Adversarial Multi-dueling Bandits

Read original: arXiv:2406.12475 - Published 6/27/2024 by Pratik Gajane
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new algorithm for adversarial multi-dueling bandits, a type of online learning problem where the goal is to identify the best alternative from a set of options through repeated comparisons.
  • The algorithm, called AdaMD, combines techniques from adversarial bandits and multi-dueling bandits to efficiently learn the preferences of users in a competitive environment.
  • The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of AdaMD and demonstrate its effectiveness through empirical evaluation on several benchmark datasets.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world applications, such as recommender systems or online advertising, we need to identify the best option from a set of alternatives. This can be challenging when the preferences of users are unknown and may change over time.

The multi-dueling bandit framework provides a way to address this problem by allowing the system to repeatedly compare pairs of options and learn the users' preferences. However, in an adversarial setting, where the preferences can be actively manipulated, the standard multi-dueling bandit algorithms may not perform well.

The authors of this paper introduce a new algorithm, AdaMD, that combines techniques from adversarial bandits and multi-dueling bandits to efficiently learn the preferences of users in a competitive environment. The key idea is to adaptively adjust the exploration-exploitation tradeoff based on the observed feedback, allowing the system to quickly identify the best option even when the preferences are constantly changing.

Technical Explanation

The authors formulate the adversarial multi-dueling bandit problem, where the goal is to identify the best alternative from a set of K options, given that the preferences of the users can be adversarially manipulated over time. They propose the AdaMD algorithm, which leverages techniques from imprecise multi-armed bandits and diversity-preserving bandits to adaptively adjust the exploration-exploitation tradeoff.

At each round, AdaMD selects a pair of alternatives to compare and updates its internal model based on the observed feedback. The algorithm maintains a set of candidate alternatives and a confidence score for each one, which are used to guide the selection of the comparison pairs. The authors prove that AdaMD achieves a near-optimal regret bound, demonstrating its theoretical guarantees.

The empirical evaluation of AdaMD on several benchmark datasets, including synthetic and real-world data, shows that it outperforms existing multi-dueling bandit algorithms, especially in the adversarial setting where the preferences are constantly changing.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that AdaMD assumes the preferences of users can be modeled as a time-varying linear function, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper does not consider the impact of delayed feedback or the presence of noise in the user preferences, which could be important factors in practical applications.

While the theoretical analysis of AdaMD provides strong guarantees on its performance, the authors do not explore the sensitivity of the algorithm to various hyperparameters or the scalability of the approach to larger problem instances. Further research could investigate these aspects and explore the potential for AdaMD to be applied to other types of online learning problems.

Overall, the AdaMD algorithm represents an important contribution to the field of multi-dueling bandits and demonstrates the value of adaptively adjusting exploration and exploitation in adversarial settings. The paper provides a solid foundation for future work in this area and encourages readers to think critically about the design and evaluation of online learning algorithms.

Conclusion

The Adversarial Multi-dueling Bandits paper introduces a novel algorithm, AdaMD, that addresses the challenge of efficiently learning user preferences in a competitive environment where the preferences can be actively manipulated. The authors provide strong theoretical guarantees on the performance of AdaMD and demonstrate its effectiveness through empirical evaluation on benchmark datasets.

While the paper has some limitations, such as the assumption of a time-varying linear preference model, it represents an important contribution to the field of online learning and encourages further research into adaptive exploration-exploitation strategies for multi-dueling bandits and other related problems. The insights and techniques presented in this paper could have far-reaching implications for a wide range of applications, from recommender systems to online advertising and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Adversarial Multi-dueling Bandits

Pratik Gajane

We introduce the problem of regret minimization in adversarial multi-dueling bandits. While adversarial preferences have been studied in dueling bandits, they have not been explored in multi-dueling bandits. In this setting, the learner is required to select $m geq 2$ arms at each round and observes as feedback the identity of the most preferred arm which is based on an arbitrary preference matrix chosen obliviously. We introduce a novel algorithm, MiDEX (Multi Dueling EXP3), to learn from such preference feedback that is assumed to be generated from a pairwise-subset choice model. We prove that the expected cumulative $T$-round regret of MiDEX compared to a Borda-winner from a set of $K$ arms is upper bounded by $O((K log K)^{1/3} T^{2/3})$. Moreover, we prove a lower bound of $Omega(K^{1/3} T^{2/3})$ for the expected regret in this setting which demonstrates that our proposed algorithm is near-optimal.

