Adversarial Attacks on Multimodal Agents
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the vulnerability of multimodal AI agents, which are systems that can process and integrate information from multiple modalities like text, images, and audio.
- The researchers investigate how adversarial attacks - malicious inputs designed to fool AI models - can be used to manipulate the behavior of these multimodal agents.
- The paper presents several novel attack techniques and demonstrates their effectiveness against state-of-the-art multimodal models like CLIP and VisualGPT.
- The findings highlight the need for improved defenses to secure multimodal AI systems against adversarial attacks.
Plain English Explanation
Multimodal AI systems are a type of artificial intelligence that can process and understand information from different sources, like text, images, and audio. These systems are becoming increasingly important as they enable computers to interact with the world in more natural and human-like ways.
However, the paper shows that these multimodal AI agents can be vulnerable to "adversarial attacks." Adversarial attacks involve creating malicious inputs, like images or text, that are designed to confuse and manipulate the AI system. When the AI system encounters these adversarial inputs, it can make mistakes or behave in unexpected ways.
The researchers demonstrate several new techniques for launching these adversarial attacks against state-of-the-art multimodal AI models, like CLIP and VisualGPT. For example, they show how an attacker could create an image that convinces the AI to misidentify the contents of the image or generate text that is completely different from what the user intended.
These findings highlight the importance of developing robust defenses to protect multimodal AI systems from adversarial attacks. As these systems become more common in applications like smart assistants, self-driving cars, and content moderation, it will be crucial to ensure that they are secure and reliable.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing an overview of the growing importance of multimodal AI agents, which are capable of processing and integrating information from multiple modalities such as text, images, and audio. The researchers then review the existing literature on adversarial attacks, which are carefully crafted inputs designed to fool AI models into making mistakes or behaving in unintended ways.
Building on this foundation, the authors present several novel techniques for launching adversarial attacks against multimodal AI agents. One key approach is to generate "multimodal adversarial examples" - inputs that combine text and images in a way that exploits the vulnerabilities of the target model. For example, the researchers demonstrate how an attacker could create an image that, when paired with a specific caption, causes a CLIP-based system to misidentify the contents of the image.
The paper also introduces "cross-modal attacks," where an adversary can manipulate one modality (e.g., text) to induce incorrect behavior in another modality (e.g., image generation) within a multimodal model like VisualGPT. These attacks highlight the complex interactions between different input modalities and the potential for cascading failures in multimodal systems.
Through extensive experiments, the researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of these adversarial attack techniques against state-of-the-art multimodal models. They show that even small perturbations to the input can lead to significant changes in the model's outputs, undermining the reliability and security of these AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing field of adversarial machine learning by focusing on the vulnerabilities of multimodal AI agents. The researchers have developed novel attack techniques that exploit the complex interactions between different input modalities, which is an important area of investigation as these systems become more prevalent.
That said, the paper does acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research. For example, the authors note that their attacks were primarily evaluated in a white-box setting, where the attacker has full knowledge of the target model. Developing effective black-box attacks, where the attacker has limited information about the model, remains an open challenge.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential defenses or mitigation strategies against the presented attacks. While the findings highlight the need for more robust multimodal AI systems, the work would be strengthened by also providing insights into how these systems could be made more secure.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the security vulnerabilities of multimodal AI agents. By raising awareness of these issues, the research can help drive the development of more reliable and trustworthy AI systems that can withstand adversarial attacks.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the vulnerability of multimodal AI agents to adversarial attacks. The researchers have developed novel attack techniques that exploit the complex interactions between different input modalities, demonstrating the fragility of state-of-the-art multimodal models like CLIP and VisualGPT.
