Adaptive Collaboration Strategy for LLMs in Medical Decision Making
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Foundation models have become essential for advancing the medical field.
- Despite their promise, effectively deploying large language models (LLMs) for complex medical tasks remains an open challenge.
- The authors present a novel framework called Medical Decision-making Agents (MDAgents) to address this gap.
Plain English Explanation
Foundation models are powerful AI systems that can be applied to a wide range of tasks. In the medical field, these models have shown great potential to assist in various medical decision-making processes. However, the best way to actually use these models in complex medical scenarios is still an open question.
The researchers developed a new framework called MDAgents to tackle this challenge. The key idea is to automatically assign the most effective collaboration structure for LLMs based on the complexity of the medical task at hand. This mimics the real-world process of how medical teams work together to make decisions.
The researchers evaluated their MDAgents framework across several challenging medical benchmarks, such as question-answering and visual reasoning tasks. They found that MDAgents outperformed other methods in 5 out of the 7 tested benchmarks, demonstrating its ability to effectively leverage LLMs for complex medical reasoning.
Through additional analysis, the researchers also gained insights into how these collaborative AI agents could behave in complex clinical team dynamics. Overall, the MDAgents framework represents an important step forward in applying foundation models to real-world medical decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The MDAgents framework aims to address the challenge of effectively deploying LLMs for complex medical tasks. It automatically assigns the most appropriate collaboration structure (solo or group) based on the complexity of the medical task at hand.
The researchers evaluated MDAgents across a suite of medical benchmarks, including MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, DDXPlus, PMC-VQA, Path-VQA, and MedVidQA. These benchmarks assess various aspects of medical reasoning, including question-answering and visual understanding.
The results show that MDAgents outperformed other methods in 5 out of the 7 benchmarks, demonstrating its ability to effectively leverage LLMs for complex medical tasks. Ablation studies revealed that MDAgents excels at adapting the number of collaborating agents to optimize efficiency and accuracy, highlighting its robustness across diverse scenarios.
The researchers also explore the dynamics of group consensus, offering insights into how collaborative AI agents could behave in complex clinical team dynamics.
Critical Analysis
The MDAgents framework represents an important step forward in applying foundation models to medical decision-making. By automatically adjusting the collaboration structure based on task complexity, the authors have developed a novel approach that mimics real-world medical teams.
One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on existing medical benchmarks, which may not fully capture the nuances and challenges of real-world clinical decision-making. Additional validation on more diverse and realistic medical tasks would further strengthen the claims.
Furthermore, the insights into group consensus dynamics provide an intriguing starting point, but more research is needed to fully understand the implications for clinical team interactions and decision-making processes. Exploring the ethical considerations and potential biases of such collaborative AI systems would also be a valuable area for further investigation.
Conclusion
The MDAgents framework presents a promising approach for effectively deploying foundation models in complex medical tasks. By automatically assigning the appropriate collaboration structure, the system outperforms other methods and offers insights into the dynamics of AI-powered clinical decision-making.
As foundation models continue to advance, the strategic integration of these powerful tools into real-world medical workflows will be crucial for driving innovation and improving patient outcomes. The MDAgents framework represents an important step in that direction, paving the way for more effective and nuanced AI-assisted medical decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
Adaptive Collaboration Strategy for LLMs in Medical Decision Making
Yubin Kim, Chanwoo Park, Hyewon Jeong, Yik Siu Chan, Xuhai Xu, Daniel McDuff, Cynthia Breazeal, Hae Won Park
Foundation models have become invaluable in advancing the medical field. Despite their promise, the strategic deployment of LLMs for effective utility in complex medical tasks remains an open question. Our novel framework, Medical Decision-making Agents (MDAgents) aims to address this gap by automatically assigning the effective collaboration structure for LLMs. Assigned solo or group collaboration structure is tailored to the complexity of the medical task at hand, emulating real-world medical decision making processes. We evaluate our framework and baseline methods with state-of-the-art LLMs across a suite of challenging medical benchmarks: MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, DDXPlus, PMC-VQA, Path-VQA, and MedVidQA, achieving the best performance in 5 out of 7 benchmarks that require an understanding of multi-modal medical reasoning. Ablation studies reveal that MDAgents excels in adapting the number of collaborating agents to optimize efficiency and accuracy, showcasing its robustness in diverse scenarios. We also explore the dynamics of group consensus, offering insights into how collaborative agents could behave in complex clinical team dynamics. Our code can be found at https://github.com/mitmedialab/MDAgents.
