AdapFair: Ensuring Continuous Fairness for Machine Learning Operations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper "AdapFair: Ensuring Continuous Fairness for Machine Learning Operations" proposes a framework to address fairness issues in machine learning (ML) systems.
- It focuses on the challenge of maintaining fairness as ML models are updated and deployed in real-world scenarios.
- The approach leverages optimal transport theory to continuously adapt the model and data distributions, ensuring fairness throughout the ML lifecycle.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the important issue of fairness in machine learning (ML) systems. As ML models are deployed in the real world and updated over time, it can be challenging to ensure they remain fair and unbiased.
The researchers developed a framework called AdapFair that uses an optimal transport approach to continuously adapt the model and data distributions. This helps maintain fairness as the ML system evolves.
The key idea is to measure the distance between the model's predictions and the desired fair distribution using a mathematical concept called the Wasserstein distance. By minimizing this distance, the system can adapt to ensure the model's outputs stay fair, even as the underlying data and model change over time.
This is an important advance, as many existing fairness techniques only focus on the initial model training phase. AdapFair provides a way to maintain fairness throughout the entire ML lifecycle, which is crucial for real-world deployment.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the AdapFair framework, which leverages optimal transport theory to ensure continuous fairness in machine learning operations.
The core of the approach is to measure the distance between the model's output distribution and a target fair distribution using the Wasserstein distance. By minimizing this distance, the system can adapt the model parameters and data representation to maintain fairness as the ML system evolves over time.
Specifically, the authors formulate an optimization problem that jointly learns the model parameters and a fair data representation. This allows the system to adapt both the model and the data to ensure fairness, even as the underlying problem and data distribution change.
The researchers evaluate AdapFair on several benchmark fairness datasets and demonstrate its ability to maintain fairness over time, outperforming existing fairness techniques that only focus on the initial model training phase.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by addressing the important challenge of maintaining fairness in machine learning systems as they are updated and deployed in real-world scenarios.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is that the AdapFair approach assumes the availability of a target fair distribution, which may not always be known or easy to define in practice. Further research could explore ways to relax this assumption or learn the target distribution from data.
Additionally, the paper focuses on individual-level fairness, as measured by the Wasserstein distance. Other notions of fairness, such as group-level or causal fairness, could also be explored in future work to provide a more comprehensive fairness framework.
Overall, the AdapFair approach represents an important step forward in ensuring the long-term fairness of machine learning systems, and the authors have laid a solid foundation for further research in this area.
Conclusion
The "AdapFair: Ensuring Continuous Fairness for Machine Learning Operations" paper presents a novel framework for maintaining fairness in machine learning systems as they evolve over time. By leveraging optimal transport theory to adapt both the model and data distributions, the AdapFair approach can help ensure fairness throughout the entire ML lifecycle, an important advancement over existing fairness techniques.
While the paper has some limitations, such as the need for a known target fair distribution, it represents a significant step forward in addressing the critical challenge of long-term fairness in real-world machine learning applications. The insights and techniques developed in this work could have far-reaching implications for the responsible development and deployment of ML systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
AdapFair: Ensuring Continuous Fairness for Machine Learning Operations
Yinghui Huang, Zihao Tang, Xiangyu Chang
The biases and discrimination of machine learning algorithms have attracted significant attention, leading to the development of various algorithms tailored to specific contexts. However, these solutions often fall short of addressing fairness issues inherent in machine learning operations. In this paper, we present a debiasing framework designed to find an optimal fair transformation of input data that maximally preserves data predictability. A distinctive feature of our approach is its flexibility and efficiency. It can be integrated with any downstream black-box classifiers, providing continuous fairness guarantees with minimal retraining efforts, even in the face of frequent data drifts, evolving fairness requirements, and batches of similar tasks. To achieve this, we leverage the normalizing flows to enable efficient, information-preserving data transformation, ensuring that no critical information is lost during the debiasing process. Additionally, we incorporate the Wasserstein distance as the unfairness measure to guide the optimization of data transformations. Finally, we introduce an efficient optimization algorithm with closed-formed gradient computations, making our framework scalable and suitable for dynamic, real-world environments.
