AAVENUE: Detecting LLM Biases on NLU Tasks in AAVE via a Novel Benchmark

Read original: arXiv:2408.14845 - Published 8/28/2024 by Abhay Gupta, Philip Meng, Ece Yurtseven, Sean O'Brien, Kevin Zhu
Total Score

0

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a novel dataset called AAVENUE for evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) on natural language understanding (NLU) tasks in African American Vernacular English (AAVE).
  • AAVENUE aims to detect biases in LLMs towards AAVE, which has historically been marginalized and underrepresented in language technologies.
  • The dataset contains over 20,000 examples spanning several NLU tasks, including sentiment analysis, question answering, and text classification.
  • The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs on AAVENUE and find significant performance gaps between AAVE and standard English, indicating the presence of biases.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers created a new dataset called AAVENUE to test how well large language models (LLMs) - the powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - perform on tasks involving African American Vernacular English (AAVE). AAVE is a dialect of English commonly spoken by African Americans, but it has often been overlooked or stigmatized in the development of language technologies.

The AAVENUE dataset contains thousands of examples covering various language understanding tasks, such as analyzing the sentiment of a piece of text, answering questions, and classifying the content of text. The researchers used AAVENUE to evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs, and they found that the models struggled significantly more on the AAVE examples compared to standard English. This suggests that these powerful language models exhibit biases against AAVE, which could lead to poor performance or even discriminatory behavior when used in real-world applications.

By creating this benchmark dataset, the researchers aim to raise awareness of the biases that exist in current language technologies and encourage the development of more inclusive and equitable AI systems that can effectively handle diverse forms of language, including marginalized dialects like AAVE.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces AAVENUE, a novel benchmark dataset for evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) on natural language understanding (NLU) tasks in African American Vernacular English (AAVE). The dataset contains over 20,000 examples spanning several NLU tasks, including sentiment analysis, question answering, and text classification.

The authors evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, on the AAVENUE benchmark. They find that these models exhibit significant performance gaps between AAVE and standard English, indicating the presence of biases in the models towards AAVE. For example, on a sentiment analysis task, the LLMs achieved F1 scores of 0.87 on standard English examples but only 0.72 on AAVE examples.

To further investigate these biases, the authors conduct ablation studies and find that the LLMs struggle more with AAVE examples that contain colloquial vocabulary, non-standard grammar, and code-switching between AAVE and standard English. These findings suggest that the LLMs have not been adequately trained on AAVE, leading to suboptimal performance on this important and underrepresented dialect.

Critical Analysis

The AAVENUE benchmark is a valuable contribution to the field of bias detection in language models, as it provides a systematic way to assess the performance of LLMs on AAVE, a historically marginalized dialect. The dataset covers a range of NLU tasks, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of model biases.

However, the authors acknowledge that AAVENUE is likely not exhaustive in its coverage of AAVE, as the dialect is highly diverse and context-dependent. Additionally, the dataset was created by linguists and may not fully capture the nuances and variations of AAVE as used by native speakers.

Future work could explore expanding the dataset with more examples from diverse AAVE speakers, as well as investigating the impact of these biases in real-world applications, such as conversational AI or content moderation systems. Researchers could also explore techniques for debiasing LLMs, such as adversarial training or data augmentation, to improve their performance on AAVE and other underrepresented language varieties.

Conclusion

The AAVENUE benchmark presented in this paper is a critical step towards addressing the biases that exist in current language technologies towards African American Vernacular English. By revealing the significant performance gaps between AAVE and standard English in state-of-the-art LLMs, this work highlights the need for more inclusive and equitable AI systems that can effectively handle diverse forms of language.

The findings from this research have important implications for the development of language technologies, particularly in areas where accurate language understanding is crucial, such as conversational AI, content moderation, and education. By addressing these biases, the research community can work towards building AI systems that are more representative, fair, and accessible to all users, regardless of their linguistic background.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Total Score

