Self-supervised Speech Representations Still Struggle with African American Vernacular English

Overview

• The paper investigates whether recent self-supervised learning (SSL) speech models can improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance for African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and reduce the bias against this marginalized language variety.
• The researchers evaluate four SSL models (wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, WavLM, and XLS-R) on zero-shot ASR for AAVE and Mainstream American English (MAE).
• The results show that the SSL models perpetuate the bias in performance against AAVE, with higher word error rates on utterances with more AAVE features.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines whether the latest self-supervised learning (SSL) speech recognition models can help reduce the long-standing problem of underperformance for African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and other marginalized language varieties. This is important because the poor performance of speech recognition systems on AAVE reinforces the stigmatization of this language variety.

The researchers tested four of the most advanced SSL speech models - wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, WavLM, and XLS-R - on automatic speech recognition (ASR) for both AAVE and Mainstream American English (MAE). They found that these models still performed worse on AAVE, with higher word error rates for utterances containing more AAVE-specific features like pronunciations and grammar.

Despite the success of SSL models in improving ASR for low-resource languages, the researchers conclude that self-supervised pretraining alone may not be enough to bridge the gap between AAVE and MAE performance. More work is needed to address the systemic biases in speech recognition technology.

Technical Explanation

The paper evaluates the performance of four state-of-the-art self-supervised learning (SSL) speech models - wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, WavLM, and XLS-R - on zero-shot automatic speech recognition (ASR) for African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and Mainstream American English (MAE).

The researchers first fine-tuned each SSL model on a large English ASR dataset. They then evaluated the models' performance on AAVE and MAE test sets, measuring word error rates (WER) as the primary metric. Additionally, they analyzed the relationship between WER and the presence of AAVE-specific phonological and morphosyntactic features in the utterances.

The results show that the SSL models perpetuate the bias in ASR performance against AAVE, with significantly higher WERs compared to MAE. Furthermore, the models exhibit higher WERs on utterances with more AAVE features, indicating that the SSL pre-training has not effectively captured the linguistic diversity of AAVE.

Despite the success of SSL models in improving ASR for low-resource languages, the researchers conclude that self-supervised pretraining alone may not be sufficient to bridge the performance gap between AAVE and MAE. Addressing the systemic biases in speech recognition technology will likely require more targeted approaches, such as incorporating AAVE-specific data and linguistic knowledge into the model training process.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the limitations of current SSL speech models in addressing the long-standing problem of racial disparities in automatic speech recognition. The researchers' rigorous evaluation of four state-of-the-art SSL models on AAVE and MAE data helps to quantify the extent of the bias and highlights the need for more robust solutions.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on a single metric, word error rate, to assess model performance. While WER is a standard metric in ASR, it may not capture all the nuances of how the models handle AAVE-specific linguistic features. Incorporating additional evaluation measures, such as phoneme-level accuracy or perplexity, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the models' strengths and weaknesses.

Furthermore, the paper does not delve into the potential reasons why the SSL models fail to bridge the performance gap between AAVE and MAE. Exploring the specific linguistic and acoustic characteristics that the models struggle to capture, as well as the role of dataset biases, could inform the development of more effective solutions.

Despite these limitations, the paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the persistent challenges in achieving equitable speech recognition performance across language varieties. The findings underscore the need for a multifaceted approach that combines technological advancements with a deeper understanding of language variation and social context.

Conclusion

This paper investigates whether recent self-supervised learning (SSL) speech models can improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance for African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and reduce the long-standing bias against this marginalized language variety. The researchers evaluate four SSL models - wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, WavLM, and XLS-R - on zero-shot ASR for AAVE and Mainstream American English (MAE).

The results show that the SSL models perpetuate the bias in performance against AAVE, with higher word error rates on utterances containing more AAVE-specific phonological and morphosyntactic features. This finding suggests that self-supervised pretraining alone may not be sufficient to bridge the gap between AAVE and MAE ASR performance.

The paper highlights the persistent challenges in achieving equitable speech recognition across language varieties and underscores the need for a more holistic approach that combines technological advancements with a deeper understanding of language variation and social context. Addressing the systemic biases in speech recognition will require concerted efforts to incorporate AAVE-specific data and linguistic knowledge into the model training process.