Abide by the Law and Follow the Flow: Conservation Laws for Gradient Flows

Read original: arXiv:2307.00144 - Published 7/11/2024 by Sibylle Marcotte, R'emi Gribonval, Gabriel Peyr'e
Total Score

2

👁️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores conservation laws for gradient flows, which are a class of optimization algorithms used in machine learning and related fields.
  • It examines how certain conservation laws, such as conservation of momentum, can be maintained in gradient flows that go beyond the standard Euclidean setting.
  • The research aims to provide a better understanding of the underlying dynamics of gradient-based optimization methods and their properties.

Plain English Explanation

Gradient flows are a type of algorithm used in machine learning and optimization problems to find the best solutions. These algorithms work by repeatedly adjusting the values of the parameters in a model to minimize an error or loss function.

The paper explores how certain fundamental principles, known as conservation laws, can be maintained in gradient flows. Conservation laws describe how certain quantities, like momentum, are preserved as the algorithm progresses.

Traditionally, gradient flows have been studied in the context of Euclidean spaces, where the concepts of distance and direction are straightforward. However, many real-world problems involve more complex mathematical structures, where the usual notions of distance and direction may not apply.

The researchers investigate how conservation laws, such as conservation of momentum, can be extended to these more general settings. By understanding how these laws are upheld, the researchers aim to gain deeper insights into the dynamics and behavior of gradient-based optimization methods.

This knowledge could lead to the development of more robust and efficient optimization algorithms, which are crucial for advancing machine learning and other fields that rely on gradient-based techniques. It may also provide a better understanding of the convergence properties of these algorithms and how they can be improved.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the conservation laws that govern gradient flows, which are a class of optimization algorithms used in machine learning and related fields. Gradient flows work by repeatedly adjusting the parameters of a model to minimize a loss or error function.

The researchers focus on extending the concept of conservation laws, such as conservation of momentum, to gradient flows that operate in more general mathematical spaces beyond the standard Euclidean setting. In Euclidean spaces, the notions of distance and direction are well-defined, but many real-world problems involve more complex structures where these concepts may not be straightforward.

By understanding how conservation laws are maintained in these more general settings, the researchers aim to gain deeper insights into the underlying dynamics and behavior of gradient-based optimization methods. This knowledge could lead to the development of more robust and efficient optimization algorithms, which are crucial for advancing machine learning and other fields that rely on gradient-based techniques.

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical framework for analyzing the conservation laws in gradient flows and demonstrates how these laws can be extended to non-Euclidean settings. The researchers explore various examples and case studies to illustrate the practical implications of their findings.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and theoretically sound analysis of conservation laws for gradient flows. The researchers have successfully extended the concept of conservation laws to more general mathematical settings, which is a significant contribution to the field.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on the mathematical and theoretical aspects of the problem, without extensive empirical validation or practical applications. While the theoretical insights are valuable, it would be helpful to see how these findings translate to real-world optimization problems and their impact on the performance of gradient-based algorithms.

Additionally, the paper does not address the computational complexity or scalability of the proposed approaches. As the complexity of optimization problems continues to grow, it will be important to consider the practical feasibility and efficiency of the conservation law-based methods, especially when dealing with large-scale datasets or high-dimensional optimization problems.

Further research could explore the implications of these conservation laws for the convergence properties of gradient-based optimization algorithms, as well as their potential applications in areas like neural operators and adversarial attacks. Investigating the scaling laws associated with these conservation laws could also provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

The paper explores the conservation laws that govern gradient flows, which are a widely used class of optimization algorithms in machine learning and related fields. The researchers have successfully extended the concept of conservation laws, such as conservation of momentum, to gradient flows that operate in more general mathematical spaces beyond the standard Euclidean setting.

By understanding how these conservation laws are maintained in these more complex settings, the researchers aim to gain deeper insights into the underlying dynamics and behavior of gradient-based optimization methods. This knowledge could lead to the development of more robust and efficient optimization algorithms, which are crucial for advancing machine learning and other fields that rely on gradient-based techniques.

