Machine Learning in Space: Surveying the Robustness of on-board ML models to Radiation

Read original: arXiv:2405.02642 - Published 5/31/2024 by Kevin Lange, Federico Fontana, Francesco Rossi, Mattia Varile, Giovanni Apruzzese
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Spacecraft are increasingly relying on machine learning (ML) for various applications.
  • However, the physical equipment in space is subject to natural hazards like radiation, which can affect the operation of computing devices.
  • While there is evidence of the damage caused by naturally-induced faults to ML-related hardware, the effects of radiation on ML models for space applications are not well-studied.
  • Researchers attempt to address this knowledge gap by partnering with space-industry practitioners specialized in ML.

Plain English Explanation

Spacecraft, the vehicles that travel through space, are starting to use machine learning more and more. Machine learning is a type of artificial intelligence that allows computers to learn and improve from experience without being explicitly programmed.

However, the electronic components and hardware inside spacecraft can be affected by the harsh environment of space. Radiation from the sun and other sources can interfere with the normal functioning of the computer systems that run the machine learning algorithms.

Even though there is plenty of evidence showing that these natural hazards can cause problems for the hardware that runs machine learning, researchers have not thoroughly studied how the machine learning models themselves are impacted by things like radiation. This is a problem, because without understanding these effects, it's difficult to develop machine learning software that can work reliably in the space environment.

To tackle this issue, the researchers in this study partnered with experts from the space industry who specialize in using machine learning. Together, they looked at the current state of research in this area and found that previous work had not fully explored the impact of natural hazards on machine learning models designed for spacecraft.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first provide evidence that prior work did not thoroughly examine the impact of natural hazards like radiation on machine learning models intended for use in spacecraft. They then conduct simple experiments to show how existing open-source frameworks can be used to assess the robustness of practical machine learning models, such as those used for cloud detection, against radiation-induced faults.

The evaluation reveals that not all faults caused by radiation are as devastating as claimed by some previous research. By publicly releasing their resources, the researchers aim to provide a starting point for other researchers who may not have direct access to spacecraft, enabling them to study the development of space-tolerant machine learning models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their work is a "negative result," meaning they were unable to find the expected effects of radiation on machine learning models. This could be seen as a limitation, as it does not provide a clear path forward for developing robust machine learning systems for space applications.

Additionally, the experiments performed were relatively simple, and the researchers note that more comprehensive testing would be needed to fully understand the impact of radiation on complex machine learning models. There may also be other natural hazards, beyond radiation, that could affect the performance of machine learning in space that were not addressed in this study.

Despite these caveats, the researchers' approach of partnering with industry experts and publicly sharing their resources is commendable, as it lays the groundwork for future research in this important area. By challenging the assumptions of prior work and providing a starting point for further investigation, the researchers have made a valuable contribution to the field of machine learning robustness for space applications.

Conclusion

This study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of how machine learning models are affected by the harsh environment of space, particularly the impact of natural hazards like radiation. While the researchers were unable to find the expected negative effects, they provide a foundation for future work by sharing their resources and encouraging other researchers to explore this critical area.

As spacecraft continue to rely more on machine learning for a variety of applications, from orbit estimation to dust and aerosol detection, ensuring the reliability and resilience of these models in the face of natural challenges will be crucial. The researchers' work represents an important step towards developing machine learning models that can thrive in the demanding conditions of space.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Machine Learning in Space: Surveying the Robustness of on-board ML models to Radiation

Kevin Lange, Federico Fontana, Francesco Rossi, Mattia Varile, Giovanni Apruzzese

Modern spacecraft are increasingly relying on machine learning (ML). However, physical equipment in space is subject to various natural hazards, such as radiation, which may inhibit the correct operation of computing devices. Despite plenty of evidence showing the damage that naturally-induced faults can cause to ML-related hardware, we observe that the effects of radiation on ML models for space applications are not well-studied. This is a problem: without understanding how ML models are affected by these natural phenomena, it is uncertain where to start from to develop radiation-tolerant ML software. As ML researchers, we attempt to tackle this dilemma. By partnering up with space-industry practitioners specialized in ML, we perform a reflective analysis of the state of the art. We provide factual evidence that prior work did not thoroughly examine the impact of natural hazards on ML models meant for spacecraft. Then, through a negative result, we show that some existing open-source technologies can hardly be used by researchers to study the effects of radiation for some applications of ML in satellites. As a constructive step forward, we perform simple experiments showcasing how to leverage current frameworks to assess the robustness of practical ML models for cloud detection against radiation-induced faults. Our evaluation reveals that not all faults are as devastating as claimed by some prior work. By publicly releasing our resources, we provide a foothold -- usable by researchers without access to spacecraft -- for spearheading development of space-tolerant ML models.

