On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization
1808.05671
0
0
🛠️
Abstract
Adaptive gradient methods are workhorses in deep learning. However, the convergence guarantees of adaptive gradient methods for nonconvex optimization have not been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we provide a fine-grained convergence analysis for a general class of adaptive gradient methods including AMSGrad, RMSProp and AdaGrad. For smooth nonconvex functions, we prove that adaptive gradient methods in expectation converge to a first-order stationary point. Our convergence rate is better than existing results for adaptive gradient methods in terms of dimension. In addition, we also prove high probability bounds on the convergence rates of AMSGrad, RMSProp as well as AdaGrad, which have not been established before. Our analyses shed light on better understanding the mechanism behind adaptive gradient methods in optimizing nonconvex objectives.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a detailed convergence analysis of a class of adaptive gradient methods, including AMSGrad, RMSProp, and AdaGrad, for optimizing nonconvex functions.
- The authors prove that these adaptive gradient methods converge to a first-order stationary point in expectation for smooth nonconvex functions.
- They also establish high-probability convergence rate bounds for AMSGrad, RMSProp, and AdaGrad, which were previously unknown.
- This analysis sheds light on the underlying mechanisms of these popular adaptive gradient methods for optimizing nonconvex objectives.
Plain English Explanation
In the field of deep learning, adaptive gradient methods are widely used to train neural networks. These methods, such as AMSGrad, RMSProp, and AdaGrad, automatically adapt the learning rate for each parameter during the optimization process.
This paper takes a closer look at how these adaptive gradient methods behave when optimizing nonconvex functions, which are common in deep learning problems. The authors provide a detailed mathematical analysis to understand the convergence properties of these methods.
They prove that, on average, these adaptive gradient methods will converge to a point where the gradient of the function is close to zero. This means they will find a local minimum or saddle point of the nonconvex function. Importantly, the authors show that their convergence rates are better than previous results in terms of the dimensionality of the problem.
Additionally, the paper establishes high-probability bounds on the convergence rates of AMSGrad, RMSProp, and AdaGrad. This means they can provide guarantees on how quickly these methods will converge, with a high degree of confidence.
Overall, this work helps us better understand the inner workings of popular adaptive gradient methods and their behavior when optimizing complex, nonconvex functions, which is crucial for advancing deep learning techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a convergence analysis for a class of adaptive gradient methods, including AMSGrad, RMSProp, and AdaGrad, for optimizing smooth nonconvex functions. The authors prove that these methods converge to a first-order stationary point in expectation.
Specifically, they show that the expected squared gradient norm of the iterates produced by these adaptive gradient methods decreases at a rate of O(1/√T), where T is the number of iterations. This convergence rate is better than the existing results for adaptive gradient methods in terms of the problem dimensionality.
Furthermore, the paper establishes high-probability convergence rate bounds for AMSGrad, RMSProp, and AdaGrad. These high-probability results provide guarantees on the convergence of these methods, which were not available before.
The key technical ingredients in the analyses include:
- A careful examination of the updates performed by the adaptive gradient methods
- The use of supermartingale arguments to derive the convergence in expectation
- Concentration inequalities to obtain the high-probability convergence rate bounds
The authors' analyses shed light on the underlying mechanisms that drive the success of adaptive gradient methods in optimizing nonconvex objectives, which is crucial for further improving these optimization techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the convergence properties of adaptive gradient methods for nonconvex optimization, which is an important theoretical contribution to the field. The authors' analyses are technically sound and the results are significant, as they establish improved convergence guarantees compared to previous work.
However, it is worth noting that the analysis is limited to smooth nonconvex functions. In practice, many deep learning problems involve nonsmooth or even discontinuous objective functions, which may require different analytical techniques. Additionally, the paper does not consider the impact of hyperparameter choices, which can significantly affect the practical performance of these adaptive gradient methods.
Furthermore, the paper focuses on convergence to first-order stationary points, which may not always be sufficient. In some cases, it may be desirable to converge to second-order stationary points (local minima) to avoid saddle points. Extending the analysis to higher-order stationary points could be an area for future research.
Despite these limitations, the insights provided in this paper contribute to a better understanding of adaptive gradient methods and their behavior in nonconvex optimization. This knowledge can inform the design of more efficient and robust optimization algorithms for deep learning and other machine learning applications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a detailed convergence analysis of a class of adaptive gradient methods, including AMSGrad, RMSProp, and AdaGrad, for optimizing smooth nonconvex functions. The authors prove that these methods converge to a first-order stationary point in expectation and provide improved convergence rate bounds compared to previous results.
