Interventional Causal Structure Discovery over Graphical Models with Convergence and Optimality Guarantees
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are used to model causal relationships between variables
- Causal structure learning aims to discover the underlying DAG from observational and interventional data
- This paper presents a method for interventional causal structure discovery with convergence and optimality guarantees
Plain English Explanation
Causal relationships between different factors or variables can be represented using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). In these graphs, the nodes represent the variables and the directed edges indicate causal relationships between them.
The process of discovering the underlying causal structure, or DAG, from observed data is known as causal structure learning. This is an important task in fields like medicine, economics, and social science, where understanding causal mechanisms can lead to better decision-making and interventions.
This paper introduces a new method for interventional causal structure discovery. Interventional data refers to observations made after deliberately manipulating or intervening on certain variables. The researchers show that their method can reliably uncover the true causal structure, even in complex settings, and provide theoretical guarantees on its convergence and optimality.
Technical Explanation
The key aspects of the proposed method are:
-
Graphical Model Representation: The authors use a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to represent the causal relationships between variables.
-
Interventional Data: In addition to observational data, the method utilizes interventional data, where certain variables are deliberately manipulated to study their causal effects.
-
Bilevel Optimization: The causal structure learning problem is formulated as a bilevel optimization problem, with the outer level optimizing the structure of the DAG and the inner level optimizing the parameters of the graphical model.
-
Polynomial Optimization: The authors leverage polynomial optimization techniques to efficiently solve the bilevel optimization problem and provide guarantees on the convergence and optimality of the discovered causal structure.
-
Distributed Setting: The method can be applied in a distributed setting, where the data and computation are distributed across multiple agents or machines.
The key insights and contributions of this work are the development of a causal structure learning algorithm that can leverage both observational and interventional data, while providing theoretical guarantees on its performance. This advances the state-of-the-art in causal discovery and has important implications for fields that rely on understanding causal relationships.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the proposed method, including proofs of convergence and optimality guarantees. However, the practical applicability of the method may be limited by the computational complexity of the bilevel optimization and polynomial optimization techniques, especially for large-scale problems.
Additionally, the authors acknowledge that the method assumes certain properties of the underlying causal structure, such as acyclicity and the availability of interventional data. In real-world scenarios, these assumptions may not always hold, and further research is needed to relax these constraints.
Finally, the paper does not provide extensive empirical evaluations or comparisons to other causal discovery methods. While the theoretical analysis is strong, more experimental validation would be helpful to assess the method's performance in diverse settings and against alternative approaches.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method for interventional causal structure discovery over graphical models, with strong theoretical guarantees on convergence and optimality. The key innovations include the use of bilevel optimization and polynomial optimization techniques to efficiently uncover the underlying causal structure, even in complex and distributed settings.
While the theoretical foundations of the method are solid, further research is needed to address practical limitations and real-world complexities. Nonetheless, this work represents an important advance in the field of causal discovery and has the potential to significantly impact various domains that rely on understanding causal relationships.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Interventional Causal Structure Discovery over Graphical Models with Convergence and Optimality Guarantees
Qiu Chengbo, Yang Kai
Learning causal structure from sampled data is a fundamental problem with applications in various fields, including healthcare, machine learning and artificial intelligence. Traditional methods predominantly rely on observational data, but there exist limits regarding the identifiability of causal structures with only observational data. Interventional data, on the other hand, helps establish a cause-and-effect relationship by breaking the influence of confounding variables. It remains to date under-explored to develop a mathematical framework that seamlessly integrates both observational and interventional data in causal structure learning. Furthermore, existing studies often focus on centralized approaches, necessitating the transfer of entire datasets to a single server, which lead to considerable communication overhead and heightened risks to privacy. To tackle these challenges, we develop a bilevel polynomial optimization (Bloom) framework. Bloom not only provides a powerful mathematical modeling framework, underpinned by theoretical support, for causal structure discovery from both interventional and observational data, but also aspires to an efficient causal discovery algorithm with convergence and optimality guarantees. We further extend Bloom to a distributed setting to reduce the communication overhead and mitigate data privacy risks. It is seen through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets that Bloom markedly surpasses other leading learning algorithms.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Bayesian Intervention Optimization for Causal Discovery
Yuxuan Wang, Mingzhou Liu, Xinwei Sun, Wei Wang, Yizhou Wang
Causal discovery is crucial for understanding complex systems and informing decisions. While observational data can uncover causal relationships under certain assumptions, it often falls short, making active interventions necessary. Current methods, such as Bayesian and graph-theoretical approaches, do not prioritize decision-making and often rely on ideal conditions or information gain, which is not directly related to hypothesis testing. We propose a novel Bayesian optimization-based method inspired by Bayes factors that aims to maximize the probability of obtaining decisive and correct evidence. Our approach uses observational data to estimate causal models under different hypotheses, evaluates potential interventions pre-experimentally, and iteratively updates priors to refine interventions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through various experiments. Our contributions provide a robust framework for efficient causal discovery through active interventions, enhancing the practical application of theoretical advancements.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi
Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Interventional Causal Discovery in a Mixture of DAGs
Burak Var{i}c{i}, Dmitriy Katz-Rogozhnikov, Dennis Wei, Prasanna Sattigeri, Ali Tajer
Causal interactions among a group of variables are often modeled by a single causal graph. In some domains, however, these interactions are best described by multiple co-existing causal graphs, e.g., in dynamical systems or genomics. This paper addresses the hitherto unknown role of interventions in learning causal interactions among variables governed by a mixture of causal systems, each modeled by one directed acyclic graph (DAG). Causal discovery from mixtures is fundamentally more challenging than single-DAG causal discovery. Two major difficulties stem from (i) inherent uncertainty about the skeletons of the component DAGs that constitute the mixture and (ii) possibly cyclic relationships across these component DAGs. This paper addresses these challenges and aims to identify edges that exist in at least one component DAG of the mixture, referred to as true edges. First, it establishes matching necessary and sufficient conditions on the size of interventions required to identify the true edges. Next, guided by the necessity results, an adaptive algorithm is designed that learns all true edges using ${cal O}(n^2)$ interventions, where $n$ is the number of nodes. Remarkably, the size of the interventions is optimal if the underlying mixture model does not contain cycles across its components. More generally, the gap between the intervention size used by the algorithm and the optimal size is quantified. It is shown to be bounded by the cyclic complexity number of the mixture model, defined as the size of the minimal intervention that can break the cycles in the mixture, which is upper bounded by the number of cycles among the ancestors of a node.
Read more6/14/2024