While the paper provides a strong theoretical foundation, further research is needed to explore the practical implications and scalability of the proposed approaches, as well as their potential applications in areas like neural operators, adversarial attacks, and convergence properties of deep learning models. Overall, this research represents an important step towards a better understanding of the fundamental principles governing gradient-based optimization.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👁️

Total Score

2

Abide by the Law and Follow the Flow: Conservation Laws for Gradient Flows

Sibylle Marcotte, R'emi Gribonval, Gabriel Peyr'e

Understanding the geometric properties of gradient descent dynamics is a key ingredient in deciphering the recent success of very large machine learning models. A striking observation is that trained over-parameterized models retain some properties of the optimization initialization. This implicit bias is believed to be responsible for some favorable properties of the trained models and could explain their good generalization properties. The purpose of this article is threefold. First, we rigorously expose the definition and basic properties of conservation laws, that define quantities conserved during gradient flows of a given model (e.g. of a ReLU network with a given architecture) with any training data and any loss. Then we explain how to find the maximal number of independent conservation laws by performing finite-dimensional algebraic manipulations on the Lie algebra generated by the Jacobian of the model. Finally, we provide algorithms to: a) compute a family of polynomial laws; b) compute the maximal number of (not necessarily polynomial) independent conservation laws. We provide showcase examples that we fully work out theoretically. Besides, applying the two algorithms confirms for a number of ReLU network architectures that all known laws are recovered by the algorithm, and that there are no other independent laws. Such computational tools pave the way to understanding desirable properties of optimization initialization in large machine learning models.

Read more

7/11/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Keep the Momentum: Conservation Laws beyond Euclidean Gradient Flows

Sibylle Marcotte, R'emi Gribonval, Gabriel Peyr'e

Conservation laws are well-established in the context of Euclidean gradient flow dynamics, notably for linear or ReLU neural network training. Yet, their existence and principles for non-Euclidean geometries and momentum-based dynamics remain largely unknown. In this paper, we characterize all conservation laws in this general setting. In stark contrast to the case of gradient flows, we prove that the conservation laws for momentum-based dynamics exhibit temporal dependence. Additionally, we often observe a conservation loss when transitioning from gradient flow to momentum dynamics. Specifically, for linear networks, our framework allows us to identify all momentum conservation laws, which are less numerous than in the gradient flow case except in sufficiently over-parameterized regimes. With ReLU networks, no conservation law remains. This phenomenon also manifests in non-Euclidean metrics, used e.g. for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF): all conservation laws can be determined in the gradient flow context, yet none persists in the momentum case.

Read more

5/22/2024

Harnessing the Power of Neural Operators with Automatically Encoded Conservation Laws
Total Score

0

Harnessing the Power of Neural Operators with Automatically Encoded Conservation Laws

Ning Liu, Yiming Fan, Xianyi Zeng, Milan Klower, Lu Zhang, Yue Yu

Neural operators (NOs) have emerged as effective tools for modeling complex physical systems in scientific machine learning. In NOs, a central characteristic is to learn the governing physical laws directly from data. In contrast to other machine learning applications, partial knowledge is often known a priori about the physical system at hand whereby quantities such as mass, energy and momentum are exactly conserved. Currently, NOs have to learn these conservation laws from data and can only approximately satisfy them due to finite training data and random noise. In this work, we introduce conservation law-encoded neural operators (clawNOs), a suite of NOs that endow inference with automatic satisfaction of such conservation laws. ClawNOs are built with a divergence-free prediction of the solution field, with which the continuity equation is automatically guaranteed. As a consequence, clawNOs are compliant with the most fundamental and ubiquitous conservation laws essential for correct physical consistency. As demonstrations, we consider a wide variety of scientific applications ranging from constitutive modeling of material deformation, incompressible fluid dynamics, to atmospheric simulation. ClawNOs significantly outperform the state-of-the-art NOs in learning efficacy, especially in small-data regimes.

Read more

6/6/2024

A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws
Total Score

0

A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws

Blake Bordelon, Alexander Atanasov, Cengiz Pehlevan

On a variety of tasks, the performance of neural networks predictably improves with training time, dataset size and model size across many orders of magnitude. This phenomenon is known as a neural scaling law. Of fundamental importance is the compute-optimal scaling law, which reports the performance as a function of units of compute when choosing model sizes optimally. We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. This reproduces many observations about neural scaling laws. First, our model makes a prediction about why the scaling of performance with training time and with model size have different power law exponents. Consequently, the theory predicts an asymmetric compute-optimal scaling rule where the number of training steps are increased faster than model parameters, consistent with recent empirical observations. Second, it has been observed that early in training, networks converge to their infinite-width dynamics at a rate $1/textit{width}$ but at late time exhibit a rate $textit{width}^{-c}$, where $c$ depends on the structure of the architecture and task. We show that our model exhibits this behavior. Lastly, our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.

Read more

6/26/2024