Achieving Tool Calling Functionality in LLMs Using Only Prompt Engineering Without Fine-Tuning

Read original: arXiv:2407.04997 - Published 7/9/2024 by Shengtao He
Total Score

0

Achieving Tool Calling Functionality in LLMs Using Only Prompt Engineering Without Fine-Tuning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way for large language models (LLMs) to use external tools and services, without needing to be specifically trained on them. Instead, the researchers show how LLMs can be prompted to seamlessly integrate these tools into their workflow, allowing them to expand their capabilities beyond just natural language processing.

This is achieved through a novel prompt engineering approach, rather than having to fine-tune the LLM on each tool. The key idea is to provide the LLM with clear instructions on how to use a particular tool, along with examples of how to combine the tool's functionality with the LLM's language understanding. By structuring the prompts in the right way, the LLM can learn to call external tools as needed, without requiring extensive additional training.

The paper builds on and cites several related works that have explored different aspects of integrating tools and services with LLMs, such as LLM-Tool Compiler-Fused Parallel Function Calling, Towards Practical Tool Usage: Continually Learning LLMs, and COLT: Towards Completeness-Oriented Tool Retrieval in Large Language Models. The researchers aim to build on these previous efforts and provide a new approach that is more accessible and easier to implement.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel prompt engineering technique to achieve tool calling functionality in LLMs without the need for fine-tuning. The key idea is to provide the LLM with clear instructions and examples on how to use a specific tool, allowing the model to learn to seamlessly integrate the tool's functionality into its language understanding and generation capabilities.

The researchers design a structured prompt template that includes the following components:

  1. Tool Description: A detailed explanation of the tool's purpose, features, and usage.
  2. Example Usages: Step-by-step demonstrations of how to call the tool and incorporate its outputs into the LLM's responses.
  3. Coaching: Explicit instructions for the LLM on how to apply the tool correctly and interpret its results.

By presenting the LLM with this comprehensive prompt, the researchers show that the model can learn to effectively utilize the tool without requiring any fine-tuning on the specific tool or dataset. The paper evaluates the approach on a range of tasks and tools, demonstrating its versatility and effectiveness.

The researchers also discuss the potential limitations of this approach, such as the need for carefully crafted prompts and the potential for performance degradation as the number of integrated tools increases. They suggest areas for future research, such as developing more automated prompt engineering techniques and exploring ways to manage the complexity of tool integration at scale.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing the capabilities of LLMs through prompt engineering, without the need for resource-intensive fine-tuning. By enabling LLMs to seamlessly integrate external tools and services, the researchers are expanding the potential applications of these powerful language models beyond just natural language processing tasks.

One notable strength of the proposed technique is its accessibility and ease of implementation. Unlike fine-tuning, which can be a complex and time-consuming process, the prompt engineering approach outlined in the paper is relatively straightforward and does not require extensive modifications to the underlying LLM architecture. This makes the method more practical and widely applicable, especially for researchers and developers with limited resources.

However, the paper also acknowledges some potential limitations and areas for further research. As the number of integrated tools grows, the complexity of the prompts may increase, potentially leading to performance degradation or reduced generalization. Additionally, the effectiveness of the approach may be sensitive to the quality and completeness of the prompt design, which could be a challenging task for some use cases.

Further research could explore ways to automate or streamline the prompt engineering process, reducing the burden on the user and making the technique more scalable. Investigating the long-term stability and robustness of the tool integration, as well as the potential security and privacy implications, would also be valuable avenues for future work.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach that could significantly enhance the practical utility of LLMs and pave the way for more seamless integration of external tools and services. As the field of large language models continues to evolve, techniques like the one described in this paper will likely play an increasingly important role in unlocking the full potential of these powerful AI systems.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel prompt engineering technique that enables large language models (LLMs) to achieve tool calling functionality without the need for fine-tuning. By providing LLMs with clear instructions and examples on how to use external tools and services, the researchers demonstrate that the models can learn to seamlessly integrate these capabilities into their language understanding and generation workflows.

This approach represents a significant advancement in the field of LLM capabilities, as it allows these powerful AI systems to expand beyond their traditional natural language processing tasks and leverage a wider range of tools and functionalities. The accessibility and ease of implementation of the prompt engineering technique make it a promising solution for researchers and developers looking to enhance the practical utility of LLMs.

