Adversarial Machine Learning Threats to Spacecraft
2405.08834
0
0
❗
Abstract
Spacecraft are among the earliest autonomous systems. Their ability to function without a human in the loop have afforded some of humanity's grandest achievements. As reliance on autonomy grows, space vehicles will become increasingly vulnerable to attacks designed to disrupt autonomous processes-especially probabilistic ones based on machine learning. This paper aims to elucidate and demonstrate the threats that adversarial machine learning (AML) capabilities pose to spacecraft. First, an AML threat taxonomy for spacecraft is introduced. Next, we demonstrate the execution of AML attacks against spacecraft through experimental simulations using NASA's Core Flight System (cFS) and NASA's On-board Artificial Intelligence Research (OnAIR) Platform. Our findings highlight the imperative for incorporating AML-focused security measures in spacecraft that engage autonomy.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Spacecraft are among the earliest autonomous systems, enabling some of humanity's greatest achievements.
- As reliance on autonomy grows, space vehicles are becoming increasingly vulnerable to attacks that disrupt autonomous processes, especially those based on machine learning.
- This paper aims to explore the threats that adversarial machine learning (AML) capabilities pose to spacecraft.
Plain English Explanation
Spacecraft have been operating autonomously for a long time, allowing us to accomplish remarkable feats in space exploration. However, as we continue to rely more on autonomous systems, these spacecraft are becoming vulnerable to attacks designed to disrupt their autonomous processes, particularly those that use machine learning algorithms.
This research paper aims to identify and demonstrate the threats that adversarial machine learning (AML) techniques pose to spacecraft. AML refers to methods that can trick machine learning models into making incorrect predictions or decisions, even when the input data appears normal.
The researchers first introduce a taxonomy of AML threats that are specific to spacecraft. Then, they conduct experiments using NASA's software platforms to demonstrate how these AML attacks can be executed against spacecraft systems. The goal is to highlight the urgent need for incorporating security measures that specifically address AML threats in spacecraft that rely on autonomous systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by establishing the importance of spacecraft as early autonomous systems that have enabled many of humanity's greatest achievements in space exploration. However, as autonomy becomes more prevalent, these space vehicles are becoming increasingly vulnerable to attacks designed to disrupt their autonomous processes, particularly those based on machine learning algorithms.
To address this concern, the researchers first introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of AML threats that are specific to spacecraft. This taxonomy categorizes the different types of AML attacks that could be targeted at spacecraft, such as data poisoning, model extraction, and evasion attacks.
Next, the researchers demonstrate the execution of these AML attacks against spacecraft through experimental simulations using NASA's Core Flight System (cFS) and NASA's On-board Artificial Intelligence Research (OnAIR) Platform. These experiments involve introducing adversarial inputs or manipulating the training data to try and fool the machine learning models used in spacecraft systems.
The findings from these experiments highlight the significant vulnerabilities that spacecraft face when it comes to AML threats. The researchers emphasize the urgent need for incorporating robust AML-focused security measures into the design and deployment of autonomous spacecraft systems to mitigate these emerging threats.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and timely examination of the threats that adversarial machine learning poses to spacecraft, an area that has received limited attention in the research literature.
One potential limitation of the study is the scope of the experiments, which are limited to simulations using NASA's specific software platforms. While these provide a valuable proof-of-concept, there may be additional challenges or nuances to consider when applying these findings to real-world spacecraft systems with different architectures and software stacks.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential countermeasures or defense strategies that could be employed to safeguard spacecraft against AML attacks. Further research in this direction would be valuable to provide a more complete understanding of the problem and potential solutions.
Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the urgent need to address AML threats in the design and deployment of autonomous spacecraft systems. By raising awareness of these risks and demonstrating their feasibility, the researchers have laid the groundwork for future work to enhance the security and resilience of these critical space assets.
Conclusion
This research paper highlights the growing threat of adversarial machine learning (AML) to autonomous spacecraft, which have been at the forefront of some of humanity's greatest achievements in space exploration.
As spacecraft become increasingly reliant on autonomous systems, including those powered by machine learning, they are becoming more vulnerable to attacks designed to disrupt these critical processes. The researchers have introduced a comprehensive taxonomy of AML threats specific to spacecraft and demonstrated the feasibility of executing these attacks through experimental simulations.