The findings highlight the critical need for improved defenses to secure multimodal AI systems, as these technologies become increasingly prevalent in applications that require reliable and trustworthy performance. By raising awareness of these security vulnerabilities, this research can help drive the development of more robust and resilient multimodal AI agents that can withstand adversarial attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Adversarial Attacks on Multimodal Agents
Chen Henry Wu, Jing Yu Koh, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Daniel Fried, Aditi Raghunathan
Vision-enabled language models (VLMs) are now used to build autonomous multimodal agents capable of taking actions in real environments. In this paper, we show that multimodal agents raise new safety risks, even though attacking agents is more challenging than prior attacks due to limited access to and knowledge about the environment. Our attacks use adversarial text strings to guide gradient-based perturbation over one trigger image in the environment: (1) our captioner attack attacks white-box captioners if they are used to process images into captions as additional inputs to the VLM; (2) our CLIP attack attacks a set of CLIP models jointly, which can transfer to proprietary VLMs. To evaluate the attacks, we curated VisualWebArena-Adv, a set of adversarial tasks based on VisualWebArena, an environment for web-based multimodal agent tasks. Within an L-infinity norm of $16/256$ on a single image, the captioner attack can make a captioner-augmented GPT-4V agent execute the adversarial goals with a 75% success rate. When we remove the captioner or use GPT-4V to generate its own captions, the CLIP attack can achieve success rates of 21% and 43%, respectively. Experiments on agents based on other VLMs, such as Gemini-1.5, Claude-3, and GPT-4o, show interesting differences in their robustness. Further analysis reveals several key factors contributing to the attack's success, and we also discuss the implications for defenses as well. Project page: https://chenwu.io/attack-agent Code and data: https://github.com/ChenWu98/agent-attack
Read more6/19/2024
0
Revisiting the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models: a Multimodal Perspective
Wanqi Zhou, Shuanghao Bai, Qibin Zhao, Badong Chen
Pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP have shown impressive generalization performance across various downstream tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. While prior research has primarily concentrated on improving the adversarial robustness of image encoders to guard against attacks on images, the exploration of text-based and multimodal attacks has largely been overlooked. In this work, we initiate the first known and comprehensive effort to study adapting vision-language models for adversarial robustness under the multimodal attack. Firstly, we introduce a multimodal attack strategy and investigate the impact of different attacks. We then propose a multimodal contrastive adversarial training loss, aligning the clean and adversarial text embeddings with the adversarial and clean visual features, to enhance the adversarial robustness of both image and text encoders of CLIP. Extensive experiments on 15 datasets across two tasks demonstrate that our method significantly improves the adversarial robustness of CLIP. Interestingly, we find that the model fine-tuned against multimodal adversarial attacks exhibits greater robustness than its counterpart fine-tuned solely against image-based attacks, even in the context of image attacks, which may open up new possibilities for enhancing the security of VLMs.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models through Collaborative Multimodal Interaction
Jiyuan Fu, Zhaoyu Chen, Kaixun Jiang, Haijing Guo, Jiafeng Wang, Shuyong Gao, Wenqiang Zhang
Despite the substantial advancements in Vision-Language Pre-training (VLP) models, their susceptibility to adversarial attacks poses a significant challenge. Existing work rarely studies the transferability of attacks on VLP models, resulting in a substantial performance gap from white-box attacks. We observe that prior work overlooks the interaction mechanisms between modalities, which plays a crucial role in understanding the intricacies of VLP models. In response, we propose a novel attack, called Collaborative Multimodal Interaction Attack (CMI-Attack), leveraging modality interaction through embedding guidance and interaction enhancement. Specifically, attacking text at the embedding level while preserving semantics, as well as utilizing interaction image gradients to enhance constraints on perturbations of texts and images. Significantly, in the image-text retrieval task on Flickr30K dataset, CMI-Attack raises the transfer success rates from ALBEF to TCL, $text{CLIP}_{text{ViT}}$ and $text{CLIP}_{text{CNN}}$ by 8.11%-16.75% over state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, CMI-Attack also demonstrates superior performance in cross-task generalization scenarios. Our work addresses the underexplored realm of transfer attacks on VLP models, shedding light on the importance of modality interaction for enhanced adversarial robustness.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Probing the Robustness of Vision-Language Pretrained Models: A Multimodal Adversarial Attack Approach
Jiwei Guan, Tianyu Ding, Longbing Cao, Lei Pan, Chen Wang, Xi Zheng
Vision-language pretraining (VLP) with transformers has demonstrated exceptional performance across numerous multimodal tasks. However, the adversarial robustness of these models has not been thoroughly investigated. Existing multimodal attack methods have largely overlooked cross-modal interactions between visual and textual modalities, particularly in the context of cross-attention mechanisms. In this paper, we study the adversarial vulnerability of recent VLP transformers and design a novel Joint Multimodal Transformer Feature Attack (JMTFA) that concurrently introduces adversarial perturbations in both visual and textual modalities under white-box settings. JMTFA strategically targets attention relevance scores to disrupt important features within each modality, generating adversarial samples by fusing perturbations and leading to erroneous model predictions. Experimental results indicate that the proposed approach achieves high attack success rates on vision-language understanding and reasoning downstream tasks compared to existing baselines. Notably, our findings reveal that the textual modality significantly influences the complex fusion processes within VLP transformers. Moreover, we observe no apparent relationship between model size and adversarial robustness under our proposed attacks. These insights emphasize a new dimension of adversarial robustness and underscore potential risks in the reliable deployment of multimodal AI systems.
Read more8/27/2024