Adaptive Contrastive Search: Uncertainty-Guided Decoding for Open-Ended Text Generation

Read original: arXiv:2407.18698 - Published 7/29/2024 by Esteban Garces Arias, Julian Rodemann, Meimingwei Li, Christian Heumann, Matthias A{ss}enmacher
Total Score

0

Adaptive Contrastive Search: Uncertainty-Guided Decoding for Open-Ended Text Generation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a new text generation method called Adaptive Contrastive Search (ACS) that leverages language model uncertainty to guide the decoding process
  • Aims to improve the quality and diversity of open-ended text generation
  • Outperforms state-of-the-art methods on various text generation benchmarks

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new technique called Adaptive Contrastive Search (ACS) for generating high-quality, diverse text. The key idea is to use the language model's own uncertainty about what to generate next as a guide during the decoding process.

Normally, text generation models try to predict the most likely next word based on the context. ACS instead explores alternative options, favoring paths that the model is less certain about. This encourages the model to venture beyond the obvious and generate more creative and unexpected output.

The method works by periodically evaluating the model's confidence in its predictions and using that information to adjust the search strategy. Areas of high uncertainty are explored more thoroughly, while more certain predictions are given less priority. This adaptive approach allows the model to balance exploration and exploitation, leading to more diverse and engaging text.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Adaptive Contrastive Search (ACS), a novel decoding algorithm for open-ended text generation. ACS leverages the language model's own uncertainty about its predictions to guide the decoding process in a more adaptive and exploratory way.

Traditionally, text generation models use beam search or greedy decoding, which tend to converge on the most likely but often repetitive or dull outputs. ACS, on the other hand, periodically evaluates the model's confidence in its predictions and uses that information to adjust the search strategy.

Specifically, ACS maintains a pool of candidate continuations and dynamically allocates more exploration to paths with higher uncertainty, as measured by the model's entropy. This encourages the model to venture beyond the most obvious choices and discover more diverse and creative outputs.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of ACS on a range of text generation tasks, including story completion, open-ended dialogue, and language model self-evaluation. ACS consistently outperforms traditional decoding methods in terms of both quality and diversity of the generated text.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a convincing case for the benefits of Adaptive Contrastive Search (ACS) over standard decoding techniques. By leveraging the language model's own uncertainty, ACS is able to generate more diverse and engaging text across a variety of tasks.

However, the paper does not explore the potential limitations or drawbacks of the ACS approach. For example, it's unclear how ACS would perform in scenarios where the language model has significant biases or blind spots in its understanding. There may be cases where the model's uncertainty leads it astray, generating nonsensical or undesirable outputs.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential computational overhead of the adaptive search process. Continuously evaluating model uncertainty and adjusting the search strategy may come at a performance cost, which could limit the practical applicability of ACS in real-world scenarios.

Further research is needed to better understand the strengths, weaknesses, and edge cases of the ACS approach, as well as its scalability and efficiency. Comparative studies against other advanced decoding techniques, such as self-evaluation decoding or direct metrics optimization, would also help contextualize the contributions of this work.

Conclusion

The Adaptive Contrastive Search (ACS) method presented in this paper represents a promising advance in open-ended text generation. By leveraging the language model's own uncertainty, ACS is able to generate more diverse and engaging text across a range of tasks, outperforming traditional decoding techniques.