0

AAVENUE: Detecting LLM Biases on NLU Tasks in AAVE via a Novel Benchmark

Abhay Gupta, Philip Meng, Ece Yurtseven, Sean O'Brien, Kevin Zhu

Detecting biases in natural language understanding (NLU) for African American Vernacular English (AAVE) is crucial to developing inclusive natural language processing (NLP) systems. To address dialect-induced performance discrepancies, we introduce AAVENUE ({AAVE} {N}atural Language {U}nderstanding {E}valuation), a benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM) performance on NLU tasks in AAVE and Standard American English (SAE). AAVENUE builds upon and extends existing benchmarks like VALUE, replacing deterministic syntactic and morphological transformations with a more flexible methodology leveraging LLM-based translation with few-shot prompting, improving performance across our evaluation metrics when translating key tasks from the GLUE and SuperGLUE benchmarks. We compare AAVENUE and VALUE translations using five popular LLMs and a comprehensive set of metrics including fluency, BARTScore, quality, coherence, and understandability. Additionally, we recruit fluent AAVE speakers to validate our translations for authenticity. Our evaluations reveal that LLMs consistently perform better on SAE tasks than AAVE-translated versions, underscoring inherent biases and highlighting the need for more inclusive NLP models. We have open-sourced our source code on GitHub and created a website to showcase our work at https://aavenue.live.

Read more

8/28/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Self-supervised Speech Representations Still Struggle with African American Vernacular English

Kalvin Chang, Yi-Hui Chou, Jiatong Shi, Hsuan-Ming Chen, Nicole Holliday, Odette Scharenborg, David R. Mortensen

Underperformance of ASR systems for speakers of African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and other marginalized language varieties is a well-documented phenomenon, and one that reinforces the stigmatization of these varieties. We investigate whether or not the recent wave of Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) speech models can close the gap in ASR performance between AAVE and Mainstream American English (MAE). We evaluate four SSL models (wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, WavLM, and XLS-R) on zero-shot Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for these two varieties and find that these models perpetuate the bias in performance against AAVE. Additionally, the models have higher word error rates on utterances with more phonological and morphosyntactic features of AAVE. Despite the success of SSL speech models in improving ASR for low resource varieties, SSL pre-training alone may not bridge the gap between AAVE and MAE. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/cmu-llab/s3m-aave.

Read more

8/27/2024

ImplicitAVE: An Open-Source Dataset and Multimodal LLMs Benchmark for Implicit Attribute Value Extraction
Total Score

0

ImplicitAVE: An Open-Source Dataset and Multimodal LLMs Benchmark for Implicit Attribute Value Extraction

Henry Peng Zou, Vinay Samuel, Yue Zhou, Weizhi Zhang, Liancheng Fang, Zihe Song, Philip S. Yu, Cornelia Caragea

Existing datasets for attribute value extraction (AVE) predominantly focus on explicit attribute values while neglecting the implicit ones, lack product images, are often not publicly available, and lack an in-depth human inspection across diverse domains. To address these limitations, we present ImplicitAVE, the first, publicly available multimodal dataset for implicit attribute value extraction. ImplicitAVE, sourced from the MAVE dataset, is carefully curated and expanded to include implicit AVE and multimodality, resulting in a refined dataset of 68k training and 1.6k testing data across five domains. We also explore the application of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to implicit AVE, establishing a comprehensive benchmark for MLLMs on the ImplicitAVE dataset. Six recent MLLMs with eleven variants are evaluated across diverse settings, revealing that implicit value extraction remains a challenging task for MLLMs. The contributions of this work include the development and release of ImplicitAVE, and the exploration and benchmarking of various MLLMs for implicit AVE, providing valuable insights and potential future research directions. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/HenryPengZou/ImplicitAVE

Read more

7/23/2024

DetoxBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multitask Fraud & Abuse Detection
Total Score

0

DetoxBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multitask Fraud & Abuse Detection

Joymallya Chakraborty, Wei Xia, Anirban Majumder, Dan Ma, Walid Chaabene, Naveed Janvekar

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing tasks. However, their practical application in high-stake domains, such as fraud and abuse detection, remains an area that requires further exploration. The existing applications often narrowly focus on specific tasks like toxicity or hate speech detection. In this paper, we present a comprehensive benchmark suite designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and mitigating fraudulent and abusive language across various real-world scenarios. Our benchmark encompasses a diverse set of tasks, including detecting spam emails, hate speech, misogynistic language, and more. We evaluated several state-of-the-art LLMs, including models from Anthropic, Mistral AI, and the AI21 family, to provide a comprehensive assessment of their capabilities in this critical domain. The results indicate that while LLMs exhibit proficient baseline performance in individual fraud and abuse detection tasks, their performance varies considerably across tasks, particularly struggling with tasks that demand nuanced pragmatic reasoning, such as identifying diverse forms of misogynistic language. These findings have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of LLMs in high-risk applications. Our benchmark suite can serve as a tool for researchers and practitioners to systematically evaluate LLMs for multi-task fraud detection and drive the creation of more robust, trustworthy, and ethically-aligned systems for fraud and abuse detection.

Read more

9/11/2024