While the paper acknowledges some potential limitations, such as the complexity of prompt design and the scalability of tool integration, the overall findings suggest that this technique could have a transformative impact on the way LLMs are developed and deployed. As the field of large language models continues to evolve, the insights and approaches presented in this paper will likely play a crucial role in driving further advancements and unlocking new applications for these AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Achieving Tool Calling Functionality in LLMs Using Only Prompt Engineering Without Fine-Tuning
Total Score

0

Achieving Tool Calling Functionality in LLMs Using Only Prompt Engineering Without Fine-Tuning

Shengtao He

Currently, the vast majority of locally deployed open-source large language models (LLMs) and some commercial model interfaces do not support stable tool calling functionality. The existing solution involves fine-tuning LLMs, which results in significant time and computational resource consumption. This paper proposes a method that enables LLMs to achieve stable tool calling capabilities using only prompt engineering and some ingenious code design. We conducted experiments on multiple LLMs that lack tool calling capabilities across various tool calling tasks, achieving a success rate of 100%.

Read more

7/9/2024

An LLM-Tool Compiler for Fused Parallel Function Calling
Total Score

0

An LLM-Tool Compiler for Fused Parallel Function Calling

Simranjit Singh, Andreas Karatzas, Michael Fore, Iraklis Anagnostopoulos, Dimitrios Stamoulis

State-of-the-art sequential reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) has expanded the capabilities of Copilots beyond conversational tasks to complex function calling, managing thousands of API calls. However, the tendency of compositional prompting to segment tasks into multiple steps, each requiring a round-trip to the GPT APIs, leads to increased system latency and costs. Although recent advancements in parallel function calling have improved tool execution per API call, they may necessitate more detailed in-context instructions and task breakdown at the prompt level, resulting in higher engineering and production costs. Inspired by the hardware design principles of multiply-add (MAD) operations, which fuse multiple arithmetic operations into a single task from the compiler's perspective, we propose LLM-Tool Compiler, which selectively fuses similar types of tool operations under a single function at runtime, presenting them as a unified task to the LLM. This selective fusion inherently enhances parallelization and efficiency. Benchmarked on a large-scale Copilot platform, LLM-Tool Compiler achieves up to four times more parallel calls than existing methods, reducing token costs and latency by up to 40% and 12%, respectively.

Read more

5/29/2024

Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction
Total Score

0

Learning to Ask: When LLMs Meet Unclear Instruction

Wenxuan Wang, Juluan Shi, Chaozheng Wang, Cheryl Lee, Youliang Yuan, Jen-tse Huang, Michael R. Lyu

Equipped with the capability to call functions, modern large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone. However, the effective execution of these tools relies heavily not just on the advanced capabilities of LLMs but also on precise user instructions, which often cannot be ensured in the real world. To evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, we meticulously examine the real-world instructions queried from users, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench (NoisyToolBench). We find that due to the next-token prediction training objective, LLMs tend to arbitrarily generate the missed argument, which may lead to hallucinations and risks. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions. Moreover, to reduce the manual labor involved in user-LLM interaction and assess LLMs performance in tool utilization from both accuracy and efficiency perspectives, we design an automated evaluation tool named ToolEvaluator. Our experiments demonstrate that the AwN significantly outperforms existing frameworks for tool learning in the NoisyToolBench. We will release all related code and datasets to support future research.

Read more

9/6/2024

TinyAgent: Function Calling at the Edge
Total Score

0

TinyAgent: Function Calling at the Edge

Lutfi Eren Erdogan, Nicholas Lee, Siddharth Jha, Sehoon Kim, Ryan Tabrizi, Suhong Moon, Coleman Hooper, Gopala Anumanchipalli, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami

Recent large language models (LLMs) have enabled the development of advanced agentic systems that can integrate various tools and APIs to fulfill user queries through function calling. However, the deployment of these LLMs on the edge has not been explored since they typically require cloud-based infrastructure due to their substantial model size and computational demands. To this end, we present TinyAgent, an end-to-end framework for training and deploying task-specific small language model agents capable of function calling for driving agentic systems at the edge. We first show how to enable accurate function calling for open-source models via the LLMCompiler framework. We then systematically curate a high-quality dataset for function calling, which we use to fine-tune two small language models, TinyAgent-1.1B and 7B. For efficient inference, we introduce a novel tool retrieval method to reduce the input prompt length and utilize quantization to further accelerate the inference speed. As a driving application, we demonstrate a local Siri-like system for Apple's MacBook that can execute user commands through text or voice input. Our results show that our models can achieve, and even surpass, the function-calling capabilities of larger models like GPT-4-Turbo, while being fully deployed at the edge. We open-source our dataset, models, and installable package and provide a demo video for our MacBook assistant agent.

Read more

9/4/2024