Adversarial Robust Low Rank Matrix Estimation: Compressed Sensing and Matrix Completion

Overview

• The paper considers the problem of robust low-rank matrix estimation when the output data is contaminated by adversarial attacks.
• It proposes a unified approach using the Huber loss function and nuclear norm penalization to obtain sharp estimation error bounds for various matrix estimation problems, including matrix compressed sensing and matrix completion.
• The error bounds obtained in this paper are claimed to be sharper than previous results.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the problem of estimating a low-rank matrix when the observed data is tampered with by an adversary. The adversary is allowed to add any value they want to any of the outputs, and this can depend on the entire dataset.

The researchers propose a new method that combines two techniques - the Huber loss function and nuclear norm penalization. This allows them to get very precise bounds on the estimation error for different matrix estimation problems, like matrix compressed sensing and matrix completion.

These error bounds are better than what has been shown before. The key idea is to use this combined approach of Huber loss and nuclear norm, which is different from what has been done in the past.

Technical Explanation

The paper tackles the problem of robust low-rank matrix estimation in the presence of adversarial contamination of the output data. The adversary is allowed to add arbitrary values to arbitrary outputs, and these values can depend on the entire dataset.

The authors propose a unified approach based on the Huber loss function and nuclear norm penalization to obtain sharp estimation error bounds for various matrix estimation problems, including matrix compressed sensing (with lasso as a partial problem) and matrix completion.

This is a different approach from the conventional ones used in prior work on coordinated sparse recovery with label noise and low-rank matrix completion via robust alternating minimization.

The key aspects of the technical approach are:

• Leveraging the Huber loss function to handle the adversarial contamination of outputs
• Incorporating nuclear norm penalization to encourage low-rank solutions
• Deriving sharp estimation error bounds for various matrix estimation problems

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and principled approach to the challenging problem of robust low-rank matrix estimation in the presence of adversarial attacks. The use of the Huber loss function and nuclear norm penalization is a clever combination that allows the authors to obtain sharper error bounds than previous work.

However, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the proposed method or provide any empirical evaluation of its performance on real-world datasets. It would be helpful to understand how the method scales and how it compares to alternative approaches in terms of both statistical and computational efficiency.

Additionally, the paper does not address the issue of how to choose the appropriate tuning parameters for the Huber loss function and nuclear norm penalization. This is an important practical consideration that could impact the method's performance in different settings.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable theoretical contribution, but more work is needed to assess the practical benefits and limitations of the proposed approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel and theoretically sound approach to the problem of robust low-rank matrix estimation in the presence of adversarial attacks. By combining the Huber loss function and nuclear norm penalization, the researchers were able to obtain sharper error bounds than previous methods for a variety of matrix estimation problems, including matrix compressed sensing and matrix completion.

While the theoretical insights are compelling, the lack of empirical evaluation and discussion of practical considerations limit the immediate applicability of the proposed method. Further research is needed to understand the real-world performance and limitations of this approach, as well as to explore potential extensions or alternatives that could make the method more accessible to practitioners in the field.