The analysis sheds light on the underlying mechanisms that drive the success of adaptive gradient methods in deep learning, where nonconvex optimization is ubiquitous. This theoretical understanding can guide the development of more effective optimization algorithms and lead to further advancements in the field of deep learning and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔗
Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Gradient Methods under Refined Smoothness and Noise Assumptions
Devyani Maladkar, Ruichen Jiang, Aryan Mokhtari
0
0
Adaptive gradient methods are arguably the most successful optimization algorithms for neural network training. While it is well-known that adaptive gradient methods can achieve better dimensional dependence than stochastic gradient descent (SGD) under favorable geometry for stochastic convex optimization, the theoretical justification for their success in stochastic non-convex optimization remains elusive. In this paper, we aim to close this gap by analyzing the convergence rates of AdaGrad measured by the $ell_1$-norm of the gradient. Specifically, when the objective has $L$-Lipschitz gradient and the stochastic gradient variance is bounded by $sigma^2$, we prove a worst-case convergence rate of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{sqrt{d}L}{sqrt{T}} + frac{sqrt{d} sigma}{T^{1/4}})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem.We also present a lower bound of ${Omega}(frac{sqrt{d}}{sqrt{T}})$ for minimizing the gradient $ell_1$-norm in the deterministic setting, showing the tightness of our upper bound in the noiseless case. Moreover, under more fine-grained assumptions on the smoothness structure of the objective and the gradient noise and under favorable gradient $ell_1/ell_2$ geometry, we show that AdaGrad can potentially shave a factor of $sqrt{d}$ compared to SGD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for adaptive gradient methods that demonstrates a provable gain over SGD in the non-convex setting.
6/10/2024
🛠️
Convergence Guarantees for RMSProp and Adam in Generalized-smooth Non-convex Optimization with Affine Noise Variance
Qi Zhang, Yi Zhou, Shaofeng Zou
0
0
This paper provides the first tight convergence analyses for RMSProp and Adam in non-convex optimization under the most relaxed assumptions of coordinate-wise generalized smoothness and affine noise variance. We first analyze RMSProp, which is a special case of Adam with adaptive learning rates but without first-order momentum. Specifically, to solve the challenges due to dependence among adaptive update, unbounded gradient estimate and Lipschitz constant, we demonstrate that the first-order term in the descent lemma converges and its denominator is upper bounded by a function of gradient norm. Based on this result, we show that RMSProp with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. We then generalize our analysis to Adam, where the additional challenge is due to a mismatch between the gradient and first-order momentum. We develop a new upper bound on the first-order term in the descent lemma, which is also a function of the gradient norm. We show that Adam with proper hyperparameters converges to an $epsilon$-stationary point with an iteration complexity of $mathcal O(epsilon^{-4})$. Our complexity results for both RMSProp and Adam match with the complexity lower bound established in cite{arjevani2023lower}.
4/5/2024
⚙️
A Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Convergence of Adam with an Exact Constant Step Size in Non-Convex Settings
Alokendu Mazumder, Rishabh Sabharwal, Manan Tayal, Bhartendu Kumar, Punit Rathore
0
0
In neural network training, RMSProp and Adam remain widely favoured optimisation algorithms. One of the keys to their performance lies in selecting the correct step size, which can significantly influence their effectiveness. Additionally, questions about their theoretical convergence properties continue to be a subject of interest. In this paper, we theoretically analyse a constant step size version of Adam in the non-convex setting and discuss why it is important for the convergence of Adam to use a fixed step size. This work demonstrates the derivation and effective implementation of a constant step size for Adam, offering insights into its performance and efficiency in non convex optimisation scenarios. (i) First, we provide proof that these adaptive gradient algorithms are guaranteed to reach criticality for smooth non-convex objectives with constant step size, and we give bounds on the running time. Both deterministic and stochastic versions of Adam are analysed in this paper. We show sufficient conditions for the derived constant step size to achieve asymptotic convergence of the gradients to zero with minimal assumptions. Next, (ii) we design experiments to empirically study Adam's convergence with our proposed constant step size against stateof the art step size schedulers on classification tasks. Lastly, (iii) we also demonstrate that our derived constant step size has better abilities in reducing the gradient norms, and empirically, we show that despite the accumulation of a few past gradients, the key driver for convergence in Adam is the non-increasing step sizes.
4/5/2024
🛠️
SGD-type Methods with Guaranteed Global Stability in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization
Nachuan Xiao, Xiaoyin Hu, Kim-Chuan Toh
0
0
In this paper, we focus on providing convergence guarantees for variants of the stochastic subgradient descent (SGD) method in minimizing nonsmooth nonconvex functions. We first develop a general framework to establish global stability for general stochastic subgradient methods, where the corresponding differential inclusion admits a coercive Lyapunov function. We prove that, with sufficiently small stepsizes and controlled noises, the iterates asymptotically stabilize around the stable set of its corresponding differential inclusion. Then we introduce a scheme for developing SGD-type methods with regularized update directions for the primal variables. Based on our developed framework, we prove the global stability of our proposed scheme under mild conditions. We further illustrate that our scheme yields variants of SGD-type methods, which enjoy guaranteed convergence in training nonsmooth neural networks. In particular, by employing the sign map to regularize the update directions, we propose a novel subgradient method named the Sign-map Regularized SGD method (SRSGD). Preliminary numerical experiments exhibit the high efficiency of SRSGD in training deep neural networks.
5/15/2024