Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning

Read original: arXiv:2410.02618 - Published 10/4/2024 by Massimiliano de Leoni, Alessandro Padella
Total Score

0

Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel approach to achieving fairness in predictive process analytics using adversarial learning.
  • The proposed method aims to debias predictive models and ensure fair outcomes for different demographic groups.
  • Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in improving fairness while maintaining high predictive performance.

Plain English Explanation

When machine learning models are used to make predictions about people, there is a risk that the models may be biased and make unfair decisions. This paper describes a way to address this problem in the context of predictive process analytics, which is the use of machine learning to forecast the outcomes of business processes.

The key idea is to use an adversarial learning approach, where the model is trained to both make accurate predictions and also hide sensitive information about individuals, such as their demographic characteristics. This helps ensure that the model's predictions are not unfairly influenced by these sensitive attributes.

The paper demonstrates this approach on real-world datasets, showing that it can improve the fairness of the predictions while still maintaining high overall predictive performance. This is an important advancement in making machine learning systems more equitable and inclusive.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel adversarial debiasing approach for achieving fairness in predictive process analytics. The key idea is to train a main prediction model alongside an adversarial model that tries to predict sensitive attributes (e.g., demographic characteristics) from the model's hidden representations.

By optimizing the main model to both make accurate predictions and fool the adversarial model, the approach encourages the main model to learn representations that are independent of the sensitive attributes, leading to fairer outcomes.

The authors evaluate their approach on real-world datasets and compare it to other fairness-aware machine learning techniques. The results show that their method achieves significant improvements in fairness metrics while maintaining high predictive performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to address the important issue of algorithmic fairness in predictive process analytics. The adversarial debiasing technique is well-designed and the experimental evaluation is thorough.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed method. For example, it would be useful to understand how the approach might perform on datasets with different types of sensitive attributes or different levels of bias. Additionally, the paper does not address potential trade-offs between fairness and other desirable model properties, such as interpretability or robustness.

Further research could also explore ways to extend the adversarial debiasing approach to other machine learning tasks and domains beyond predictive process analytics.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel adversarial learning-based method for achieving fairness in predictive process analytics. The approach demonstrates promising results in improving fairness while maintaining high predictive performance on real-world datasets.

The work contributes to the growing body of research on fairness-aware machine learning and highlights the importance of addressing algorithmic bias in the deployment of machine learning systems. Further development and evaluation of this technique could lead to more equitable and inclusive predictive analytics applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning
Total Score

0

New!Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning

Massimiliano de Leoni, Alessandro Padella

Predictive business process analytics has become important for organizations, offering real-time operational support for their processes. However, these algorithms often perform unfair predictions because they are based on biased variables (e.g., gender or nationality), namely variables embodying discrimination. This paper addresses the challenge of integrating a debiasing phase into predictive business process analytics to ensure that predictions are not influenced by biased variables. Our framework leverages on adversial debiasing is evaluated on four case studies, showing a significant reduction in the contribution of biased variables to the predicted value. The proposed technique is also compared with the state of the art in fairness in process mining, illustrating that our framework allows for a more enhanced level of fairness, while retaining a better prediction quality.

Read more

10/4/2024

AdapFair: Ensuring Continuous Fairness for Machine Learning Operations
Total Score

0

AdapFair: Ensuring Continuous Fairness for Machine Learning Operations

Yinghui Huang, Zihao Tang, Xiangyu Chang

The biases and discrimination of machine learning algorithms have attracted significant attention, leading to the development of various algorithms tailored to specific contexts. However, these solutions often fall short of addressing fairness issues inherent in machine learning operations. In this paper, we present a debiasing framework designed to find an optimal fair transformation of input data that maximally preserves data predictability. A distinctive feature of our approach is its flexibility and efficiency. It can be integrated with any downstream black-box classifiers, providing continuous fairness guarantees with minimal retraining efforts, even in the face of frequent data drifts, evolving fairness requirements, and batches of similar tasks. To achieve this, we leverage the normalizing flows to enable efficient, information-preserving data transformation, ensuring that no critical information is lost during the debiasing process. Additionally, we incorporate the Wasserstein distance as the unfairness measure to guide the optimization of data transformations. Finally, we introduce an efficient optimization algorithm with closed-formed gradient computations, making our framework scalable and suitable for dynamic, real-world environments.

Read more

9/24/2024

Improving the Fairness of Deep-Learning, Short-term Crime Prediction with Under-reporting-aware Models
Total Score

0

Improving the Fairness of Deep-Learning, Short-term Crime Prediction with Under-reporting-aware Models

Jiahui Wu, Vanessa Frias-Martinez

Deep learning crime predictive tools use past crime data and additional behavioral datasets to forecast future crimes. Nevertheless, these tools have been shown to suffer from unfair predictions across minority racial and ethnic groups. Current approaches to address this unfairness generally propose either pre-processing methods that mitigate the bias in the training datasets by applying corrections to crime counts based on domain knowledge or in-processing methods that are implemented as fairness regularizers to optimize for both accuracy and fairness. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning architecture that combines the power of these two approaches to increase prediction fairness. Our results show that the proposed model improves the fairness of crime predictions when compared to models with in-processing de-biasing approaches and with models without any type of bias correction, albeit at the cost of reducing accuracy.

Read more

6/14/2024

Post-processing fairness with minimal changes
Total Score

0

Post-processing fairness with minimal changes

Federico Di Gennaro, Thibault Laugel, Vincent Grari, Xavier Renard, Marcin Detyniecki

In this paper, we introduce a novel post-processing algorithm that is both model-agnostic and does not require the sensitive attribute at test time. In addition, our algorithm is explicitly designed to enforce minimal changes between biased and debiased predictions; a property that, while highly desirable, is rarely prioritized as an explicit objective in fairness literature. Our approach leverages a multiplicative factor applied to the logit value of probability scores produced by a black-box classifier. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method through empirical evaluations, comparing its performance against other four debiasing algorithms on two widely used datasets in fairness research.

Read more

8/30/2024