AdapterSwap: Continuous Training of LLMs with Data Removal and Access-Control Guarantees
2404.08417
0
0
šļø
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of completing knowledge intensive tasks by recalling information from a static pretraining corpus. Here we are concerned with LLMs in the context of evolving data requirements. For instance: batches of new data that are introduced periodically; subsets of data with user-based access controls; or requirements on dynamic removal of documents with guarantees that associated knowledge cannot be recalled. We wish to satisfy these requirements while at the same time ensuring a model does not forget old information when new data becomes available. To address these issues, we introduce AdapterSwap, a training and inference scheme that organizes knowledge from a data collection into a set of low-rank adapters, which are dynamically composed during inference. Our experiments demonstrate AdapterSwap's ability to support efficient continual learning, while also enabling organizations to have fine-grained control over data access and deletion.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) can complete knowledge-intensive tasks by recalling information from their training data
- This paper focuses on LLMs in the context of evolving data requirements, such as:
- Introducing new data batches periodically
- Controlling data access based on user permissions
- Dynamically removing documents while ensuring associated knowledge cannot be recalled
- The goal is to satisfy these requirements while ensuring the model does not forget old information when new data becomes available
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. These models are becoming increasingly capable at tasks that require a lot of knowledge, like answering questions or summarizing information. This is because they can recall relevant facts and information from the data they were trained on.
However, real-world data requirements can change over time. For example, organizations may need to:
- Introduce new batches of data periodically to keep their models up-to-date
- Control access to certain data based on user permissions
- Dynamically remove documents while ensuring the model can't recall the associated knowledge
The challenge is how to satisfy these evolving requirements without causing the model to forget the old information it has learned. This paper introduces a new training and inference approach called AdapterSwap to address this problem.
Technical Explanation
AdapterSwap organizes the knowledge from a data collection into a set of "low-rank adapters" - small neural network components that can be dynamically composed during inference. This allows the model to efficiently learn new information continuously while also enabling organizations to have fine-grained control over data access and deletion.
The experiments in the paper demonstrate that AdapterSwap can support efficient continual learning, where the model can learn new information without forgetting old knowledge. It also enables organizations to dynamically manage data access and removal, ensuring that deleted information cannot be recalled by the model.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach to addressing the challenges of evolving data requirements for large language models. By using modular adapters to organize knowledge, AdapterSwap allows for more flexibility and control compared to traditional fine-tuning approaches.
However, the paper does not fully explore the potential limitations of this approach. For example, it's unclear how the performance of the model would scale as the number of adapters grows, or how the composition of adapters might impact the model's overall coherence and consistency.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the ability to remove documents, it doesn't address potential issues around the completeness of knowledge removal. Further research would be needed to ensure that all traces of deleted information are truly purged from the model.
Conclusion
This paper introduces AdapterSwap, a novel training and inference approach for large language models that aims to address the challenges of evolving data requirements. By organizing knowledge into modular adapters, AdapterSwap enables efficient continual learning and fine-grained control over data access and deletion.
The potential implications of this research are significant, as it could help organizations better manage the dynamic nature of their data and ensure that their language models remain up-to-date and secure. Further advancements in this area could lead to more robust and adaptable AI systems that can better serve the evolving needs of businesses and society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
Haizhou Shi, Zihao Xu, Hengyi Wang, Weiyi Qin, Wenyuan Wang, Yibin Wang, Hao Wang
0
0
The recent success of large language models (LLMs) trained on static, pre-collected, general datasets has sparked numerous research directions and applications. One such direction addresses the non-trivial challenge of integrating pre-trained LLMs into dynamic data distributions, task structures, and user preferences. Pre-trained LLMs, when tailored for specific needs, often experience significant performance degradation in previous knowledge domains -- a phenomenon known as catastrophic forgetting. While extensively studied in the continual learning (CL) community, it presents new manifestations in the realm of LLMs. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current research progress on LLMs within the context of CL. This survey is structured into four main sections: we first describe an overview of continually learning LLMs, consisting of two directions of continuity: vertical continuity (or vertical continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation from general to specific capabilities, and horizontal continuity (or horizontal continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation across time and domains (Section 3). We then summarize three stages of learning LLMs in the context of modern CL: Continual Pre-Training (CPT), Domain-Adaptive Pre-training (DAP), and Continual Fine-Tuning (CFT) (Section 4). Then we provide an overview of evaluation protocols for continual learning with LLMs, along with the current available data sources (Section 5). Finally, we discuss intriguing questions pertaining to continual learning for LLMs (Section 6). The full list of papers examined in this survey is available at https://github.com/Wang-ML-Lab/llm-continual-learning-survey.