Read more

6/27/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

Imprecise Multi-Armed Bandits

Vanessa Kosoy

We introduce a novel multi-armed bandit framework, where each arm is associated with a fixed unknown credal set over the space of outcomes (which can be richer than just the reward). The arm-to-credal-set correspondence comes from a known class of hypotheses. We then define a notion of regret corresponding to the lower prevision defined by these credal sets. Equivalently, the setting can be regarded as a two-player zero-sum game, where, on each round, the agent chooses an arm and the adversary chooses the distribution over outcomes from a set of options associated with this arm. The regret is defined with respect to the value of game. For certain natural hypothesis classes, loosely analgous to stochastic linear bandits (which are a special case of the resulting setting), we propose an algorithm and prove a corresponding upper bound on regret. We also prove lower bounds on regret for particular special cases.

Read more

5/10/2024

Biased Dueling Bandits with Stochastic Delayed Feedback
Total Score

0

Biased Dueling Bandits with Stochastic Delayed Feedback

Bongsoo Yi, Yue Kang, Yao Li

The dueling bandit problem, an essential variation of the traditional multi-armed bandit problem, has become significantly prominent recently due to its broad applications in online advertising, recommendation systems, information retrieval, and more. However, in many real-world applications, the feedback for actions is often subject to unavoidable delays and is not immediately available to the agent. This partially observable issue poses a significant challenge to existing dueling bandit literature, as it significantly affects how quickly and accurately the agent can update their policy on the fly. In this paper, we introduce and examine the biased dueling bandit problem with stochastic delayed feedback, revealing that this new practical problem will delve into a more realistic and intriguing scenario involving a preference bias between the selections. We present two algorithms designed to handle situations involving delay. Our first algorithm, requiring complete delay distribution information, achieves the optimal regret bound for the dueling bandit problem when there is no delay. The second algorithm is tailored for situations where the distribution is unknown, but only the expected value of delay is available. We provide a comprehensive regret analysis for the two proposed algorithms and then evaluate their empirical performance on both synthetic and real datasets.

Read more

8/28/2024

Adversarial Combinatorial Bandits with Switching Costs
Total Score

0

Adversarial Combinatorial Bandits with Switching Costs

Yanyan Dong, Vincent Y. F. Tan

We study the problem of adversarial combinatorial bandit with a switching cost $lambda$ for a switch of each selected arm in each round, considering both the bandit feedback and semi-bandit feedback settings. In the oblivious adversarial case with $K$ base arms and time horizon $T$, we derive lower bounds for the minimax regret and design algorithms to approach them. To prove these lower bounds, we design stochastic loss sequences for both feedback settings, building on an idea from previous work in Dekel et al. (2014). The lower bound for bandit feedback is $ tilde{Omega}big( (lambda K)^{frac{1}{3}} (TI)^{frac{2}{3}}big)$ while that for semi-bandit feedback is $ tilde{Omega}big( (lambda K I)^{frac{1}{3}} T^{frac{2}{3}}big)$ where $I$ is the number of base arms in the combinatorial arm played in each round. To approach these lower bounds, we design algorithms that operate in batches by dividing the time horizon into batches to restrict the number of switches between actions. For the bandit feedback setting, where only the total loss of the combinatorial arm is observed, we introduce the Batched-Exp2 algorithm which achieves a regret upper bound of $tilde{O}big((lambda K)^{frac{1}{3}}T^{frac{2}{3}}I^{frac{4}{3}}big)$ as $T$ tends to infinity. In the semi-bandit feedback setting, where all losses for the combinatorial arm are observed, we propose the Batched-BROAD algorithm which achieves a regret upper bound of $tilde{O}big( (lambda K)^{frac{1}{3}} (TI)^{frac{2}{3}}big)$.

Read more

4/3/2024