Read more

5/31/2024

Total Score

0

Adversarial Machine Learning Threats to Spacecraft

Rajiv Thummala, Shristi Sharma, Matteo Calabrese, Gregory Falco

Spacecraft are among the earliest autonomous systems. Their ability to function without a human in the loop have afforded some of humanity's grandest achievements. As reliance on autonomy grows, space vehicles will become increasingly vulnerable to attacks designed to disrupt autonomous processes-especially probabilistic ones based on machine learning. This paper aims to elucidate and demonstrate the threats that adversarial machine learning (AML) capabilities pose to spacecraft. First, an AML threat taxonomy for spacecraft is introduced. Next, we demonstrate the execution of AML attacks against spacecraft through experimental simulations using NASA's Core Flight System (cFS) and NASA's On-board Artificial Intelligence Research (OnAIR) Platform. Our findings highlight the imperative for incorporating AML-focused security measures in spacecraft that engage autonomy.

Read more

5/16/2024

A Case for Application-Aware Space Radiation Tolerance in Orbital Computing
Total Score

0

A Case for Application-Aware Space Radiation Tolerance in Orbital Computing

Meiqi Wang, Han Qiu, Longnv Xu, Di Wang, Yuanjie Li, Tianwei Zhang, Jun Liu, Hewu Li

We are witnessing a surge in the use of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware for cost-effective in-orbit computing, such as deep neural network (DNN) based on-satellite sensor data processing, Earth object detection, and task decision.However, once exposed to harsh space environments, COTS hardware is vulnerable to cosmic radiation and suffers from exhaustive single-event upsets (SEUs) and multi-unit upsets (MCUs), both threatening the functionality and correctness of in-orbit computing.Existing hardware and system software protections against radiation are expensive for resource-constrained COTS nanosatellites and overwhelming for upper-layer applications due to their requirement for heavy resource redundancy and frequent reboots. Instead, we make a case for cost-effective space radiation tolerance using application domain knowledge. Our solution for the on-satellite DNN tasks, name, exploits the uneven SEU/MCU sensitivity across DNN layers and MCUs' spatial correlation for lightweight radiation-tolerant in-orbit AI computing. Our extensive experiments using Chaohu-1 SAR satellite payloads and a hardware-in-the-loop, real data-driven space radiation emulator validate that RedNet can suppress the influence of radiation errors to $approx$ 0 and accelerate the on-satellite DNN inference speed by 8.4%-33.0% at negligible extra costs.

Read more

7/17/2024

Physics-Informed Machine Learning Towards A Real-Time Spacecraft Thermal Simulator
Total Score

0

Physics-Informed Machine Learning Towards A Real-Time Spacecraft Thermal Simulator

Manaswin Oddiraju, Zaki Hasnain, Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay, Eric Sunada, Souma Chowdhury

Modeling thermal states for complex space missions, such as the surface exploration of airless bodies, requires high computation, whether used in ground-based analysis for spacecraft design or during onboard reasoning for autonomous operations. For example, a finite-element thermal model with hundreds of elements can take significant time to simulate, which makes it unsuitable for onboard reasoning during time-sensitive scenarios such as descent and landing, proximity operations, or in-space assembly. Further, the lack of fast and accurate thermal modeling drives thermal designs to be more conservative and leads to spacecraft with larger mass and higher power budgets. The emerging paradigm of physics-informed machine learning (PIML) presents a class of hybrid modeling architectures that address this challenge by combining simplified physics models with machine learning (ML) models resulting in models which maintain both interpretability and robustness. Such techniques enable designs with reduced mass and power through onboard thermal-state estimation and control and may lead to improved onboard handling of off-nominal states, including unplanned down-time. The PIML model or hybrid model presented here consists of a neural network which predicts reduced nodalizations (distribution and size of coarse mesh) given on-orbit thermal load conditions, and subsequently a (relatively coarse) finite-difference model operates on this mesh to predict thermal states. We compare the computational performance and accuracy of the hybrid model to a data-driven neural net model, and a high-fidelity finite-difference model of a prototype Earth-orbiting small spacecraft. The PIML based active nodalization approach provides significantly better generalization than the neural net model and coarse mesh model, while reducing computing cost by up to 1.7x compared to the high-fidelity model.

Read more

9/6/2024