4/26/2024
š¬
When Life gives you LLMs, make LLM-ADE: Large Language Models with Adaptive Data Engineering
Stephen Choi, William Gazeley
0
0
This paper presents the LLM-ADE framework, a novel methodology for continued pre-training of large language models (LLMs) that addresses the challenges of catastrophic forgetting and double descent. LLM-ADE employs dynamic architectural adjustments, including selective block freezing and expansion, tailored to specific datasets. This strategy enhances model adaptability to new data while preserving previously acquired knowledge. We demonstrate LLM-ADE's effectiveness on the TinyLlama model across various general knowledge benchmarks, showing significant performance improvements without the drawbacks of traditional continuous training methods. This approach promises a more versatile and robust way to keep LLMs current and efficient in real-world applications.
4/22/2024
š¬
Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Survey
Junhao Zheng, Shengjie Qiu, Chengming Shi, Qianli Ma
0
0
As the applications of large language models (LLMs) expand across diverse fields, the ability of these models to adapt to ongoing changes in data, tasks, and user preferences becomes crucial. Traditional training methods, relying on static datasets, are increasingly inadequate for coping with the dynamic nature of real-world information. Lifelong learning, also known as continual or incremental learning, addresses this challenge by enabling LLMs to learn continuously and adaptively over their operational lifetime, integrating new knowledge while retaining previously learned information and preventing catastrophic forgetting. This survey delves into the sophisticated landscape of lifelong learning, categorizing strategies into two primary groups: Internal Knowledge and External Knowledge. Internal Knowledge includes continual pretraining and continual finetuning, each enhancing the adaptability of LLMs in various scenarios. External Knowledge encompasses retrieval-based and tool-based lifelong learning, leveraging external data sources and computational tools to extend the model's capabilities without modifying core parameters. The key contributions of our survey are: (1) Introducing a novel taxonomy categorizing the extensive literature of lifelong learning into 12 scenarios; (2) Identifying common techniques across all lifelong learning scenarios and classifying existing literature into various technique groups within each scenario; (3) Highlighting emerging techniques such as model expansion and data selection, which were less explored in the pre-LLM era. Through a detailed examination of these groups and their respective categories, this survey aims to enhance the adaptability, reliability, and overall performance of LLMs in real-world applications.
6/11/2024
Towards Practical Tool Usage for Continually Learning LLMs
Jerry Huang, Prasanna Parthasarathi, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Sarath Chandar
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) show an innate skill for solving language based tasks. But insights have suggested an inability to adjust for information or task-solving skills becoming outdated, as their knowledge, stored directly within their parameters, remains static in time. Tool use helps by offloading work to systems that the LLM can access through an interface, but LLMs that use them still must adapt to nonstationary environments for prolonged use, as new tools can emerge and existing tools can change. Nevertheless, tools require less specialized knowledge, therefore we hypothesize they are better suited for continual learning (CL) as they rely less on parametric memory for solving tasks and instead focus on learning when to apply pre-defined tools. To verify this, we develop a synthetic benchmark and follow this by aggregating existing NLP tasks to form a more realistic testing scenario. While we demonstrate scaling model size is not a solution, regardless of tool usage, continual learning techniques can enable tool LLMs to both adapt faster while forgetting less, highlighting their potential as continual learners.
4/16/2024