Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks for Adversarial Robustness

Read original: arXiv:2405.11708 - Published 5/28/2024 by Shao-Yuan Lo, Vishal M. Patel
Total Score

0

Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks for Adversarial Robustness

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach called Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks (ABNNs) to improve the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks.
  • ABNNs adaptively adjust the batch normalization parameters during inference to enhance the model's resilience against adversarial attacks.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of ABNNs on various benchmark datasets and show that they outperform existing methods for improving adversarial robustness.

Plain English Explanation

Deep neural networks, despite their impressive performance on a wide range of tasks, are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. These are carefully crafted inputs that can cause the model to make incorrect predictions, even when the changes to the original input are almost imperceptible to the human eye.

The researchers behind this paper have developed a new technique called Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks (ABNNs) to make deep neural networks more robust against these adversarial attacks. Batch normalization is a widely used technique in deep learning that helps stabilize the training process and improve the model's performance. The key idea behind ABNNs is to adaptively adjust the batch normalization parameters during the inference (or testing) phase, based on the input being processed.

By dynamically modifying the batch normalization behavior, ABNNs can better handle adversarial perturbations and maintain accurate predictions, even when the input has been deliberately altered to trick the model. The authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach on several standard benchmarks, showing that ABNNs outperform other methods for improving adversarial robustness.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks (ABNNs), a novel approach to enhance the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks. Batch normalization is a popular technique used to improve the training stability and performance of deep models, but it can also make them more vulnerable to adversarial attacks.

The core idea behind ABNNs is to adaptively adjust the batch normalization parameters during the inference phase, based on the input being processed. This is achieved by introducing a small neural network, called the Adaptive Batch Normalization Module (ABNM), that learns to modulate the batch normalization parameters in response to the current input. The ABNM is trained alongside the main model, but it operates only during inference, allowing the model to dynamically adapt its behavior to better handle adversarial perturbations.

The authors evaluate the performance of ABNNs on several benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet, and compare them to various existing methods for improving adversarial robustness, such as Towards Better Adversarial Purification via Adversarial Denoising, Unraveling Batch Normalization for Realistic Test-Time Adaptation, and Attacking Bayes: Adversarial Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks. The results demonstrate that ABNNs consistently outperform these baselines in terms of adversarial robustness, while maintaining competitive clean-data performance.

Critical Analysis

The proposed Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks (ABNNs) offer a promising approach to improving the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks. By dynamically adjusting the batch normalization parameters during inference, ABNNs can better adapt to adversarial perturbations and maintain accurate predictions.

One potential limitation of the ABNN approach is the additional computational overhead introduced by the Adaptive Batch Normalization Module (ABNM). While the authors report that the ABNM adds only a small amount of extra inference time, the increased complexity of the overall model may be a concern for certain applications with strict real-time requirements or limited computational resources.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the robustness of ABNNs to more advanced adversarial attacks, such as Strong Transferable Adversarial Attacks or targeted attacks on the ABNM itself. Further research may be needed to fully understand the limitations and vulnerability of this approach under more sophisticated adversarial scenarios.

Despite these potential concerns, the core idea behind ABNNs is compelling and the authors have demonstrated its effectiveness on several standard benchmarks. The ability to dynamically adapt batch normalization behavior could have broader implications for improving the robustness and generalization of deep neural networks, beyond just adversarial attacks.

Conclusion

The Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks (ABNNs) proposed in this paper represent a significant advancement in the field of adversarial robustness for deep learning models. By introducing a novel adaptive batch normalization mechanism, the authors have shown that it is possible to enhance a model's resilience to adversarial attacks without compromising its clean-data performance.

The results presented in the paper are impressive and suggest that ABNNs could be a valuable tool for building more robust and trustworthy deep learning systems, with applications across a wide range of domains. While there are some potential limitations to address, the core ideas behind ABNNs demonstrate the ongoing progress in the important field of adversarial machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks for Adversarial Robustness
Total Score

0

Adaptive Batch Normalization Networks for Adversarial Robustness

Shao-Yuan Lo, Vishal M. Patel

Deep networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples. Adversarial Training (AT) has been a standard foundation of modern adversarial defense approaches due to its remarkable effectiveness. However, AT is extremely time-consuming, refraining it from wide deployment in practical applications. In this paper, we aim at a non-AT defense: How to design a defense method that gets rid of AT but is still robust against strong adversarial attacks? To answer this question, we resort to adaptive Batch Normalization (BN), inspired by the recent advances in test-time domain adaptation. We propose a novel defense accordingly, referred to as the Adaptive Batch Normalization Network (ABNN). ABNN employs a pre-trained substitute model to generate clean BN statistics and sends them to the target model. The target model is exclusively trained on clean data and learns to align the substitute model's BN statistics. Experimental results show that ABNN consistently improves adversarial robustness against both digital and physically realizable attacks on both image and video datasets. Furthermore, ABNN can achieve higher clean data performance and significantly lower training time complexity compared to AT-based approaches.