Read more4/24/2024
💬
0
MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning
Xiangru Tang, Anni Zou, Zhuosheng Zhang, Ziming Li, Yilun Zhao, Xingyao Zhang, Arman Cohan, Mark Gerstein
Large language models (LLMs), despite their remarkable progress across various general domains, encounter significant barriers in medicine and healthcare. This field faces unique challenges such as domain-specific terminologies and reasoning over specialized knowledge. To address these issues, we propose MedAgents, a novel multi-disciplinary collaboration framework for the medical domain. MedAgents leverages LLM-based agents in a role-playing setting that participate in a collaborative multi-round discussion, thereby enhancing LLM proficiency and reasoning capabilities. This training-free framework encompasses five critical steps: gathering domain experts, proposing individual analyses, summarising these analyses into a report, iterating over discussions until a consensus is reached, and ultimately making a decision. Our work focuses on the zero-shot setting, which is applicable in real-world scenarios. Experimental results on nine datasets (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and six subtasks from MMLU) establish that our proposed MedAgents framework excels at mining and harnessing the medical expertise within LLMs, as well as extending its reasoning abilities. Our code can be found at https://github.com/gersteinlab/MedAgents.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Agents for Clinical Decision Making in Oncology
Dyke Ferber, Omar S. M. El Nahhas, Georg Wolflein, Isabella C. Wiest, Jan Clusmann, Marie-Elisabeth Le{ss}man, Sebastian Foersch, Jacqueline Lammert, Maximilian Tschochohei, Dirk Jager, Manuel Salto-Tellez, Nikolaus Schultz, Daniel Truhn, Jakob Nikolas Kather
Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) systems have the potential to enhance clinical decision-making by interpreting various types of medical data. However, the effectiveness of these models across all medical fields is uncertain. Each discipline presents unique challenges that need to be addressed for optimal performance. This complexity is further increased when attempting to integrate different fields into a single model. Here, we introduce an alternative approach to multimodal medical AI that utilizes the generalist capabilities of a large language model (LLM) as a central reasoning engine. This engine autonomously coordinates and deploys a set of specialized medical AI tools. These tools include text, radiology and histopathology image interpretation, genomic data processing, web searches, and document retrieval from medical guidelines. We validate our system across a series of clinical oncology scenarios that closely resemble typical patient care workflows. We show that the system has a high capability in employing appropriate tools (97%), drawing correct conclusions (93.6%), and providing complete (94%), and helpful (89.2%) recommendations for individual patient cases while consistently referencing relevant literature (82.5%) upon instruction. This work provides evidence that LLMs can effectively plan and execute domain-specific models to retrieve or synthesize new information when used as autonomous agents. This enables them to function as specialist, patient-tailored clinical assistants. It also simplifies regulatory compliance by allowing each component tool to be individually validated and approved. We believe, that our work can serve as a proof-of-concept for more advanced LLM-agents in the medical domain.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Inquire, Interact, and Integrate: A Proactive Agent Collaborative Framework for Zero-Shot Multimodal Medical Reasoning
Zishan Gu, Fenglin Liu, Changchang Yin, Ping Zhang
The adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has attracted significant research interest. However, their performance in healthcare remains under-investigated and potentially limited, due to i) they lack rich domain-specific knowledge and medical reasoning skills; and ii) most state-of-the-art LLMs are unimodal, text-only models that cannot directly process multimodal inputs. To this end, we propose a multimodal medical collaborative reasoning framework textbf{MultiMedRes}, which incorporates a learner agent to proactively gain essential information from domain-specific expert models, to solve medical multimodal reasoning problems. Our method includes three steps: i) textbf{Inquire}: The learner agent first decomposes given complex medical reasoning problems into multiple domain-specific sub-problems; ii) textbf{Interact}: The agent then interacts with domain-specific expert models by repeating the ``ask-answer'' process to progressively obtain different domain-specific knowledge; iii) textbf{Integrate}: The agent finally integrates all the acquired domain-specific knowledge to accurately address the medical reasoning problem. We validate the effectiveness of our method on the task of difference visual question answering for X-ray images. The experiments demonstrate that our zero-shot prediction achieves state-of-the-art performance, and even outperforms the fully supervised methods. Besides, our approach can be incorporated into various LLMs and multimodal LLMs to significantly boost their performance.
Read more5/21/2024