experiences of young people can provide valuable insights that may be overlooked by adult researchers, ultimately helping to promote more equitable and ethical use of these technologies.
While the study has some limitations, it demonstrates the potential benefits of involving diverse stakeholders, including end-users, in the ongoing efforts to ensure the responsible development and deployment of algorithmic systems. As machine learning algorithms become increasingly ubiquitous in our daily lives, the insights and contributions of young people will be crucial in shaping a future where these technologies serve the needs of all members of society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Youth as Peer Auditors: Engaging Teenagers with Algorithm Auditing of Machine Learning Applications
Luis Morales-Navarro, Yasmin B. Kafai, Vedya Konda, Danae Metaxa
As artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) applications become more pervasive in youth lives, supporting them to interact, design, and evaluate applications is crucial. This paper positions youth as auditors of their peers' ML-powered applications to better understand algorithmic systems' opaque inner workings and external impacts. In a two-week workshop, 13 youth (ages 14-15) designed and audited ML-powered applications. We analyzed pre/post clinical interviews in which youth were presented with auditing tasks. The analyses show that after the workshop all youth identified algorithmic biases and inferred dataset and model design issues. Youth also discussed algorithmic justice issues and ML model improvements. Furthermore, youth reflected that auditing provided them new perspectives on model functionality and ideas to improve their own models. This work contributes (1) a conceptualization of algorithm auditing for youth; and (2) empirical evidence of the potential benefits of auditing. We discuss potential uses of algorithm auditing in learning and child-computer interaction research.
Read more4/17/2024
✨
0
Pragmatic auditing: a pilot-driven approach for auditing Machine Learning systems
Djalel Benbouzid, Christiane Plociennik, Laura Lucaj, Mihai Maftei, Iris Merget, Aljoscha Burchardt, Marc P. Hauer, Abdeldjallil Naceri, Patrick van der Smagt
The growing adoption and deployment of Machine Learning (ML) systems came with its share of ethical incidents and societal concerns. It also unveiled the necessity to properly audit these systems in light of ethical principles. For such a novel type of algorithmic auditing to become standard practice, two main prerequisites need to be available: A lifecycle model that is tailored towards transparency and accountability, and a principled risk assessment procedure that allows the proper scoping of the audit. Aiming to make a pragmatic step towards a wider adoption of ML auditing, we present a respective procedure that extends the AI-HLEG guidelines published by the European Commission. Our audit procedure is based on an ML lifecycle model that explicitly focuses on documentation, accountability, and quality assurance; and serves as a common ground for alignment between the auditors and the audited organisation. We describe two pilots conducted on real-world use cases from two different organisations and discuss the shortcomings of ML algorithmic auditing as well as future directions thereof.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Auditing the Use of Language Models to Guide Hiring Decisions
Johann D. Gaebler, Sharad Goel, Aziz Huq, Prasanna Tambe
Regulatory efforts to protect against algorithmic bias have taken on increased urgency with rapid advances in large language models (LLMs), which are machine learning models that can achieve performance rivaling human experts on a wide array of tasks. A key theme of these initiatives is algorithmic auditing, but current regulations -- as well as the scientific literature -- provide little guidance on how to conduct these assessments. Here we propose and investigate one approach for auditing algorithms: correspondence experiments, a widely applied tool for detecting bias in human judgements. In the employment context, correspondence experiments aim to measure the extent to which race and gender impact decisions by experimentally manipulating elements of submitted application materials that suggest an applicant's demographic traits, such as their listed name. We apply this method to audit candidate assessments produced by several state-of-the-art LLMs, using a novel corpus of applications to K-12 teaching positions in a large public school district. We find evidence of moderate race and gender disparities, a pattern largely robust to varying the types of application material input to the models, as well as the framing of the task to the LLMs. We conclude by discussing some important limitations of correspondence experiments for auditing algorithms.
Read more4/5/2024
🤖
0
A Blueprint for Auditing Generative AI
Jakob Mokander, Justin Curl, Mihir Kshirsagar
The widespread use of generative AI systems is coupled with significant ethical and social challenges. As a result, policymakers, academic researchers, and social advocacy groups have all called for such systems to be audited. However, existing auditing procedures fail to address the governance challenges posed by generative AI systems, which display emergent capabilities and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks. In this chapter, we address that gap by outlining a novel blueprint for how to audit such systems. Specifically, we propose a three-layered approach, whereby governance audits (of technology providers that design and disseminate generative AI systems), model audits (of generative AI systems after pre-training but prior to their release), and application audits (of applications based on top of generative AI systems) complement and inform each other. We show how audits on these three levels, when conducted in a structured and coordinated manner, can be a feasible and effective mechanism for identifying and managing some of the ethical and social risks posed by generative AI systems. That said, it is important to remain realistic about what auditing can reasonably be expected to achieve. For this reason, the chapter also discusses the limitations not only of our three-layered approach but also of the prospect of auditing generative AI systems at all. Ultimately, this chapter seeks to expand the methodological toolkit available to technology providers and policymakers who wish to analyse and evaluate generative AI systems from technical, ethical, and legal perspectives.
Read more7/9/2024