Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models
2402.01929
0
0
🤷
Abstract
Causal discovery, the task of inferring causal structure from data, promises to accelerate scientific research, inform policy making, and more. However, causal discovery algorithms over larger sets of variables tend to be brittle against misspecification or when data are limited. To mitigate these challenges, we train a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms run over subsets of variables, along with other statistical hints like inverse covariance. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of classical methods remain comparable across datasets. Theoretically, we show that this model is well-specified, in the sense that it can recover a causal graph consistent with graphs over subsets. Empirically, we train the model to be robust to erroneous estimates using diverse synthetic data. Experiments on real and synthetic data demonstrate that this model maintains high accuracy in the face of misspecification or distribution shift, and can be adapted at low cost to different discovery algorithms or choice of statistics.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Causal discovery is the task of inferring causal structure from data, with applications in scientific research and policy making.
- Existing causal discovery algorithms can be brittle when dealing with larger sets of variables or limited data.
- This paper presents a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms and other statistical hints.
Plain English Explanation
The paper addresses the challenge of causal discovery, which is the process of understanding the underlying causal relationships in a dataset. Causal discovery has important applications in fields like scientific research and policy making.
However, existing causal discovery algorithms can struggle when dealing with datasets that have a large number of variables or limited data. To address this, the researchers trained a machine learning model to predict a more complete causal graph by combining the outputs of multiple classical causal discovery methods along with other statistical clues.
The key insight is that the typical mistakes made by classical algorithms tend to be similar across different datasets. By learning from these patterns, the model can make more robust predictions, even when the input data is imperfect or the underlying causal structure shifts.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a supervised learning approach to causal discovery. The model takes as input the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms, such as PC or GES, run on subsets of the variables. It also incorporates other statistical information, like the inverse covariance matrix.
The key insight is that the errors made by classical algorithms tend to be consistent across datasets. By learning these error patterns, the model can make predictions about the larger causal graph that are more robust to misspecification or distribution shift.
Theoretically, the authors show that their model is well-specified, meaning it can recover causal graphs that are consistent with the ground truth. Empirically, they train the model on diverse synthetic data to make it resilient to erroneous estimates.
Experiments on real and synthetic datasets demonstrate that the proposed model maintains high accuracy even when the input data is imperfect or the underlying causal structure changes. Additionally, the model can be easily adapted to work with different causal discovery algorithms or statistical features.
Critical Analysis
The paper addresses an important challenge in causal discovery, which is the brittleness of classical algorithms when dealing with larger sets of variables or limited data. The proposed supervised learning approach is a clever way to leverage the strengths of multiple classical methods, while also being more robust to common sources of error.
One potential limitation is that the model's performance may still be dependent on the quality of the input causal discovery algorithms and statistical features. If these inputs are highly unreliable, the model's predictions may also be compromised. Additionally, the paper does not explore the model's performance on real-world datasets with complex, high-dimensional causal structures.
Further research could investigate ways to make the model even more robust, such as by incorporating uncertainty estimates or active learning techniques to guide the data collection process. Exploring the model's scalability and generalization to a wider range of causal discovery problems would also be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to causal discovery that aims to overcome the limitations of classical algorithms. By training a supervised model to leverage the outputs of multiple causal discovery methods and other statistical information, the researchers have developed a system that can make more robust predictions, even in the face of misspecification or distribution shift.
The potential implications of this work are significant, as causal discovery is a crucial tool for advancing scientific understanding and informing policy decisions. By making causal discovery more reliable and scalable, this research could help accelerate progress in a wide range of fields.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Discovering Mixtures of Structural Causal Models from Time Series Data
Sumanth Varambally, Yi-An Ma, Rose Yu
0
0
Discovering causal relationships from time series data is significant in fields such as finance, climate science, and neuroscience. However, contemporary techniques rely on the simplifying assumption that data originates from the same causal model, while in practice, data is heterogeneous and can stem from different causal models. In this work, we relax this assumption and perform causal discovery from time series data originating from a mixture of causal models. We propose a general variational inference-based framework called MCD to infer the underlying causal models as well as the mixing probability of each sample. Our approach employs an end-to-end training process that maximizes an evidence-lower bound for the data likelihood. We present two variants: MCD-Linear for linear relationships and independent noise, and MCD-Nonlinear for nonlinear causal relationships and history-dependent noise. We demonstrate that our method surpasses state-of-the-art benchmarks in causal discovery tasks through extensive experimentation on synthetic and real-world datasets, particularly when the data emanates from diverse underlying causal graphs. Theoretically, we prove the identifiability of such a model under some mild assumptions.
6/26/2024
Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi
0
0
Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.
6/26/2024
👁️
GRACE-C: Generalized Rate Agnostic Causal Estimation via Constraints
Mohammadsajad Abavisani, David Danks, Sergey Plis
0
0
Graphical structures estimated by causal learning algorithms from time series data can provide misleading causal information if the causal timescale of the generating process fails to match the measurement timescale of the data. Existing algorithms provide limited resources to respond to this challenge, and so researchers must either use models that they know are likely misleading, or else forego causal learning entirely. Existing methods face up-to-four distinct shortfalls, as they might 1) require that the difference between causal and measurement timescales is known; 2) only handle very small number of random variables when the timescale difference is unknown; 3) only apply to pairs of variables; or 4) be unable to find a solution given statistical noise in the data. This research addresses these challenges. Our approach combines constraint programming with both theoretical insights into the problem structure and prior information about admissible causal interactions to achieve multiple orders of magnitude in speed-up. The resulting system maintains theoretical guarantees while scaling to significantly larger sets of random variables (>100) without knowledge of timescale differences. This method is also robust to edge misidentification and can use parametric connection strengths, while optionally finding the optimal solution among many possible ones.
5/22/2024
🏷️
Discrete Nonparametric Causal Discovery Under Latent Class Confounding
Bijan Mazaheri, Spencer Gordon, Yuval Rabani, Leonard Schulman
0
0
An acyclic causal structure can be described using a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with arrows indicating causation. The task of learning this structure from data is known as causal discovery. Diverse populations or changing environments can sometimes give rise to heterogeneous data. This heterogeneity can be thought of as a mixture model with multiple sources, each exerting their own distinct signature on the observed variables. From this perspective, the source is a latent common cause for every observed variable. While some methods for causal discovery are able to work around unobserved confounding in special cases, the only known ways to deal with a global confounder (such as a latent class) involve parametric assumptions. Focusing on discrete observables, we demonstrate that globally confounded causal structures can still be identifiable without parametric assumptions, so long as the number of latent classes remains small relative to the size and sparsity of the underlying DAG.
5/24/2024