Read more

5/28/2024

Enhancing Tracking Robustness with Auxiliary Adversarial Defense Networks
Total Score

0

Enhancing Tracking Robustness with Auxiliary Adversarial Defense Networks

Zhewei Wu, Ruilong Yu, Qihe Liu, Shuying Cheng, Shilin Qiu, Shijie Zhou

Adversarial attacks in visual object tracking have significantly degraded the performance of advanced trackers by introducing imperceptible perturbations into images. However, there is still a lack of research on designing adversarial defense methods for object tracking. To address these issues, we propose an effective auxiliary pre-processing defense network, AADN, which performs defensive transformations on the input images before feeding them into the tracker. Moreover, it can be seamlessly integrated with other visual trackers as a plug-and-play module without parameter adjustments. We train AADN using adversarial training, specifically employing Dua-Loss to generate adversarial samples that simultaneously attack the classification and regression branches of the tracker. Extensive experiments conducted on the OTB100, LaSOT, and VOT2018 benchmarks demonstrate that AADN maintains excellent defense robustness against adversarial attack methods in both adaptive and non-adaptive attack scenarios. Moreover, when transferring the defense network to heterogeneous trackers, it exhibits reliable transferability. Finally, AADN achieves a processing time of up to 5ms/frame, allowing seamless integration with existing high-speed trackers without introducing significant computational overhead.

Read more

7/16/2024

Attacking Bayes: On the Adversarial Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Attacking Bayes: On the Adversarial Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks

Yunzhen Feng, Tim G. J. Rudner, Nikolaos Tsilivis, Julia Kempe

Adversarial examples have been shown to cause neural networks to fail on a wide range of vision and language tasks, but recent work has claimed that Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) are inherently robust to adversarial perturbations. In this work, we examine this claim. To study the adversarial robustness of BNNs, we investigate whether it is possible to successfully break state-of-the-art BNN inference methods and prediction pipelines using even relatively unsophisticated attacks for three tasks: (1) label prediction under the posterior predictive mean, (2) adversarial example detection with Bayesian predictive uncertainty, and (3) semantic shift detection. We find that BNNs trained with state-of-the-art approximate inference methods, and even BNNs trained with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks. We also identify various conceptual and experimental errors in previous works that claimed inherent adversarial robustness of BNNs and conclusively demonstrate that BNNs and uncertainty-aware Bayesian prediction pipelines are not inherently robust against adversarial attacks.

Read more

5/1/2024

Batch-in-Batch: a new adversarial training framework for initial perturbation and sample selection
Total Score

0

Batch-in-Batch: a new adversarial training framework for initial perturbation and sample selection

Yinting Wu (School of Mathematics and Statistics, and Key Lab NAA--MOE, Central China Normal University), Pai Peng (School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jianghan University), Bo Cai (Key Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, Ministry of Education, and School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Wuhan University), Le Li (School of Mathematics and Statistics, and Key Lab NAA--MOE, Central China Normal University), .

Adversarial training methods commonly generate independent initial perturbation for adversarial samples from a simple uniform distribution, and obtain the training batch for the classifier without selection. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective training framework called Batch-in-Batch (BB) to enhance models robustness. It involves specifically a joint construction of initial values that could simultaneously generates $m$ sets of perturbations from the original batch set to provide more diversity for adversarial samples; and also includes various sample selection strategies that enable the trained models to have smoother losses and avoid overconfident outputs. Through extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets (CIFAR-10, SVHN, CIFAR-100) with two networks (PreActResNet18 and WideResNet28-10) that are used in both the single-step (Noise-Fast Gradient Sign Method, N-FGSM) and multi-step (Projected Gradient Descent, PGD-10) adversarial training, we show that models trained within the BB framework consistently have higher adversarial accuracy across various adversarial settings, notably achieving over a 13% improvement on the SVHN dataset with an attack radius of 8/255 compared to the N-FGSM baseline model. Furthermore, experimental analysis of the efficiency of both the proposed initial perturbation method and sample selection strategies validates our insights. Finally, we show that our framework is cost-effective in terms of computational resources, even with a relatively large value of $m$.

Read more

6/7/2024