Adversarial Training of Two-Layer Polynomial and ReLU Activation Networks via Convex Optimization

Overview

• This paper focuses on making neural networks more robust to adversarial attacks, which are small, carefully crafted changes to input data that can cause a model to make incorrect predictions.
• The authors propose a convex optimization approach to adversarial training for two-layer neural networks with polynomial activations and ReLU activations.
• They also derive a convex formulation to compute the minimum distance from a correctly classified example to the decision boundary of a polynomial activation network.
• This work aims to improve the robustness of heavily overparameterized neural networks, which are increasingly being used in safety-critical applications.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks have become incredibly powerful at tasks like image recognition and natural language processing. However, these models can be surprisingly fragile - small, imperceptible changes to the input data can cause them to make completely different predictions. These changes, known as adversarial attacks, pose a serious challenge, especially as neural networks are being deployed in safety-critical applications like self-driving cars and medical diagnosis.

In this paper, the authors propose a new approach to "adversarial training" - training neural networks to be more robust to these adversarial attacks. Their key insight is to reformulate the training problem as a type of convex optimization that can be solved efficiently, even for large, complex neural network models.

Specifically, they develop convex formulations for training two-layer neural networks with polynomial activations and ReLU activations. These models are then more resistant to adversarial attacks compared to standard training approaches.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on benchmark datasets, showing significant improvements in both clean and robust test accuracy. This work represents an important step towards building neural networks that are more reliable and trustworthy for safety-critical applications.

Technical Explanation

The authors start by reformulating the adversarial training problem for two-layer neural networks with polynomial and ReLU activations as convex programs. For polynomial activation networks, they derive a convex semidefinite program (SDP) using the S-procedure, which allows them to efficiently optimize the network's weights to be robust to adversarial perturbations.

Similarly, they develop a convex SDP to compute the minimum distance from a correctly classified example to the decision boundary of a polynomial activation network. This provides a way to quantify and improve the network's robustness.

For two-layer ReLU networks, the authors present a scalable approach to adversarial training that is compatible with standard machine learning libraries and can leverage GPU acceleration. This is in contrast to previous work, which had difficulty scaling to larger models.

The authors evaluate their methods on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset for polynomial networks and the CIFAR-10 dataset for ReLU networks. Their adversarially trained polynomial networks show large increases in robust test accuracy against $\ell^\infty$ attacks compared to standard training. For the ReLU networks, the authors retrain the final two fully connected layers of a Pre-Activation ResNet-18 model and achieve higher clean and robust test accuracies than the same architecture trained with sharpness-aware minimization.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thorough technical explanation of their approach and demonstrate its effectiveness on benchmark datasets. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for future research:

1. The convex formulations are currently limited to two-layer networks, while many state-of-the-art models have much deeper architectures. Extending the convex optimization approach to deeper networks would be an important next step.

2. The paper focuses on $\ell^\infty$ adversarial attacks, but there are many other types of adversarial perturbations that could be considered, such as $\ell^2$ or spatial transformations. Evaluating the robustness of the proposed methods against a broader set of attacks would be valuable.

3. The authors mention that their ReLU training approach is scalable, but they only evaluate it on a relatively small dataset (CIFAR-10). Demonstrating the method's performance on larger, more complex datasets would help validate its practical applicability.

4. While the authors show improvements in robust accuracy, it's not clear how this translates to real-world safety and reliability. Further research is needed to understand the broader implications of adversarial robustness for the deployment of neural networks in safety-critical systems.

Overall, this work represents an important contribution to the field of adversarial robustness, but there are still many open challenges and areas for future exploration.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel approach to making neural networks more robust to adversarial attacks by formulating the training problem as a convex optimization problem. The authors develop scalable convex SDPs for training two-layer polynomial and ReLU activation networks to be resistant to $\ell^\infty$ perturbations.

The key insight is that by reframing the training objective as a convex program, the authors can efficiently optimize the network weights to be more robust, even for large, complex models. This work is an important step towards building reliable and trustworthy neural networks for safety-critical applications.

While the current approach is limited to shallow networks, the authors' techniques represent a promising direction for improving the adversarial robustness of deep learning models more broadly. Continued research in this area could have significant implications for the real-world deployment of neural networks in high-stakes domains.