Post-processing fairness with minimal changes

Read original: arXiv:2408.15096 - Published 8/30/2024 by Federico Di Gennaro, Thibault Laugel, Vincent Grari, Xavier Renard, Marcin Detyniecki
Total Score

0

Post-processing fairness with minimal changes

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a method for post-processing machine learning models to achieve fairness with minimal changes to the original model.
  • The approach aims to improve fairness metrics like demographic parity and equal opportunity while preserving the model's accuracy as much as possible.
  • The method involves a constrained optimization problem that can be efficiently solved using standard optimization techniques.

Plain English Explanation

In the world of machine learning, there is a growing concern about the fairness of automated decision-making systems. Often, these models can unintentionally discriminate against certain groups or individuals based on characteristics like race, gender, or socioeconomic status.

The researchers in this paper have developed a new technique to address this problem. Their approach is to take an existing machine learning model and "post-process" it to make it more fair, without significantly changing the model's overall performance.

The key idea is to formulate the fairness problem as an optimization problem, where the goal is to adjust the model's outputs in a way that improves fairness metrics (like making sure the model's decisions have the same error rates for different demographic groups) while preserving as much of the original model's accuracy as possible.

This optimization problem can be efficiently solved using standard techniques, allowing the researchers to "retrofit" fairness onto pre-existing models in a straightforward way. The result is a fair model that performs almost as well as the original unfair one, giving the best of both worlds.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a post-processing approach to improving the fairness of machine learning models. The key idea is to formulate the fairness optimization as a constrained optimization problem, where the goal is to modify the model's outputs to improve fairness metrics like demographic parity and equal opportunity, while preserving as much of the original model's accuracy as possible.

Specifically, the authors propose solving the following optimization problem:

minimize: (Original model's loss) + λ * (Fairness loss)
subject to: (Fairness constraints)

Here, the "fairness loss" term encourages the post-processed model to be more fair, while the constraints ensure that the fairness metrics are improved. The parameter λ controls the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness.

The authors show that this optimization problem can be efficiently solved using standard techniques like quadratic programming. This allows them to "retrofit" fairness onto pre-existing models in a straightforward way, without having to retrain the entire model from scratch.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on several real-world datasets, showing that it can significantly improve fairness metrics while preserving most of the original model's accuracy.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the fairness of machine learning models through post-processing. The key strengths are its simplicity, efficiency, and the ability to leverage pre-existing models.

One potential limitation is that the method assumes the original model is already reasonably accurate. If the base model has very poor performance, the post-processing approach may not be able to salvage it. Additionally, the paper does not explore how the choice of fairness metric or the tradeoff parameter λ might affect the results.

It would also be interesting to see how this approach compares to other fairness-aware training techniques, where the model is built to be fair from the ground up. Differentially Private Post-processing for Fair Regression and FRAPPE: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-processing Everything are two related papers that could provide useful points of comparison.

Overall, the paper presents a practical and efficient solution for improving the fairness of machine learning models, and it could have important implications for deploying fair AI systems in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a post-processing approach to enhancing the fairness of machine learning models. By formulating the fairness optimization as a constrained problem, the method can efficiently improve metrics like demographic parity and equal opportunity while preserving much of the original model's accuracy.

The key strengths of this approach are its simplicity, efficiency, and ability to leverage pre-existing models. While there are some limitations and open questions, the paper presents an important contribution to the growing field of fair and ethical AI.

As machine learning systems become more prevalent in high-stakes decision making, developing techniques to ensure fair and unbiased outcomes will be crucial. This work represents a step in that direction, and it could have significant implications for deploying fair and responsible AI in the real world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Post-processing fairness with minimal changes
Total Score

0

Post-processing fairness with minimal changes

Federico Di Gennaro, Thibault Laugel, Vincent Grari, Xavier Renard, Marcin Detyniecki

In this paper, we introduce a novel post-processing algorithm that is both model-agnostic and does not require the sensitive attribute at test time. In addition, our algorithm is explicitly designed to enforce minimal changes between biased and debiased predictions; a property that, while highly desirable, is rarely prioritized as an explicit objective in fairness literature. Our approach leverages a multiplicative factor applied to the logit value of probability scores produced by a black-box classifier. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method through empirical evaluations, comparing its performance against other four debiasing algorithms on two widely used datasets in fairness research.

Read more

8/30/2024

Multi-Output Distributional Fairness via Post-Processing
Total Score

0

Multi-Output Distributional Fairness via Post-Processing

Gang Li, Qihang Lin, Ayush Ghosh, Tianbao Yang

The post-processing approaches are becoming prominent techniques to enhance machine learning models' fairness because of their intuitiveness, low computational cost, and excellent scalability. However, most existing post-processing methods are designed for task-specific fairness measures and are limited to single-output models. In this paper, we introduce a post-processing method for multi-output models, such as the ones used for multi-task/multi-class classification and representation learning, to enhance a model's distributional parity, a task-agnostic fairness measure. Existing techniques to achieve distributional parity are based on the (inverse) cumulative density function of a model's output, which is limited to single-output models. Extending previous works, our method employs an optimal transport mapping to move a model's outputs across different groups towards their empirical Wasserstein barycenter. An approximation technique is applied to reduce the complexity of computing the exact barycenter and a kernel regression method is proposed for extending this process to out-of-sample data. Our empirical studies, which compare our method to current existing post-processing baselines on multi-task/multi-class classification and representation learning tasks, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Read more

9/4/2024

Optimal Group Fair Classifiers from Linear Post-Processing
Total Score

0

Optimal Group Fair Classifiers from Linear Post-Processing

Ruicheng Xian, Han Zhao

We propose a post-processing algorithm for fair classification that mitigates model bias under a unified family of group fairness criteria covering statistical parity, equal opportunity, and equalized odds, applicable to multi-class problems and both attribute-aware and attribute-blind settings. It achieves fairness by re-calibrating the output score of the given base model with a fairness cost -- a linear combination of the (predicted) group memberships. Our algorithm is based on a representation result showing that the optimal fair classifier can be expressed as a linear post-processing of the loss function and the group predictor, derived via using these as sufficient statistics to reformulate the fair classification problem as a linear program. The parameters of the post-processor are estimated by solving the empirical LP. Experiments on benchmark datasets show the efficiency and effectiveness of our algorithm at reducing disparity compared to existing algorithms, including in-processing, especially on larger problems.

Read more

5/8/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression

Ruicheng Xian, Qiaobo Li, Gautam Kamath, Han Zhao

This paper describes a differentially private post-processing algorithm for learning fair regressors satisfying statistical parity, addressing privacy concerns of machine learning models trained on sensitive data, as well as fairness concerns of their potential to propagate historical biases. Our algorithm can be applied to post-process any given regressor to improve fairness by remapping its outputs. It consists of three steps: first, the output distributions are estimated privately via histogram density estimation and the Laplace mechanism, then their Wasserstein barycenter is computed, and the optimal transports to the barycenter are used for post-processing to satisfy fairness. We analyze the sample complexity of our algorithm and provide fairness guarantee, revealing a trade-off between the statistical bias and variance induced from the choice of the number of bins in the histogram, in which using less bins always favors fairness at the expense of error.

Read more

5/8/2024