While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of ACS, further research is needed to fully understand its limitations and potential drawbacks. Nonetheless, the core idea of using model uncertainty to guide the decoding process is a compelling one and could have broader applications in other areas of language generation and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Adaptive Contrastive Search: Uncertainty-Guided Decoding for Open-Ended Text Generation
Total Score

0

Adaptive Contrastive Search: Uncertainty-Guided Decoding for Open-Ended Text Generation

Esteban Garces Arias, Julian Rodemann, Meimingwei Li, Christian Heumann, Matthias A{ss}enmacher

Decoding from the output distributions of large language models to produce high-quality text is a complex challenge in language modeling. Various approaches, such as beam search, sampling with temperature, $k-$sampling, nucleus $p-$sampling, typical decoding, contrastive decoding, and contrastive search, have been proposed to address this problem, aiming to improve coherence, diversity, as well as resemblance to human-generated text. In this study, we introduce adaptive contrastive search, a novel decoding strategy extending contrastive search by incorporating an adaptive degeneration penalty, guided by the estimated uncertainty of the model at each generation step. This strategy is designed to enhance both the creativity and diversity of the language modeling process while at the same time producing coherent and high-quality generated text output. Our findings indicate performance enhancement in both aspects, across different model architectures and datasets, underscoring the effectiveness of our method in text generation tasks. Our code base, datasets, and models are publicly available.

Read more

7/29/2024

Improving Open-Ended Text Generation via Adaptive Decoding
Total Score

0

Improving Open-Ended Text Generation via Adaptive Decoding

Wenhong Zhu, Hongkun Hao, Zhiwei He, Yiming Ai, Rui Wang

Current language models decode text token by token according to probabilistic distribution, and determining the appropriate candidates for the next token is crucial to ensure generation quality. This study introduces adaptive decoding, a mechanism that dynamically empowers language models to ascertain a sensible candidate set during generation. Specifically, we introduce an entropy-based metric called confidence and conceptualize determining the optimal candidate set as a confidence-increasing process. The rationality of including a token in the candidate set is assessed by leveraging the increment of confidence. Experimental results reveal that our method balances diversity and coherence well. The human evaluation shows that our method can generate human-preferred text. Additionally, our method can potentially improve the reasoning ability of language models.

Read more

6/4/2024

Enhancing Contextual Understanding in Large Language Models through Contrastive Decoding
Total Score

0

Enhancing Contextual Understanding in Large Language Models through Contrastive Decoding

Zheng Zhao, Emilio Monti, Jens Lehmann, Haytham Assem

Large language models (LLMs) tend to inadequately integrate input context during text generation, relying excessively on encoded prior knowledge in model parameters, potentially resulting in generated text with factual inconsistencies or contextually unfaithful content. LLMs utilize two primary knowledge sources: 1) prior (parametric) knowledge from pretraining, and 2) contextual (non-parametric) knowledge from input prompts. The study addresses the open question of how LLMs effectively balance these knowledge sources during the generation process, specifically in the context of open-domain question answering. To address this issue, we introduce a novel approach integrating contrastive decoding with adversarial irrelevant passages as negative samples to enhance robust context grounding during generation. Notably, our method operates at inference time without requiring further training. We conduct comprehensive experiments to demonstrate its applicability and effectiveness, providing empirical evidence showcasing its superiority over existing methodologies. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/amazon-science/ContextualUnderstanding-ContrastiveDecoding.

Read more

5/7/2024

Adaptive Contrastive Decoding in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Handling Noisy Contexts
Total Score

0

Adaptive Contrastive Decoding in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Handling Noisy Contexts

Youna Kim, Hyuhng Joon Kim, Cheonbok Park, Choonghyun Park, Hyunsoo Cho, Junyeob Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Sang-goo Lee, Taeuk Kim

When using large language models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive tasks, such as open-domain question answering, external context can bridge a gap between external knowledge and LLM's parametric knowledge. Recent research has been developed to amplify contextual knowledge over the parametric knowledge of LLM with contrastive decoding approaches. While these approaches could yield truthful responses when relevant context is provided, they are prone to vulnerabilities when faced with noisy contexts. We extend the scope of previous studies to encompass noisy contexts and propose adaptive contrastive decoding (ACD) to leverage contextual influence effectively. ACD demonstrates improvements in open-domain question answering tasks compared to baselines, especially in robustness by remaining undistracted by noisy contexts in retrieval-augmented generation.

Read more

8/6/2024