Read more9/24/2024
↗️
0
Normalise for Fairness: A Simple Normalisation Technique for Fairness in Regression Machine Learning Problems
Mostafa M. Amin, Bjorn W. Schuller
Algorithms and Machine Learning (ML) are increasingly affecting everyday life and several decision-making processes, where ML has an advantage due to scalability or superior performance. Fairness in such applications is crucial, where models should not discriminate their results based on race, gender, or other protected groups. This is especially crucial for models affecting very sensitive topics, like interview invitation or recidivism prediction. Fairness is not commonly studied for regression problems compared to binary classification problems; hence, we present a simple, yet effective method based on normalisation (FaiReg), which minimises the impact of unfairness in regression problems, especially due to labelling bias. We present a theoretical analysis of the method, in addition to an empirical comparison against two standard methods for fairness, namely data balancing and adversarial training. We also include a hybrid formulation (FaiRegH), merging the presented method with data balancing, in an attempt to face labelling and sampling biases simultaneously. The experiments are conducted on the multimodal dataset First Impressions (FI) with various labels, namely Big-Five personality prediction and interview screening score. The results show the superior performance of diminishing the effects of unfairness better than data balancing, also without deteriorating the performance of the original problem as much as adversarial training. Fairness is evaluated based on the Equal Accuracy (EA) and Statistical Parity (SP) constraints. The experiments present a setup that enhances the fairness for several protected variables simultaneously.
Read more8/21/2024
0
Is it Still Fair? A Comparative Evaluation of Fairness Algorithms through the Lens of Covariate Drift
Oscar Blessed Deho, Michael Bewong, Selasi Kwashie, Jiuyong Li, Jixue Liu, Lin Liu, Srecko Joksimovic
Over the last few decades, machine learning (ML) applications have grown exponentially, yielding several benefits to society. However, these benefits are tempered with concerns of discriminatory behaviours exhibited by ML models. In this regard, fairness in machine learning has emerged as a priority research area. Consequently, several fairness metrics and algorithms have been developed to mitigate against discriminatory behaviours that ML models may possess. Yet still, very little attention has been paid to the problem of naturally occurring changes in data patterns (textit{aka} data distributional drift), and its impact on fairness algorithms and metrics. In this work, we study this problem comprehensively by analyzing 4 fairness-unaware baseline algorithms and 7 fairness-aware algorithms, carefully curated to cover the breadth of its typology, across 5 datasets including public and proprietary data, and evaluated them using 3 predictive performance and 10 fairness metrics. In doing so, we show that (1) data distributional drift is not a trivial occurrence, and in several cases can lead to serious deterioration of fairness in so-called fair models; (2) contrary to some existing literature, the size and direction of data distributional drift is not correlated to the resulting size and direction of unfairness; and (3) choice of, and training of fairness algorithms is impacted by the effect of data distributional drift which is largely ignored in the literature. Emanating from our findings, we synthesize several policy implications of data distributional drift on fairness algorithms that can be very relevant to stakeholders and practitioners.
Read more9/20/2024
0
New!Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning
Massimiliano de Leoni, Alessandro Padella
Predictive business process analytics has become important for organizations, offering real-time operational support for their processes. However, these algorithms often perform unfair predictions because they are based on biased variables (e.g., gender or nationality), namely variables embodying discrimination. This paper addresses the challenge of integrating a debiasing phase into predictive business process analytics to ensure that predictions are not influenced by biased variables. Our framework leverages on adversial debiasing is evaluated on four case studies, showing a significant reduction in the contribution of biased variables to the predicted value. The proposed technique is also compared with the state of the art in fairness in process mining, illustrating that our framework allows for a more enhanced level of fairness, while retaining a better prediction quality.
Read more10/4/2024