Adaptive proximal gradient methods are universal without approximation

Overview

• Adaptive proximal gradient methods for convex optimization problems can converge without the traditional Lipschitz continuity assumption
• The analysis shows that a class of linesearch-free methods can converge under local Hölder gradient continuity, including continuously differentiable semi-algebraic functions
• Avoids the need for ε-oracles or linesearch procedures by exploiting Hölder inequalities
• Proves full sequence convergence without prior knowledge of local Hölder constants or the order of Hölder continuity
• Numerical experiments compare the method to baseline approaches on machine learning tasks with locally and globally Hölder continuous functions

Plain English Explanation

Optimization problems are common in machine learning, where we try to find the best settings for the parameters of a model. Traditionally, these optimization methods have required the gradients (the rates of change) of the objective function to satisfy a Lipschitz continuity condition. This means the gradients can't change too quickly as we move around the function.

However, the researchers show that a class of adaptive proximal gradient methods can still converge even without this Lipschitz condition. Instead, they only require the gradients to satisfy a weaker Hölder continuity condition, which is more flexible. This covers a broader range of objective functions, including those that are continuously differentiable semi-algebraic functions.

To handle the lack of Lipschitz continuity, previous approaches have used ε-oracles (which approximate the gradients) or linesearch procedures. In contrast, this method exploits plain Hölder inequalities, avoiding the need for any approximations while still retaining the linesearch-free nature of the adaptive schemes.

Importantly, the method also proves full sequence convergence without requiring prior knowledge of the local Hölder constants or the order of Hölder continuity. This makes it more practical to apply in real-world settings.

The researchers validate their approach through numerical experiments on diverse machine learning tasks, comparing it to baseline methods in both the locally and globally Hölder continuous settings.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contributions of the paper are:

1. Convergence Analysis: The researchers prove that a class of linesearch-free, adaptive proximal gradient methods can converge under mere local Hölder gradient continuity, without requiring the traditional Lipschitz continuity assumption. This covers a broader range of objective functions, including continuously differentiable semi-algebraic functions.

2. Avoidance of Approximations: To mitigate the lack of local Lipschitz continuity, previous approaches have relied on ε-oracles and/or linesearch procedures. In contrast, this method exploits plain Hölder inequalities, avoiding the need for any approximations while retaining the linesearch-free nature of the adaptive schemes.

3. Full Sequence Convergence: The researchers prove full sequence convergence of their method without requiring prior knowledge of the local Hölder constants or the order of Hölder continuity. This makes the approach more practical and applicable to real-world problems.

4. Empirical Validation: Numerical experiments are conducted on diverse machine learning tasks, comparing the proposed method to baseline approaches in both the locally and globally Hölder continuous settings.

The theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrate the benefits of the proposed adaptive proximal gradient method in terms of its flexibility, efficiency, and practical applicability.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling theoretical analysis and empirical validation of the proposed adaptive proximal gradient method. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth considering:

1. Generalization to Nonconvex Problems: The current analysis is focused on convex optimization problems. It would be valuable to investigate whether the method can be extended to nonconvex optimization problems, which are more prevalent in modern machine learning applications.

2. Sensitivity to Hölder Constants: While the method does not require prior knowledge of the local Hölder constants, it is unclear how sensitive the performance is to the actual values of these constants in practice. Further analysis on the robustness to these parameters would be insightful.

3. Comparison to Adaptive Methods with Linesearch: The paper compares the proposed linesearch-free method to baseline approaches, but it may be useful to also compare it to adaptive methods that do employ linesearch procedures, to better understand the trade-offs between the two approaches.

4. Theoretical Tightness of Convergence Rates: The paper establishes the convergence of the proposed method, but it would be valuable to investigate whether the derived convergence rates are tight or if there is room for improvement through further refinement of the analysis.

Overall, the paper presents a significant advancement in the field of adaptive proximal gradient methods, with the potential for broader impact on optimization problems in machine learning and beyond.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that adaptive proximal gradient methods for convex optimization problems can be made more flexible by relaxing the traditional Lipschitz continuity assumption. The proposed approach, which exploits Hölder continuity and avoids the need for ε-oracles or linesearch procedures, offers several key advantages:

1. Convergence under mere local Hölder gradient continuity, covering a broader range of objective functions
2. Retention of the linesearch-free nature of adaptive schemes without requiring any approximations
3. Full sequence convergence without prior knowledge of local Hölder constants or the order of Hölder continuity

The empirical validation on diverse machine learning tasks further highlights the practical applicability and benefits of this adaptive proximal gradient method. While the current analysis is limited to convex problems, the insights gained from this research could potentially inspire future work on extending the approach to nonconvex settings, ultimately expanding the reach and impact of adaptive optimization techniques in the field of machine learning.