The findings underscore the imperative for incorporating robust AML-focused security measures into the design and deployment of autonomous spacecraft systems. By addressing these emerging threats, the space industry can help ensure the continued reliability and resilience of these vital assets, enabling us to push the boundaries of space exploration even further.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
Machine Learning in Space: Surveying the Robustness of on-board ML models to Radiation
Kevin Lange, Federico Fontana, Francesco Rossi, Mattia Varile, Giovanni Apruzzese
0
0
Modern spacecraft are increasingly relying on machine learning (ML). However, physical equipment in space is subject to various natural hazards, such as radiation, which may inhibit the correct operation of computing devices. Despite plenty of evidence showing the damage that naturally-induced faults can cause to ML-related hardware, we observe that the effects of radiation on ML models for space applications are not well-studied. This is a problem: without understanding how ML models are affected by these natural phenomena, it is uncertain where to start from to develop radiation-tolerant ML software. As ML researchers, we attempt to tackle this dilemma. By partnering up with space-industry practitioners specialized in ML, we perform a reflective analysis of the state of the art. We provide factual evidence that prior work did not thoroughly examine the impact of natural hazards on ML models meant for spacecraft. Then, through a negative result, we show that some existing open-source technologies can hardly be used by researchers to study the effects of radiation for some applications of ML in satellites. As a constructive step forward, we perform simple experiments showcasing how to leverage current frameworks to assess the robustness of practical ML models for cloud detection against radiation-induced faults. Our evaluation reveals that not all faults are as devastating as claimed by some prior work. By publicly releasing our resources, we provide a foothold -- usable by researchers without access to spacecraft -- for spearheading development of space-tolerant ML models.
5/31/2024
Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Automated Control Systems: A Comprehensive Benchmark
Vitaliy Pozdnyakov, Aleksandr Kovalenko, Ilya Makarov, Mikhail Drobyshevskiy, Kirill Lukyanov
0
0
Integrating machine learning into Automated Control Systems (ACS) enhances decision-making in industrial process management. One of the limitations to the widespread adoption of these technologies in industry is the vulnerability of neural networks to adversarial attacks. This study explores the threats in deploying deep learning models for fault diagnosis in ACS using the Tennessee Eastman Process dataset. By evaluating three neural networks with different architectures, we subject them to six types of adversarial attacks and explore five different defense methods. Our results highlight the strong vulnerability of models to adversarial samples and the varying effectiveness of defense strategies. We also propose a novel protection approach by combining multiple defense methods and demonstrate it's efficacy. This research contributes several insights into securing machine learning within ACS, ensuring robust fault diagnosis in industrial processes.
6/10/2024
💬
LLMSat: A Large Language Model-Based Goal-Oriented Agent for Autonomous Space Exploration
David Maranto
0
0
As spacecraft journey further from Earth with more complex missions, systems of greater autonomy and onboard intelligence are called for. Reducing reliance on human-based mission control becomes increasingly critical if we are to increase our rate of solar-system-wide exploration. Recent work has explored AI-based goal-oriented systems to increase the level of autonomy in mission execution. These systems make use of symbolic reasoning managers to make inferences from the state of a spacecraft and a handcrafted knowledge base, enabling autonomous generation of tasks and re-planning. Such systems have proven to be successful in controlled cases, but they are difficult to implement as they require human-crafted ontological models to allow the spacecraft to understand the world. Reinforcement learning has been applied to train robotic agents to pursue a goal. A new architecture for autonomy is called for. This work explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) as the high-level control system of a spacecraft. Using a systems engineering approach, this work presents the design and development of an agentic spacecraft controller by leveraging an LLM as a reasoning engine, to evaluate the utility of such an architecture in achieving higher levels of spacecraft autonomy. A series of deep space mission scenarios simulated within the popular game engine Kerbal Space Program (KSP) are used as case studies to evaluate the implementation against the requirements. It is shown the reasoning and planning abilities of present-day LLMs do not scale well as the complexity of a mission increases, but this can be alleviated with adequate prompting frameworks and strategic selection of the agent's level of authority over the host spacecraft. This research evaluates the potential of LLMs in augmenting autonomous decision-making systems for future robotic space applications.
5/3/2024
🔎
New!Intriguing Properties of Adversarial ML Attacks in the Problem Space [Extended Version]
Jacopo Cortellazzi, Feargus Pendlebury, Daniel Arp, Erwin Quiring, Fabio Pierazzi, Lorenzo Cavallaro
0
0
Recent research efforts on adversarial machine learning (ML) have investigated problem-space attacks, focusing on the generation of real evasive objects in domains where, unlike images, there is no clear inverse mapping to the feature space (e.g., software). However, the design, comparison, and real-world implications of problem-space attacks remain underexplored. This article makes three major contributions. Firstly, we propose a general formalization for adversarial ML evasion attacks in the problem-space, which includes the definition of a comprehensive set of constraints on available transformations, preserved semantics, absent artifacts, and plausibility. We shed light on the relationship between feature space and problem space, and we introduce the concept of side-effect features as the by-product of the inverse feature-mapping problem. This enables us to define and prove necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of problem-space attacks. Secondly, building on our general formalization, we propose a novel problem-space attack on Android malware that overcomes past limitations in terms of semantics and artifacts. We have tested our approach on a dataset with 150K Android apps from 2016 and 2018 which show the practical feasibility of evading a state-of-the-art malware classifier along with its hardened version. Thirdly, we explore the effectiveness of adversarial training as a possible approach to enforce robustness against adversarial samples, evaluating its effectiveness on the considered machine learning models under different scenarios. Our results demonstrate that adversarial-malware as a service is a realistic threat, as we automatically generate thousands of realistic and inconspicuous adversarial applications at scale, where on average it takes only a few minutes to generate an adversarial instance.
6/28/2024